Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am heading over to hers tomorrow so I will find out.  Will there be something written in the agreement or does it depend on the agreement its self ? Just so I know what to look for, so I can provide as much information as possible on here. 
    • The answer to this is going to depend on what the agreement your friend signed says. Or contact the housing provider and ask them.  
    • Thank you all for the responses, to answers a few questions  - she has had the car since Jan 23 on a 5 year term.  - She is unsure what the agreement is called, but at the end she has the option to make a payment to "buy" the car - she recieves benefits for her young children alongside the ssp (normally she would be on NLW for a 16 hr a week job)  - Yes she would like to keep the car  She has not responded to the last email from them asking her to call and it'll be followed up in an email. I told her to hold off until atleast Wednesday so I can read a few posts on here and get some more information.  I will ensure she follows up with a letter, that has not been signed but instead her name written.   Thank you  
    • Thanks @lookinforinfo I'll use that. @FTMDave Yep im going to do just that and calmly enjoy the process that follows.    Whats the deal with the quote thing? Is it causing an issue for the site or just an annoyance.
    • Hello, *posting on behalf of my friend, I'll provide as much info as possible*  During a pretty low point my friend moved into a social housing property, it was in a area with no family/friend connections so she started to look for a mutual exchange. She found one, signed the paper work and thought everything was okay.  She has now decided she does not want to go through with the mutual exchange. Is she legally allowed to pull out after signing the paperwork or does she have to commit to the move? Thank you,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Card Debt - Advice please?


fenlon962
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4829 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After successfully having one of my mother-in-law's credit card accounts written off I am now tackling 2 of the remaining 3.

 

24th April I wrote to one requesting copy agreement and statements with no response.

18th November wrote again requesting same.

24th November they responsed with " a copy of the original application was sent by fax on 4th May 2010, we were unable to obtain any copy statements."

 

I do not have a fax number so could not possibly have received anything.

 

Where do I go from here as they cannot supply copy statements? I cannot chase interest charge refund as have no idea of figures.

 

Any help would be appreciated - Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I would be writing back asking how they could fax you when you don't have a fax (are they trying to mislead you?)

 

You say they can't supply copy statements. Is this the original creditor or a DCA? If it a DCA then send a SAR to the original creditor. That should get you back statements

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Quick question, did you send the relevant payments for the SAR and CCA. ie £10 SAR and £1 CCA?

I have had personal dealings in the areas I comment on, however, I am not a lawyer. Any advice I give is without prejudice and is merely my opinion based on the information I have gleaned from my experiences, understanding and interpretation of the law. You should always seek the advice of a qualified legal professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds have a legal obligation to reply within the time limit !

I'd be inclined to send them this letter from the CAG templates

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

Section 7 – Data Protection Act 1998

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account: xxxxxxxx

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated (Insert Date). The disclosure of personal data is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

 

(Adapt this next section to your situation)

 

1) You have failed to provide a complete list of transactions and charges.(Add details of missing period - or a transaction that you know about which is not included)

2) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to any legal action between you and myself.

3) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to instances of manual intervention.

 

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

The time for compliance with my request has now expired. If you do not comply fully with my Subject Access Request within 7 days, I shall apply to the County Court for an order to enforce compliance, together with damages at the discretion of the court.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

[name]

 

 

BLS are just playing games, (Who's ever heard of a DCA not taking payment??).They haven't sent you anything!!

I'd put that account into dispute straight away, and then I'd ignore BLS until they supply a valid CCA or they issue court proceedings, (which they'll never do without the docs).

 

Hope this helps

I have had personal dealings in the areas I comment on, however, I am not a lawyer. Any advice I give is without prejudice and is merely my opinion based on the information I have gleaned from my experiences, understanding and interpretation of the law. You should always seek the advice of a qualified legal professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Adapt the letter to suit, i.e you are not in receipt of anything even though they've cashed your postal order!

I have had personal dealings in the areas I comment on, however, I am not a lawyer. Any advice I give is without prejudice and is merely my opinion based on the information I have gleaned from my experiences, understanding and interpretation of the law. You should always seek the advice of a qualified legal professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update - still heard nothing from either LLoyds or BLS.

 

Separate issue - NatWest have confirmed they cannot supply cca and returned payment. So since November have not made any payments and have put account in dispute telling them no more payments will be made. Am still receiving statements requesting minimum payment - this month has gone from agreed £4 to over £2000. Is there a template letter to respond or should I just ignore until they threaten further action? Correspondence going to my mother-in-law as her account and she is getting worried.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have received response to letter I sent offering full and final settlement - just to get rid of it - of £38.70 being statement amount less interest charges from 3 years statements supplied and less amount of excess of payments over purchases for same 3 years.

 

They responded refusing the offer as being insubstantial.

 

They do however confirm that the agreement is currently unenforceable due to them being unable to supply copy cca and being unable to comply with section 78(1).

They state that the agreement is not void and any obligations to make payments under the agreement remain.

They refute the refunding of interest charges as the full balance was not repaid each month and interest was charged correctly in accordance with published tariffs.

 

They also request to be be provided with:

a) Upto date financial statement

b) Copies of letters from other creditors who have written off or accepted settlements (of which there has been one who wrote off a 'goodwill' after going to FLA)

c) Copies of relevant current medical documents

d) Suitable offer of full and final settlement

 

Should I do any of the above ? Or ignore as they cannot currently enforce agreement?

 

Have been given 8 weeks to respond or they will assume satisfied and close complaint.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They responded refusing the offer as being insubstantial.

 

They do however confirm that the agreement is currently unenforceable due to them being unable to supply copy cca and being unable to comply with section 78(1).

 

Standard blurb, I would ignore. They have said that they can't enforce the agreement, so leave it at that. They are not entitled to any of the docs that they ask for, only a judge can ask for these.

 

Separate issue - Natwestlink3.gif have confirmed they cannot supply cca and returned payment. So since November have not made any payments and have put account in dispute telling them no more payments will be made. Am still receiving statements requesting minimum payment - this month has gone from agreed £4 to over £2000

You risk nothing all the time they cannot produce the agreement because that is precisely what they would need in order to go to court.

 

 

Is there a template letter to respond or should I just ignore until they threaten further action? Correspondence going to my mother-in-law as her account and she is getting worried.

They can ask all they want but without an order from the court there is nothing they can do.

 

Have been given 8 weeks to respond or they will assume satisfied and close complaint.

 

 

Did you complain?? I don't think so!

 

They also request to be be provided with:

a) Upto date financial statement

b) Copies of letters from other creditors who have written off or accepted settlements (of which there has been one who wrote off a 'goodwill' after going to FLA)

c) Copies of relevant current medical documents

d) Suitable offer of full and final settlement

 

Should I do any of the above ? Or ignore as they cannot currently enforce agreement?

 

 

Do none of the above.

I have had personal dealings in the areas I comment on, however, I am not a lawyer. Any advice I give is without prejudice and is merely my opinion based on the information I have gleaned from my experiences, understanding and interpretation of the law. You should always seek the advice of a qualified legal professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - I have replied to them acknowledging their confirmation of agreement being unenforceable and informing them no further payments will be made. Have also reiterated the fact that I believe the interest charges are grossly excessive and compounded. Sent a current income and expenditure just for their info showing that there is still no disposable income should they manage to cobble together a cca and terms. Highly unlikely as I think the card was taken out in the 1980's if not earlier.

 

Thanks again for your advice. Just need confirmation that I am doing things by the book - so to say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...