Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Orange / Mackenzie Hall - Best way forward please


Faith
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4813 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I am helping to sort any lurking past problems for my son who despite having turned his corner may have some ' financially challenging ' situations in his past. Having spent a couple of days reading here it appears he is just one of the current batch of the Orange / Arrow targets.

 

Brief synopsis: Febuary - letter arrived from Arrow Global Guernsey Ltd stating they had been assigned a debt, now owned, from Orange, via Everything Everywhere. We had no knowledge of this debt and ignored it.

 

March - a letter from Mackenzie Hall stating they are now the DCA for Arrow. Being a hoarder I climbed into loft for the archive box and have found old threatagrams from 2006 from a different DCA. We are not even sure what they were pertaining to at that time and were duly ignored. Certainly there has been no contact since then from anyone.

 

I can say in all honesty neither of us know what the debt is for, clearly phone ? Broadband ? But can't recall any.

 

Can I just confirm that a ' Prove it ' letter is the way to go first ? And should it be sent to Mackenzie Hall or the alledged owners Arrow? I only ask as the letter from Arrow expressly says that all comms / monies to go to Mackenzie hall.

 

I know a CCA is not relevant in this case, but what is available in it's place to determine this so called debt / account?

 

Now off to prepare thread for massive Lloyds / PPI problem HELPPPP lol

 

Many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have no idea of the nature of the debt, then yes a "prove it" letter would always be the first step.

 

Have you checked your credit file to see if there is anything listed from Orange?

 

normally the final bill/statement would be acceptable, but they will often be reluctant to provide this because it would demonstrate any charges which have been added to the account

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you....

Ummm I clearly have much to learn...how do I check my credit file? Is it one of these credit reports you can buy from Experian etc? absolutely yes

Sorry ( hangs head in shame )

 

We all started off knowing nothing, so please don't feel embarrassed

 

You can get a copy of your credit file for as little as £2, don't sign up for any sort of membership thing, you just need to see who is recording what on you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your kind understanding ....

Now while not missing the obvious is there a direction someone can point me in to get this file please ?

And is it available to arrange on the t'internet?

I have googled and all require signing up to some agreement or another....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, statutory report ordered and paid for. ' Prove it ' letter ready to go recorded tomorrow.....should I be doing anything else?

Also without the ability to ask for a CCA, is there another template I need to send to gain the details they have?

Many thanks again for making this an easy to follow helpful procedure....and I hope you are all about to help me unvavel the hideous Lloyds screw up I have to unravel !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, statutory report ordered and paid for. ' Prove it ' letter ready to go recorded tomorrow.....should I be doing anything else?

Also without the ability to ask for a CCA, is there another template I need to send to gain the details they have?

Many thanks again for making this an easy to follow helpful procedure....and I hope you are all about to help me unvavel the hideous Lloyds screw up I have to unravel !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, statutory report ordered and paid for. ' Prove it ' letter ready to go recorded tomorrow.....should I be doing anything else?

Also without the ability to ask for a CCA, is there another template I need to send to gain the details they have?

Many thanks again for making this an easy to follow helpful procedure....and I hope you are all about to help me unvavel the hideous Lloyds screw up I have to unravel !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening everyone,

An update - not heard anything from the DCA yet but the credit report has arrived. It does show Arrow Global - communications - listed and that it is in default. Says it was started in 2005 and defaulted in May 2006. There is not however any reference to Orange, either as the original account or a credit reference / account in their own right. Quite simply the only reference to this ' debtl ' is from arrow.

I have already sent a prove it letter, not signed and sent recorded, last week. So what is the best way forward please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing has changed, the Credit report simply demonstrates who (if anyone) has applied defaults to your account. Arow could simply be updating the original entry made by Orange

 

You are still awaiting their reply to your "prove it" letter, so until you receive this, just be patient

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say started in 2005 and defaulted in 2006. Does that mean the last payment was made in 2005? If that's the case its close to being statute barred - that means there's a six year period when firms like arrow and mackenze hall can chase for payments and take legal action to enforce it. Once the six year time is up they can ask for payment but cannot enforce it. Once you tell them you have no intention of paying - and why should you, its an organe matter, they have washed their hands of it for a few pounds - they are supposed to give up. Do you know when in 2005 the "matter started"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spamheed, thank you, I'll now wait with bated breath! Is their a time limit on the 'Prove it ' letter that they have to comply with?

 

Nailpost, The start date was 02/12/05, default was 15/05/06. Have no idea when last payment was made as don't really know what the debt is for, obviousloy some form of communications but thats all we know. We certainly have no paperwork of any sort.

 

It also says ' file updated for the period 10/10/10, does this mean anything?

Edited by Faith
Link to post
Share on other sites

The six year period starts from the date of the last payment. It will therefore become statute barred sometime before December this year and will certainly be so if you have acknowledged the debt or made any further payments since then. If Mackenzie Hall have not yet provided you with any paperwork to back uptheir demands and you written demanding they prove it there is nothing more to do or say until they comply. If that takes the illiterates who staff their palatial offices the next eight months to find the right crayon in the box then so be it. Just keep an eye on your credit report in case something else is entered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...