Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LloydsTSB PPI claim questions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4551 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello chaps

I am new to all this PPI stuff and am in fact finding it all a little bit daunting to say the least.

 

I have two separate loans with LloydsTSB,

one started in

August 2006 and it was for £7000 to be paid back over 84 months

 

and the other was started in

May 2008 and was for £3000 to be paid back over 60 months.

 

I had to sign for both these loans but on both occasions was told by the bank worker that my chances of getting the loans would be affected if I didnt take out PPI.

 

On both occasions I was subjected to lengthy lectures about how unstable the economy was

and that my job security meant that loans might not be granted unless I had some form of cover for unemployment or sickness and that PPI was available,

in effect they made me feel like it was a privilege to be offered such cover,

 

I felt pressured into taking out the cover and was already desperate for the money and so was easy to manipulate.

 

Both my interviews were also late in the afternoon and it was almost like they spent ages scaring me about the PPI

and then before I knew it closing time was approaching and I was rushed.

 

I went in to my local branch the other day to see where I might stand regarding a claim

because the payments are now crippling me because of rising living costs and a lack of pay rises in my field

and was told by a member of staff that because I had signed for the loans and that they were taken out within the last five years

that LloydsTSB have point blank refused to pay anyone within that time frame

and that nobody would listen anyway because it would be my word against theirs,

in fact he even had the audacity to try and pressuring me to continue with the PPI cover after I had asked about cancelling.

 

If I signed for these loans then surely my only option is just to cancel them and not claim, my signature surely means "I Agreed" :|

Can anyone shed some light on all this for me please, I just dont know where I stand.

 

Regards

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Utter BS and those staff should be named and shamed to the manager or the CEO..

 

 

however....

 

your case is 999% typical of all PPI fleecing and you should reclaim the lot.

 

the best idea

is to have a look at the PPI PDF's on the FOS website

and find the one that closely matches your loan

and follow the instructions contained within

 

watch Lloyds - they are notorious for underhand interest calcs on reclaims so you've been warned!

 

comeback here when you need further help

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick reply dx100uk, and also thanks for the words of encouragement.

I'm really daunted by all this, I'm struggling with my finances at the moment and not and much in the way of pay rises for a long time, it doesnt help with the rising costs of bills and fuel and stuff, although yesterday the bank worker just shrugged his shoulders at me and said "you are not unique, you should tighten your belt more".

I trusted the bank, never ever thought they might rip me off, naive I know but back then I didnt have much experience with banking and stuff, how times have changed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have been told that I cannot cancel my PPI payments on these two loans because that will make it harder to claim back what I have already paid, is this true ?

The PPI adds a fair amount to my monthly payments and it would be better for me if I can stop them now without it affecting my claim, or should I continue paying the insurance.

 

Regards

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been told that I cannot cancel my PPI payments on these two loans because that will make it harder to claim back what I have already paid, is this true ?

The PPI adds a fair amount to my monthly payments and it would be better for me if I can stop them now without it affecting my claim, or should I continue paying the insurance.

 

Regards

Alan

 

Sounds like a complete red herring to me. Who said this to you?!

NatWest: seeking unlawful charges + interest incurred as a result of those charges of £4,292.82 and contractual interest (compounded) of £4,559.41. Court claim issued 16.01.08; acknowledgement of service filled by Cobbetts on 30.01.08

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a complete red herring to me. Who said this to you?!

 

Hi Fred

It was a LloydsTSB advisor that told me, he said I would have to continue paying PPI until it had been settled because cancelling it makes it harder to claim.

He said LloydsTSB would not ever pay out on a loan that was signed for because a signature is an acceptance of the PPI agreement so I asked if it was possible to cancel any future payments and he said yes I could cancel but doing that would make the ombudsmen look on the case different when I eventually sent my claim to them after I had been refused by LloydsTSB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a load of twaddle. How does he know you'll even involve the ombudsman? You might decide to go to court instead. I'd ignore him and proceed as advised.

 

ims

 

So you reckon it would be ok to cancel my PPI ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me I would cancel them. Don't pussyfoot around with Lloyds...TELL them you want them cancelled. Put it in writing. It is time to start a paper trail for your claim.

 

Have you followed the advice from dx regarding research?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me I would cancel them. Don't pussyfoot around with Lloyds...TELL them you want them cancelled. Put it in writing. It is time to start a paper trail for your claim.

 

Have you followed the advice from dx regarding research?

 

ims

 

It is all confusing stuff, I am looking at the claim forms right now and question 4 asks for the policy number of the payment protection insurance you are claiming for, it later asks (section C1, what was the payment protection insurance sold to cover you for) what was the account number for this, this number should be different to the insurance policy number you filled in on page 1.

I have two forms, one with loan reference number on it and one with loan account number and they are both the same, I have already fallen at the first hurdle :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

its only a questionaire

 

put what you think is correct

what you dont know write N/A

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is all confusing stuff, I am looking at the claim forms right now and question 4 asks for the policy number of the payment protection insurance you are claiming for, it later asks (section C1, what was the payment protection insurance sold to cover you for) what was the account number for this, this number should be different to the insurance policy number you filled in on page 1.

I have two forms, one with loan reference number on it and one with loan account number and they are both the same, I have already fallen at the first hurdle :oops:

 

I have 2 blackhorse loans that I'm claiming on and was told by blackhorse to put the same number in as they didn't issue seperate insurance policy numbers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have 2 blackhorse loans that I'm claiming on and was told by blackhorse to put the same number in as they didn't issue seperate insurance policy numbers.

 

Thanks for that xboxer, it would certainly make sense, besides I would think my loan reference number is unique to me so they should be able to pull all the details using that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that xboxer, it would certainly make sense, besides I would think my loan reference number is unique to me so they should be able to pull all the details using that.

 

 

 

:thumb:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Well I thought I'd post an update regarding my ppi claim, it was successful in that I finally got a response from them after dealing with them directly. They are paying me £3400 back, they said on the 10th of this month they would send me a cheque or pay it directly in to my TSB platinum account. Haha no chance, I logged on to my account yesterday to find one of my loans (£2600 left to pay) had mysteriously disappeared so I phoned the loans department and they said they had used part of my ppi award to clear one of my loans and tomorrow they are going to use the remainder to pay off my other smaller (£1100) loan.

Surely this is not legal, in the past when I have asked for settlement figures they have sent me a letter with that figure and a slip that has to be signed by me giving permission to settle.

I have paid that ppi money with my own hard earned wages, how can they take it and clear my existing loans just like that, is this actually legal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

With a loan they can only set off against notified arrears...not the whole loan.

 

Depends on the status of these loans I would guess....were there significant, or indeed, any arrears on them?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then you need to complain.

 

they can only off-set against notified arrears.

 

write back and ask them where in the industry & FOS PPI guideline it

states they are allowed to off-set against other borrowing the does not have notified arrears

 

neither of my accounts are in arrears.

 

please refund MY money as a cheque or BACS so I can decided where the money goes not lloyds

 

i have many other debts that equally or more entitled to this money

than for lloyds to 'swallow' it up for their own embetterment.

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...