Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4728 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In 1999 I stupidly took out a loan of £7000 for a now ex partner. I paid the installments for around 2 years, we then split up and I paid £20 a month. The company at the time sent a guy out to talk to me about my finances and they accepted the £20. This was around 2005. I have paid the £20 each month DD without fail. During this time I received umpteen letters from the debt company who must of bought the debt saying I had to increase or they would take me to court, I told them on numerous occassions I could not afford any more, but the letters kept coming. Then they sent solicitors letters from Cope's. The debt co. now is Arrow Finance, I cannot remember the company name when I fisrt took out loan but it did change to Transcom.

In Nov 2008 I wrote to Transcom requesting a copy of the original loan agreement and a further letter enclosing a £10 postal order for a SAR request. They returned the PO and both letters saying this is something they did not do, but they would freeze interest! Like a pillock I just left it and have carried on getting letters from them, I have ignored them but carried on with the £20. The debt about 2 yrs ago was around £8000 now its around £6600. But it's on my credit file as a default and is stopping me from getting a mortgage.

Any help would be gratefully appreciated. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Debt Collection Industry

 

Hopefully help should wend it's way soon

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the original company default you? it falls off 6 years after the original default. In either case I'd wite to whoever put the existing default and tell them that this debt was defaulted by the OC back in 2001 and as such them placing a new one is against the rules. If you fish around you will find the relevant rules which you can enclose. You can also remind them they are in breach of CCA request and if they do not fulfil that request you may withhold further payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that as two and a half years have passed since you last did your requests, it may be better to start from scratch and forget the previous requests.

 

As the account is now with Arrow Finance, I would send it to them. When an account is passed from one creditor to another (as opposed to passing to a DCA) all relevant info should go too. Arrow are now the creditor. They have the responsibility to supply

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, no looking on my credit report, Arrow Global Finance put the default on in 2007.

 

I agree with 'starting over', but the default should have been registered in a timely manner, which means within 6 months of the default occuring. I note you say that your SAR was returned, but this is a legal request and their response is not acceptable. You could send a new request informing them of their legal obligations to do this. What you need is the date of the original default as Arrow should have taken that over and kept the original date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with 'starting over', but the default should have been registered in a timely manner, which means within 6 months of the default occuring. I note you say that your SAR was returned, but this is a legal request and their response is not acceptable. You could send a new request informing them of their legal obligations to do this. What you need is the date of the original default as Arrow should have taken that over and kept the original date.

 

And if they again outright refuse - straight to the Information Commissions Office which I think would be interested to see such a letter.

 

Regarding the default date, it could be that Transcom did an MBNA, did not default the account for a long period as you were in a payment plan. Again such an argument will not wash with the ICO 'As it places you in a worse position than if you had not attempted to pay the debt' (and still are).

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks David, I do feel as If I am in a worse position now. I have thought about stopping the DD as it does not seem to be doing me any favours. I was also thinking about writing to them to see what figure they would settle at.But I am sure I have done this before (can't remember or find any letters) and they would not consider. If I manage to get a SAR from them, is this a record of all my payments to them etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a little confused.

You say Arrow Finance took this account over then you say Arrow Global Finance. Can you confirm which please

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, Arrow Global are debt collectors and as such won't have much info about this debt but you should be sending a CCA request to them to ensure they have the right to be chasing this debt. They may send the request back but we have ways of dealing with that.

Your SAR will have to go to whomever is the original creditor (transcom??) If they refuse to supply, you can report them to the Information Commissioner

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks silverfox, it was Transcom I sent the SAR to back in 2008, they returned it with the £10 PO with a letter (typical can;t find, but I do have my returned letters and they are stamped with Transoms date received stamp) their letter said something in the lines of, we do not deal with these kind of requests!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any company that holds personal data about you has a duty to disclose that information on presentation of a valid request (and payment)

Did they say why the wouldn't deal?

I would still resend the SAR to Transcom. They should have your data

 

If Arrow cannot supply the agreement within 12+2 working days of receipt of your CCA request, you may withhold payment (if you wish) until they do supply.

 

Debt collection Agencies do not normally place defaults. What they do is, when a debt is sold, the DCA replaces the original creditors name with their own so it looks like Arrow defaulted you but it's more likely the way I just described.

 

As has already been stated, this default should have been placed shortly after you fell into arrears which certainly wasn't 2007. When (if) you get back your account history from your SAR, this should show when the default was placed.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love them to try that line again. The ICO would have a field day

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the only address I can find

 

Transcom House

Unit F

The Courtyard

Alban Park

Hatfield Road

St Albans

Herts

AL4 0LA

 

Mark it for the attention of the data controller

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like Transcom are also Debt collectors so what you really want from them is who the original creditor was as well as the data they are holing

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...