Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4347 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've recently had a high court writ served against me for the following sums

Judgement Debt: £675.63 and Judgement Costs: £125.70

 

The debt is a private debt for goods supplied.

 

I've had a two official visits from Rossendales High Court enforcement. They have also visited my property 3 times in addition to this without knocking the door. On two occasions the bailiff sat outside my property for around 30 mins. I have not dealt directly with the bailiff David Williams. And have kept all windows and doors locked.

 

They tried to levy 2 vehicles on my drive which I use for self employment. In my view the levy doesn't stand.

 

They are asking for the following fees.

 

HCEO Fees:

 

Percentage of monies recovered: £22.53

Mileage: £13.19

Seizure Fee: £2

Enquiries: £4

Inventory/Valuation Fee: £47.76

Admin fee: £100

Financial Management Fee: £50

First Attendance Fee: £100

 

I have managed to secure the funds to pay the debt and the fees in full. However, I think the fees are excessive so have not called to make payment yet.

 

I have written to Rossendales lodging a formal complaint that the fees are excessive and that the levy is invalid. They refuse to acknowledge my complaints and that the vehicles are for self employment.

I have now contacted their trade association with the details.

 

All the while whilst this is going on it's affecting my business and my day to day life. I'm having to hide my vehicles and i'm worried about incurring further visits and costs not to mention the stress. All I want to do is get it cleared up but I don't want to be paying more than I need to as I'm struggling as it is.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your bailiff isnt certificated http://certificatedbailiffs.justice.gov.uk/CertificatedBailiffs/searchPublic.do?search=David so he may be just an HCEO. This means he cannot enter your property without permission.

 

I wouldnt take too much notice of the fees. Just dispute them.

 

The law prescribing fees chargeable by a High Court Enforcement Officer (HCEO) for collecting unpaid debts is Schedule 3 of Regulation 13 of The High Court Enforcement Officers Regulations 2004.

 

Where the sum due is £100 or less - 5%

Above £100 - 2.5%

Mileage Charges - 29.2p per mile Max £50

Seizure of goods - £2 per site

Signed Walking possession agreement fee - £3.25 a day

 

Its common practice for HCEOs to charge additional fees according to a list and pretend the debtor is liable to pay them. This is not true and you simply dont have the pay them at all.

 

There is the old HCEO's chestnut of adding fees described as "misc" or "miscellaneous". He is trying to use Section 12 of Schedule 3 of the regulations which actually reads:

 

"For any matter not otherwise provided for, such sum as a Master, district judge or costs judge may allow upon application."

 

This is essentially a blank cheque clause because it enables bailiffs to load his fees ad-infinitum then pretend an application has already been made to a Master or a district judge who has allowed the costs. HCEOs tend to do this retrospectively by charging as much as they think they can get away with then leave it up to you to challenge it afterwards, which is almost impossible to reclaim once you have paid it.

 

In short, dispute it, do not pay it and its a civil dispute between you and the HCEO. Additionally, you do not have to let them into your property so keep the chain on the door at all times and you are not obligated to speak with him.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your response fork-it.

 

Yes, he is a HCEO

 

I have disputed the fees already in writing and they've argued that they are fair. Maybe I should mention to them about having to apply to the court for these. "For any matter not otherwise provided for, such sum as a Master, district judge or costs judge may allow upon application."

 

Should I ask for proof that they've done this or will the Enforcement Services Association do that for me as i've contacted them with details of the fees and case as a whole?

 

It still leaves me with the problem of having a writ served against me and me having to hide my cars. It's really starting to get on top of me as a close friend died yesterday and I just want it sorted so I can get on with my life.

 

I've got the money to pay for the judgement debt and costs in full but i've been advised that if I pay Rossendales they'll take the £400+ fees first still leaving the judgement debt and writ in place.

 

I've also got the money for the fees in full but really don't want to pay them or want them reduced to a reasonable level. I also don't want further fees added on top from further visits.

 

It's tying my head in knots. Any further advice would be greatly appreciated :)

Edited by funkyp
spelling and further info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your response fork-it.

 

Yes, he is a HCEO

 

I have disputed the fees already in writing and they've argued that they are fair. Maybe I should mention to them about having to apply to the court for these. "For any matter not otherwise provided for, such sum as a Master, district judge or costs judge may allow upon application." Not actually necessary

 

Should I ask for proof that they've done this or will the Enforcement Services Association do that for me as i've contacted them with details of the fees and case as a whole? Sorry but this is the wrong Trade Assoc - you need the HCEOA, but it's a pointless exercise as all the trade bodies are self funded by their membership.

 

It still leaves me with the problem of having a writ served against me and me having to hide my cars. It's really starting to get on top of me as a close friend died yesterday and I just want it sorted so I can get on with my life.

 

I've got the money to pay for the judgement debt and costs in full but i've been advised that if I pay Rossendales they'll take the £400+ fees first still leaving the judgement debt and writ in place. Have you tried the sneaky one - seeing if the original Claimant will accept the cash?

I've also got the money for the fees in full but really don't want to pay them or want them reduced to a reasonable level. I also don't want further fees added on top from further visits. The majority of the HCEO fees can be challenged.

It's tying my head in knots. Any further advice would be greatly appreciated :)

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt even bother saying anyting to him, just tell him they are too high and there is no court order requireing you to pay them. Remind him he commits an offence under Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1940 if he pretends to have a court order. The less you say the better.

 

I wouldnt bother writing to any trade associations, such as the Enforcement Services Association, they are private Ltd companies. Not industry regulators or statuutory bodies.

 

There is no such thing as a reasonable level, the law decides what the fees are. If he over charges you then dont pay him anything. Let him sue you.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt even bother saying anyting to him, just tell him they are too high and there is no court order requireing you to pay them. Remind him he commits an offence under Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1940 if he pretends to have a court order. The less you say the better.

 

I wouldnt bother writing to any trade associations, such as the Enforcement Services Association, they are private Ltd companies. Not industry regulators or statuutory bodies.

 

There is no such thing as a reasonable level, the law decides what the fees are. If he over charges you then dont pay him anything. Let him sue you.

 

Again thanks so much for taking the time to reply. I completely agree with you regarding the fees and I dont want to pay them. However, this leaves me with the problem of settling the judgement debt. I DO want to pay this and the judgement costs now to get it cleared. I would imagine that if I try to pay the judgement off through rossendales they will use that money for their fees and the writ will not be removed. Is this a correct assumption? Ive tried to bypass them and pay the creditor directly but they wont accept it and tell me to do it through rossendales. Im very worried that if I leave it ill get a charge on my house. The creditor are taking me to court again in aug to claim for more fees and interest! They want £170 to stop there proceedings. As you can see they are making it very difficult and causing lots of stress for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it that the order was ''forthwith'' with no alternative payment, so did you default on the

time span for payment, warrants of execution are not normally immediately applied for.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can of course submit 2 forms to the Court.

 

1 - N244 and apply for a Stay of Execution against the HCEO using the grounds that you cannot afford his fees + pending determination of your Variation application.

 

2 - N245 and apply for a Varaiation Order letting you pay at an affordable rate you can afford, you must submit I&E for this.

 

If you are on a low wage or certain benefits you may not have to pay the Court Fees - see Form EX160 for details.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I agree with the advice you've been given here so far and think that if you do have the money for the judgment debt then try to get it paid directly to the Creditor and get a receipt from them. Is it a business or private individual that you owe? If it is a business you might try dealing directly with the accounts department - they very rarely turn down the chance to take a payment, especially if it is past due - often the people in these departments are targeted on collections so will take the money and ask few questions, but really important to get a receipt! Even if it is an individual see if they will take the payment from you.

 

Beyond that work out what you agree with regarding the HCEO fees - pay that and then write to them to confirm that the judgment debt has been settled in full, along with the fees that you believe they are due accourding to the fee schedule and that the balance remains in dispute.

 

Much as I despise the heavy handed approach of the HCEOs and creative accounting abilities when it comes to fees that Enron would have been proud of, you may want to consider trying to settle with them once you have paid the judgment debt and the element of fees that they are legitimately entitled to. If it is causing you grief now then you need to be prepared for the possibility of a protracted battle with them which you should balance against a figure today that will restore your peace of mind.

 

I speak from the experience of a 3 year battle with HCE but then I am a stubborn git at the best of times with an unhealthy interest in the intricacies of law...

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...