Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Checking hi-tech with low tech - Wales leading the way Growing Mid Wales, an organisation set up to bring together the private and public sectors alongside the Welsh Government, has launched a mobile mapping project to track areas of poor mobile phone signal Powys and Ceredigion. They will be using bin lorries which have signal detection equipment installed, and thus able to create a comprehensive map of mobile 'not-spots' in the area, since those vehicles will be visiting just about every property in the area on their usual rounds. Just a moment... WWW.THINKBROADBAND.COM  
    • Hi there   thank you for the reply. No, it's not a silly question at all. I am convinced I didn't hit anything with my car. I was going very slowly and it was the guy standing next to his lorry in the road who punched and kicked my car as I went by. It's cause I saw him do it in the mirror.  I initially thought he did it because he thought I was passing him maybe too closely whilst he was messing around with his lorry ?  That's why I stopped and got out and asked what he thought he was doing hitting my car. He then just hurled abuse at me. Not making any accusations such 'you hit me' 'you hit my lorry' or you did this or that. He just swore and shouted at me. At which point I said I would be making a complaint to his company for his threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I went to my car , got my phone to take a photo of his number plate but then he came towards me again and I thought if he now hits me I am going to come second. I am a woman in her mid 50s travelling on her own and this guy looked like a Millwall football supporter (short, rotund, skin head) so I decided to leave this situation. I got back in my car closed the door and drove off before he could reach me.  I later checked my phone and noticed the photo was too blurred, as I turned and rushed back to my car too quickly before the camera could focus. So I thought it was pointless making a complaint as the guy couldn't be traced anyway, so I forgot all about it until yesterday. But this is all I can think of, it must have to do with this incident as it is in the same street.   
    • Please read the following thread very carefully. It is extremely relevant where you are suing Evri on the basis of a contract which you originally made with Packlink who are domiciled in Spain. A judgement has been obtained and we have applied for transcript and it will be put up on this thread as soon as we receive it probably about the end of July. In the meanwhile, read this thread, see what has been discovered about the Packlink/Evri/customer relationship and look at the witness statement very carefully. It's a long thread but don't give up. Once you have the transcript of the judgement, then I will do a more careful and explanatory post here   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/459707-evri-lost-my-ebay-parcel-£844-court-claim-issued-judgment/
    • So if the breach occurred say Dec 2017 (first missed payment) and the default notice was issued Sept 2018 and the claim was issued 7th June 24 the claimant will of course be arguing it is within the limitation period (by 3 months)
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

vectra timing belt.


jimandsue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4530 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, First time on so please bear with.

 

I drive a 2002 Vauxhall Vectra cd which I bought from new. About ten days ago it started mis-firing so I took it to my local garage. They had to strip the head off to find out what was going on and found that the timing chain tensioner had come appart which had caused the chain to slackern and jump two cogs. This threw out the timing (hence the mis-fire) which then bent 12 of the 16 valves.

The cost of the repair and rebulid is just short of £1000. On investigation through Vauxhall it appears that they had expreienced problems with chain tensioners on this particular model at this time, as the vectra design and shape were being re-newed. Vauxhall then agreed to compensate drivers who had experienced trouble with timing chains on this car and year, but only upto 2007.

I have owned this car from new and have never been asked to check the tensioner or had the car re-called. The first time I heard there was a problem was when it broke.

Has anyone out there heard or experienced this problem, or can offer any advise on how I might push for compensation. P.S. the car has done 79,000 from new and has been regularilly serviced.

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if there was a provable national recall (an there is a website to check this thoguh i cant remember it) you might be OK to get vauxhall to fix it. However i have a sneaking suspicion you will need to take it on the chin in the short term!! doesnt strike me as something that will get sorted quickly1!

Link to post
Share on other sites

what engine size is it?

you should be on your second cambelt by now have you had it changed in the past? were the tensioners changed then?

vauxhall and there cambelts and associated bits are a bit of a weak point

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replys ninjainthenight and worndown. The vectra is a 2.2 petrol with a timing chain, not belt. I would have expected a chain and tensioner to last more than 78,000, indeed I never even thought about checking it until this happened. As I mentioned before, Vauxhall have admitted problems with their chain and tensioners during the change over from this model design to the new model but will only compensate for problems descovered and reported upto the year 2007. It seems that after that date you have to "take it on the chin" as ninjainthenight puts it. They didn't mention that to me when I bought the thing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the 2.2's did have problems with there chains and the lubrication system on them.

 

there was a customer satisfaction program on these and a modified system was fitted to cars after march 2002;

 

this is the details on it;

 

Vauxhall TIS

Field Remedy: 1532

Subject: Engine Z22SE - Broken Timing Chain

Models: Engines: Option:

Astra-G 2000...2002,VX220 2000...2002,Speedster 2000...2002,Zafira 2000...2002,Vectra-B 2000...2001 Z22SE,Z22SE,Z22SE,Z22SE,Z22SE

Complaint: Engine damaged by broken timing chain.

Cause: Missing or unsufficient lubrication of the timing chain.

Production: Modified timing chain and lubrication nozzle have been introduced in production as of the following engine-No: 11065400 (March 2002).

 

Remedy:

Note: Please check first if the car is included in Service Campaign 03-P-24.

 

In case of customer complaint please use for the necessary repair the timing

chain kit. This kit contains the modified timing chain and lubrication nozzle.

Note: This Quick Information is valid for all Z22SE engines upon customer

complaint.

Spare-Parts: Qty: Part-No.: Catalog-No.:

Timing Chain Repair Kit 1 12577385 56 36 400

Gasket, Cover, Oil Pump 1 90537915 06 46 295

Gasket, Cylinder Head Cover 1 90537319 06 07 494

Gasket, Oil Pump to Cylinder Block 1 24435052 06 46 902

Seal, Ring, Crankshaft Front 1 90571925 06 38 199

Screw, Hex. HD., Damper to Crankshaft 1 90537363 06 14 927

Labour Times: TC: Hours:

U3 153 20 Install timing chain service kit Astra G, 92 3.0

Astra G Coupe, Astra G Convertible

U3 153 21 Install timing chain service kit Zafira A 92 3.3

U3 153 22 Install timing chain service kit 92 3.7

Vectra B (w/o A/C)

001 Additional work Vectra B(with Air Condition) 92 1.1

U3 153 23 Install timing chain service kit 92 4.6

Speedster, VX220

U3 153 24 Repair engine 92

The costs for this repair will be covered for vehicles until 31.12.2007 and

a mileage lower than 100.000 Km.

The regular warranty procedure should be used for claiming Set-up-time.

 

It looks like that you need to check your engine number to see what version you have but it looks unlikely that anyone will help im afraid

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's important to point out here exactly what a "recall" is. There are two types and over the last couple of years it seems apparent that some posters seem to believe that there is some obligation by the manufactuer to honour these.

 

Recalls fall into two categories. 1. A recall instigated by the manufactuer themselves 2. A recall instigated in conjunction with VOSA or any other countries regulatory body.

 

Predominantly recalls instigated by VOSA are safety related and have no end date. The manufactuer has to cover a high percentage of vehicles affected within a set range of VIN numbers and only when this figure has been achieved are they allowed to close it down.

 

In the case of 1. which this post falls under, the manufactuer has identified an issue and will actively pursue the cars upto a certain point, generally 5 years but it depends on the type of issue. There is a clear cut off point ie a date.

 

The unfortunate part of this policy is that invariably cars leave the dealer network after 3 years or so they have no way of checking where they are and as it it not a VOSA driven recall do not make use of the expensive tracing facillites that are available.

 

Recalls should also not be confused with quality campaigns where the manufactuer might update software or change something for a more durable part.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hi

 

Interestingly I have a 2005 Vectra 2.2i auto and have just had a conversation with both the dealer and vauxhall customer service who have advised that my car is outside of the range for repair of the timing chain tensioner. Could be facing a bill of £1000!! :-x

 

The next steps are for a vauxhall garage to inspect it, which I am liable for, and then Vauxhall MAY provide a good will gesture dependent on the results...... this seems to be an extremely common fault.

 

Now having to write to the Managing Director to see if I have any recourse .... not sure where this will get me?! Has anyone else gone down this avenue and if so, was it a favourable outcome or am I wasting my time?!

 

PS *having now had three costly manufacturing faults with vauxhall it will be last time I buy vauxhall .... seems they need to sort there supply chain or quality inspection issues out!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I suggest you satrt your own thread Ragdoll? You don't seem to be attracting any advice here. this thread is almost a year old!

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...