Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You're right of course, just jarring when an actual man child is knocking on my door so close to the end. Anyway, I'll keep this thread updated if ever any exciting does actually happen. Thanks again.
    • Yes I think you are right. I have to say I think most people would be honest and you would be unlucky to be with somebody who was going to rip you off
    • Would this be OK to send or is it too much detail already ?   "In response to your letter dated  xxx Intention of Prosecution reference xxxxxx I would like to advise that no collision / accident took place at the given date / time / location. There was however an altercation with the driver of a commercial vehicle who punched and kicked my car, verbally abused me when I stopped and acted in a distinctive threatening and aggressive manner. I advised I would be reporting him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching and kicking my car whilst driving past in the road. When I tried to take a photo of his number plate, he came towards me in a further aggressive and threatening manner, so I decided to retreat into my car and lock the doors before he could reach me, as I was frightened he may assault me. I drove off and when I checked my phone later , the photo was regrettably unusable, as the camera couldn’t focus properly when I rushed back to my car. So I decided not to report him for his threatening behaviour and actions, as at the time I believed he would be untraceable anyway. So I am not sure if the accusations against me are in relation to this altercation, but no actual collision took place at this time , date and location as alleged in your letter"  
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • They have been sending messageslike " Do you want a refund or not"  which ive said im at work just try and avoid their childish obstuctive replies as ive had enough of them but i plan on going up tomorrow , so my question is,  they have to give me a refund dont they, they can not bargain or refuse the refund if they havent checked the phone first ? Their previous messages have said they want to check the phone first before a refund is given and i think theyll try this tomorrow as they have argued all through this .... If that happens can i just walk away and then send the letter of Particulars which is due next week ? Edit :   Just for the record the phone hasnt been used since buying its been put in a protective bag and put in a draw , its in the same condition as i bought it
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Is talking to colleagues gross micconduct whist suspended


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4821 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi i am curently suspended having had 3 hearing so far for failing to act in my role as manager in the protection of vuneralbal adults . If i an caught contacting fellow workers and discussing the case is this gross misconduct . They have printed off 1 private email transcript off my work blackberry showing i have very naughty but because its a work phone they can read my private e mails cos the all go to same in box , but thats a different story

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

All I can say is that in recent years I have known 4 people put on suspension pending an investiagtion in to whatever, that could lead to (and did in 3 of the cases, 1 being my wife), disiplinary action and in all cases the employers said (written and verbal), that contact with anyone inside the company while on suspension is not allowed and if caught could be seen as gross misconduct in itself.

 

I would say that it sounds like your in enough hot water already, regardless if the info above is right or wrong, it's not worth the risk and I wouldn't do it if I were you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I agree with themoonscrescent. This cropped up on the forum recently and I believe the advice was not to contact colleagues. You have enough problems already, please wait until someone with more expertise than me to comment with more definitive advice before you do anything else.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, is there contractual provision that states that you are not to contact colleagues in this circumstance, or have you been instructed not to do so whilst suspended?

Probably best to play it safe and not contact anyone, or, if you feel it necessary to do so for the purpose of defending yourself (ie. contacting a colleague to ask if they will accompany you to a disciplinary hearing), notify your employers in advance of your intentions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. don't do it

2. lets start again you have simple but helpful missing words in your post, detail is welcome here :)

3. If you are suspended for failure to protect VA's as a manager, talking to your colleagues would not be my first concern, the allegation would be!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are suspended for failure to protect VA's as a manager, talking to your colleagues would not be my first concern, the allegation would be!

 

I would agree! But I am assuming that (inserting some probable missing words) you have done it already and the have found it?

 

A suspension is there to separate you from your work colleagues to allow an investigation to go on, and in serious cases (although many employers abuse the practice) that is what is happening. It is to allow the investigation to take place without your possible interference - and for your protection so that nobody can allege that you have tried to "get at" potential witnesses. If you have already done it, there is very little that can be done about it - even without the original allegation it is unlikely that the outcome would be anything other than dismissal. If you haven't done it already - see (1) above and don't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...