Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All, I'm looking for help with a P2G claim for another lost parcel. Given the wealth of information on this site, I'm hopeful that this should be an easy one to fix, but want to be sure I have everything. On the 6th March, I contracted with P2G to send a parcel (a £600 Pioneer AVH-Z7200DAB car stereo which is not on either P2G or EVRi's excluded from compensation or prohibited items list) using EVRi, sent it off, and that was the last I heard of it. The EVRi tracking showed that the parcel had made it to the national sorting hub at 2:12 on the 7th, and then vanished. By Friday, I had started to get nervous, and so, raised an enquiry. And then another, and another - well, they weren't responding, and I couldn't get their telephone one to work, I think in all, it was more than 15 enquiries. I also raised an investigation with P2G as well. EVRi closed the enquiry confirming a loss on the 19th March, and P2G near the end, although P2G closed it claiming that I needed to send photos of the parcel as proof - which I didn't have, and I also do not have an account with P2G so couldn't upload anything (I did test, just in case), and this is why despite receiving advice on the EVRi Fb group to send the letter before claim, I haven't yet acted. I have proof of the eBay listing, and the refund, to demonstrate that which was being sent, but P2G's insistence that I have no photographic proof of the parcel with the label - I have the photo of the goods in their box before sending, but this is for the eBay listing, and so does not show it after the fact. This I fear is what P2G will seek to rely on as a defence, hence my 10 week delay on progressing with this. But, I am more than £600 out of pocket for the loss: £600 for the item and £8.04 for the delivery fee, although my claim will actually be for an initial £611.09 to cover the cost of the loss, their delivery fee, and my 1st Class Recorded stamp for the Letter Before Claim to P2G, rising to £681.09 to cover the additional £70 cost of opening the court case if they fail to respond within 14 days. This question mark surrounding P2G's request for photographic evidence, is this likely to cause me a problem? Steve
    • Had a letter response today dated 12/6/24 from PRA Group re request for information consumer credit act 1974. Confirming they are in receipt of my CCA letter request - and that they are requesting the required information. They returned the £1 postal order. And my CCA letter. Stating that they will contact me with an update ASAP. They attached/included a standard ( non personal ) page about ' what they should provide ' and ' what happens If I don't get this information'.    I need to file my defence by 21 June 24. Any suggestions as to what that defence should be ?   
    • Thanks @dx100uk for responding promptly.    To be quite honest with you, applying for breathing space might not really help except some short term relief. I don’t want to default either as I might lose my job too and I cannot really afford it. Sorry for sounding bit stupid but is there something I can do to stop them charging interest and agree on reduced payments? I am working on information that @BankFodderhas requested and will be sharing it later today.  
    • who said send the sb letter to RC anyway? we said the debt owner not the grease monkey.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCJ Threat - Seven Trent Water


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4909 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I have today received a letter from Seven Trent water claiming I owe them over £350 when I have only lived in my flat for less that 7 months.

 

They claim they have filed a CCJ against me and if I don't pay it ASAP they will go for judgement againts me for the whole amout plus court fees etc.

 

I am not going to lie, I have made some payments to them and I have missed others but there is no way I owe that amount.

 

The letter came in a bright orange evelope with two blue stripes down it, and telemessage written on it, very professional I must say :!:

 

I have had no contact from any Debt Collection Agency. I am on JSA and after I have paid out for food, heating, electric I am left with just over £5.

 

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure what you're looking for - a Telemessage was a replacement service to Telegrams when the Post Office disbanded their courier service. It was run by BT for a while, but was sold off as it didn;t make much money. It is now usually utilised by Utility companies as part of their in-house Debt collection processes.

 

You don;t say whether your water is metered, but if not you will have been billed for whatever amount is due and you're expected to pay this along with gas, electric and telecom. Missing a payment (from a monthly plan) usually terminates this facility and the remainder is required to be paid, and in full. It would appear that it is this they are trying to collect. They will add their legal costs to the amount owing, and the CCJ will be recorded by Registry Trust and shown on your credit file.

 

Your only solution is to work it out with then, but they may not be interested if the original payment plan failled - all you can really do is ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have not filed a CCJ against you as this can only happen after you have received summons and gone through the court process and lost. Even then you still have 28 dasy before the CCJ is marked up on ylour credit file.

We have a 2 bedroom bungalow in the Severn Trent area with a garden and we are metered. For the two of us the bill is less than £300 a year so may be worth considering changing to metered water if yu can otherwise the bill for the full year would be about £380..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as councils have no need to actually arrange a court hearing, utilities (like water) do not have to

do this either. It is an administrative function, and a CCJ can be awarded simply because the debt is owed and the debtor refuses to pay. Despite water being privatised in E&W, this enforcement ability was never withdrawn. (In Scotland, where water is still public - it is the councils who collect the 'Water Rates' as part of the Council tax, so paying one pays the other. Fail to pay, and there's no need to go to court as a Judgement will follow, followed by Sheriff Officers to collect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, I have today received a letter from Seven Trent water claiming I owe them over £350 when I have only lived in my flat for less that 7 months.

 

They claim they have filed a CCJ against me and if I don't pay it ASAP they will go for judgement againts me for the whole amout plus court fees etc.

 

I am not going to lie, I have made some payments to them and I have missed others but there is no way I owe that amount.

 

The letter came in a bright orange evelope with two blue stripes down it, and telemessage written on it, very professional I must say :!:

 

I have had no contact from any Debt Collection Agency. I am on JSA and after I have paid out for food, heating, electric I am left with just over £5.

 

Any advice?

 

 

Not sure if this will help but my dad told me about when he owed severn trent about 700 pounds about 15 years ago and couldnt afford to pay. It turns out that he went to CAB and they told him that water authoities had a slush fund for people who couldnt afford to pay their overdue bills but it can only be agreed to through CAB negotiating. ST wont admit it exists to customers. You need to prove you cant pay but it must be worth a go if you are on JSA. Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

This fund still exists, as it does for all utilities - CAB have no special access to it, it is available to all consuers to apply for, but it remains at the discretion of the utility and requires muchmore than simply an inability to pay, it is means tested and those I spoke to were apalled at the intrusiveness of the questions. Not only that, it isn;t a bottomless pit of funding, a set amount it set aside anually, and usually runs out within the first few months.

 

I get the impression it exists only to let the companies point to it to say they offer charity to those in most need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This fund still exists, as it does for all utilities - CAB have no special access to it, it is available to all consuers to apply for, but it remains at the discretion of the utility and requires muchmore than simply an inability to pay, it is means tested and those I spoke to were apalled at the intrusiveness of the questions. Not only that, it isn;t a bottomless pit of funding, a set amount it set aside anually, and usually runs out within the first few months.

 

I get the impression it exists only to let the companies point to it to say they offer charity to those in most need.

 

That's fair enough, i guess i was only putting forward an opportunity if he really was in a pickle and had no proper income.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are on a water meter, check that the meter readings are correct as this could be an issue causing the large bill.

 

Talk to Severn Trent about your situation; if they aren't aware of your financial difficulty they can't help.

 

The application form for the Severn Trent Trust Fund can be found at http://www.sttf.org.uk/app.htm

 

It's worth giving it a go, even if they turn round and say no, you have tried.

Link to post
Share on other sites

STW Response

 

Dear Mr ****

 

Account Number: **********

Account Balance: £330.54

Claim balance: £330.54

Claim number: 0QP15677

 

Thank you for your Email received on 5 January 2011 regarding the above claim.

 

I can confirm the current outstanding balance on your account is £330.54, this consists of £38.50 in arrears for the period 25 January 2010 until

31 March 2010 and £213.50 in current charges billed for the period 31 March 2010 until 31 March 2011. As no payment has been received despite our best efforts to contact you, a county court claim has been issued against you adding additional costs, fees and interest totalling £78.74.

 

Any reminders sent to your address will have been sent via standard royal mail post, please be advised that the postal service is not an agent of Severn Trent Water Ltd and any issue that you may have regarding the delivery of mail is a third party matter in which Severn Trent Water cannot become involved.

 

In accordance with Parts 27 and 45 of the Civil Procedure Rules (C.P.R.), a Claimant is entitled to include fixed commencement costs and fees when a Claim is issued. The amount of these costs and fees is set out in the C.P.R. and is determined by the Lord Chancellor and not by

Severn Trent Water Ltd. A Claimant is also entitled to include interest in a Claim in accordance with Section 69 of the County Court Act (1984).

 

Billing in advance is in line with our Scheme of Charges, under section 143 of the Water Industry Act 1991. Customers remain liable for payment of the advance charges until they tell us that they have changed address and their responsibility ceased.

 

If you wish to dispute the Claim, you will need to complete the Defence form enclosed within the Claim pack and return it direct to Northampton County Court at the following address:

 

THE COURT MANAGER

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT

ST KATHARINE’S HOUSE

21-27 ST KATHARINE’S STREET

NORTHAMPTON

NN1 2LH

 

If you do not dispute the Claim, full payment should be made immediately direct to Severn Trent Water, Providence Row, Durham, DH1 1RR. Please quote the above Claim and account numbers when making payment. Payment by credit/debit card (excluding American Express) can be made by telephoning 0845 500 500.

 

If you wish to clear the Claim balance, including the costs, fees and interest, by instalments, you will need to complete the Admission form enclosed within the Claim pack and return it to Severn Trent Water Ltd. As a formality, upon receipt of your completed Admission, Judgment will be requested against you. The Judgment Order will be forwarded to you by the Court and will increase the Claim balance to include Judgment costs of £40.00 and any additional interest charges. However, provided the payments are maintained as agreed, the Judgment costs of £40.00 can be removed from your account by contacting Severn Trent Water Ltd once the Claim has been paid in full.

 

Please note that, should you fail to make a formal response to the Claim within Court timescales, Default Judgment may be entered against you, adding further costs of £22.00 and any additional interest charges to your account. These costs are non-refundable. To allow time for you to make a formal response to the Claim, I have suspended any further recovery action on your account for a period of 28 days.

 

I trust this clarifies the situation. Should you have any queries, please telephone

0845 602 2777.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

Andy Holloway

Team Generalist Litigation

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did yu make the paymenst to them? Was it by cash in a PO, by Debit or credit card or some other means where you have proof of payment. When paying, did you quote an account number or did you use a ST Water "payment card" in conjunction with your method of payment with a long number on it? Do you have a record of these payments?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They appear to be aware of you being a resident much longer than seven months. Were the arrears for this or a different property? It looks as though they acknowledge you have made some payments, but as you can see, the recovery costs have seriously pumped up the charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as councils have no need to actually arrange a court hearing, utilities (like water) do not have to

do this either. It is an administrative function, and a CCJ can be awarded simply because the debt is owed and the debtor refuses to pay. Despite water being privatised in E&W, this enforcement ability was never withdrawn. .

 

Are you sure about this? Can you direct to an online authority as I've never come across this in all my years working in the debt advice field. It's pretty interesting!

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I worked in utilities, it was common to get a warrant of execution to cut off electric or gas, but you cannot do this with water although you can restrict the flow of water. A warrant of execution was not a route to a CCJ.

To get a CCJ we had to get a court summons issued onto the person defaulting and then if they did not pay a CCJ would be lodged against them. It was not automatic here in England. This route was seldom followed as it created more hassles than solutions as most defaulters ha dmoved on which is why they did not respond to summons etc so waste of time and money for the utility company. This also applied to businesses as either they had gone down the tubes or they simply did a vanishing act.

Actually wonder if any utility company has ever taken any one to court for bad debt and been successful and got their money as it must be very rare.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The situation will most likely have changed in England since the privatisation of the water industry there (and Wales, I believe). In Scotland and NI, the cost of water is an inherent part of the Council Tax system, where the old Residential 'Water Rates' were rolled into the Council Tax, and the council paid over the assessed amount (based on property size not consumption) to the supplying agency.

 

Therefore, in these areas non payment is an issue for the Council, and Decrees for non payment are a natural part of enforcement, with no requirement for any formal court action - as there is a Statutory Addition of 10% of the amount owing and if this is not paid, a flat fee for the Warrant of Execution. The householder has only one arbiter, the Council. There is no appeal to the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So your post #4 is incorrect, then?

 

No. It is completely correct. CouncilsSTILL have the right to enforce, it has never been withdrawn.

 

How an individual privatised water company decides to enforce non payment is up to them on an individual basis. If they choose to use the Council for enforcement the CCJ is simply rubber stamped. If they do it themselves, they do not have the same powers as the council and will be required to seek a CCJ by conventional means.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Water rates in England and Wales are based on the rateable value of the house which is why it is so disproportionate in some areas, but is no longer connected with the council at all. Bit of a bugger if you are a couple living in a hosue with a high rateable value but yu use 505 less water than your neighbour who has 5 people in his family. Main reason why we switched to a water meter and are now saving nearly £100 per annum even though we have a small garden!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear. Bee in your bonnet time?

 

Sorry, I have no interest in researching matters that are of little relevance to me. The facts stand for themselves - if you wish to seek the information, YOU find out by asking each and every water company what their policy on the matter is. The fact remains, Councils can still purrsue householders for water debts, whether they actually do so in practice is irrelevant. For those in Scotland and NI, Councils enforce non-payment as a matter of routine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear. Bee in your bonnet time?

 

Sorry, I have no interest in researching matters that are of little relevance to me. The facts stand for themselves - if you wish to seek the information, YOU find out by asking each and every water company what their policy on the matter is. The fact remains, Councils can still purrsue householders for water debts, whether they actually do so in practice is irrelevant. For those in Scotland and NI, Councils enforce non-payment as a matter of routine.

I gather that in your own way you are admitting defeat but not acknowledging it. We can live with that! Thanks for input though because others learn through discussion :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defeat? Actually no - my comment was directed at a member of the Site Team who seems intend on point-scoring than information, but no change there. As for the post, I can confirm there are parts of the UK where no court action is required to obtain a CCJ. This remains as accurate now as it was a few hours ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...