Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK but it's always best to scan up these letters you mention so We can decide proper actions/responce/use please scan them all to one mass pdf in date order.  Read upload use the online sites listed Dx
    • Instead of ridiculing them you could point out the embarrassment they will have in the papers if they persist in being in Court with a little old lady. it also won't look good for their landowners since negative comments afffect them too.
    • I'm going to say they haven't complied with the PAP although they did write saying they would be issuing a court claim in their letter they also state I had an agreement with OVO which they have a copy of the agreement and its terms and condition which I have definitely not seen. Also I've technically never had an agreement with OVO but with SSE I didn't even realise they had sold to them until this letter!
    • I have had a pre "warning" from TM Legal regarding 2 old debts stating they are going to send a claim form in email. I was sent a PAP form which i responded to on both but like a melt i sent their PAP pack back to them in my request for CCA etc using the CAG response form. I have not to my knowledge received a response for either. my question is, will sending their pack back cause me issues in the future? can I request they send this back to me?
    • Your consumer rights within six months If a product develops a fault within the first six months after purchase, it’s assumed it has been there since the time of purchase. This means it’s up to the retailer to prove it wasn’t there when you bought it. If a repair or replacement has failed, you have the right to reject the goods for a full refund or price reduction. Your consumer rights after six months If a fault develops after six months, it’s up to you to prove it was faulty at the time of purchase or delivery.   .
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Brazenly mislead by Life Insurance Company


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4858 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I need some advice, please.

 

Long story short:

 

Met a girl and fell in love.

 

Married in 1987. Was blessed with a child almost a year to the day, later.

 

Decided we needed some life insurance.

 

Took out a policy (not the cheapest).

 

Divorced 18 years later but kept policy on.

 

Lost my job in 2006 and struggled on with policy.

 

Unable to meet payments anymore, late 2009.

 

Was contacted by Company and when I explained I couldn't afford it any more, I was informed that they would put it "on-hold" for up to 12 months and that it was now (then) considered to be "paid up". There was a surrender value of some £2,500 that I could leave where it was or claim it whenever I wanted.

 

I left it where it was (so that I wouldn't be tempted to fritter it away). I also hoped to obtain work and restart the policy which I was informed I could do, provided I left the cash in there but that I would not be able to, if I "cashed it in".

 

A few months later, I was contacted again and informed that the policy had now "lapsed" as my fund was exhausted.

 

Seems that, contrary to my understanding, they had continued drawing the monthly payments from the surrender value until that was exhausted.

 

Can they do that? (despite not having made it clear that that was their intention - in fact, when I asked if I could leave the surrender value with them until a later date, they had said "yes").

 

I can't believe that, having been informed of my (and my family's) dire financial straits and despite them already having been paid c£500 per month for over 20 years, they still "milked" me for the last drop.

 

Any advice greatly appreciated.

Edited by harry.potless
Forgot something
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just came back to review this and see that "Google Search" have already been and had a look.

 

Does Google track EVERY post on EVERY bulletin board?

 

Makes Big Brother (George Orwell's - not Channel 4's) look like an amateur setup.

 

Browned-off with being treated like a pawn/victim.

 

Someone should tell Google et al that "with great power comes great responsibility".

 

Never read your daughter's diary, is my motto.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. Yes, I believe a life assurance company can use the surrender value to pay premiums, usually in order to keep the life cover going. But you say they told you it was Paid Up. Do you have that in writing?

 

My best, HB

 

Hi Honeybee,

 

Thanks for taking the care to respond.

 

Yes, I have it verified in August of 2009 that the Policy is in a "Paid Up" status but am further informed that I can reinstate the Policy within 13 months, provided I repay all missing premiums. I was also advised that what that all means is that, "because you're not paying in, you don't have any Life-Cover as such, but you have a monetary value in there....that you can claim at any time".

 

In March, 2010 I received another communication stating that "the plan has now been surrendered" (so much for the 13 months grace period).

 

When I queried this and asked for my "surrender value" I was only then informed that it had none as the monies referred to earlier had been used to continue paying into (what I had previously been advised was a Paid-Up") the Plan.

 

Any ideas on my course of action, at all?

 

Thanks again,

 

Harry P.

Edited by harry.potless
Addendum
Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that doesn't sound right and that maybe they didn't make your policy paid up when they said they had. I'm guessing, have never done this type of work.

 

Have you gone through the company's complaints procedure? I would do that first, then look at maybe the fos if you're not happy.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...