Jump to content

fenlon962

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

2 Neutral

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thank you for your help Obviously I have just screwed it up so any suggestions would be appreciated
  2. Sorry - just realised what you meant by 1 multipage pdf NOT 1 pdf per page !!
  3. Hi I did post separately but the website merged them all to one post. Details of letter : To whomever it may concern Ref : Letter before County Court Claim Ref ************* - IN DISPUTE – DO NOT CONTINUE WITH FURTHER THREATENED ACTION Without prejudice : I do not acknowledge any liability or debt to you or that any contract existed or that you have the right to enforce contracts in relation to land that you do not own. In fact I find these claims quite ludicrous and believe the restrictions outside operating hours a total nonsense. Depending on your answers, I may be willing to consider your demand but I require a breakdown of the figure you are demanding and an explanation as to how the sum claimed represents your administrative costs. Please explain how you arrive at your calculation. I also consider that your parking charge is an extortionate penalty and does not reflect any administrative losses that might have been suffered by you or by the owners of the car park or by the food outlet itself. Due to the fact the times stated are outside of any business operating hours and causing no detriment to either the registered business at the address or indeed the owners of the car park. The alleged overstay period is also actually less than is chargeable at most official and registered National Car Park or Council owned. Please forward written evidence of your authority to impose restrictions on parking at this location, specifically in relation to differing time restrictions to original planning permissions and other retailers on the same retail park. I completely dispute this alleged parking breach and any further action from yourselves will be resisted vigorously and considered harassment. Should you go down this route and waste court time I will be sure to request an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14 (2)(g)
  4. Hi. Update to previous. Now received attached letter refuting my dispute. PE reply to snotty letter.pdf
  5. OK. Amended and sending with proof of posting. Update when/ if anything comes of it. Thanks for your help.
  6. Apologies if I am missing the point here but lots of the snotty letters are sarcastic and ridiculing in body of text. Is that right ?
  7. Would this suffice : Ref : Letter before County Court Claim Ref ********** - IN DISPUTE – DO NOT CONTINUE WITH FURTHER THREATENED ACTION Without prejudice : I do not acknowledge any liability or debt to you or that any contract existed or that you have the right to enforce contracts in relation to land that you do not own. Depending on your answers, I may be willing to consider your demand but I require a breakdown of the figure you are demanding and an explanation as to how the sum claimed represents your administrative costs. Please explain how you arrive at your calculation. I also consider that your parking charge is an extortionate penalty and does not reflect any administrative losses that might have been suffered by you or by the owners of the car park. Due to the fact the times stated are outside of any business operating hours and causing no detriment to either the registered business at the address or indeed the owners of the car park. The alleged overstay is also actually less than chargeable at any official and registered National Car Park or Council owned. Please forward written evidence of your authority to impose restrictions on parking at this location, specifically in relation to differing time restrictions to original planning permissions and other retailers on the same retail park. I completely dispute this course of action and any further action from yourselves will be resisted vigorously.
  8. For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident) Please answer the following questions. 1 Date of the infringement 17/02/21 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 20/02/21 [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please do not put JPG Picture files into your post 3 Date received 25/02/21 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] YES 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? CAMERA SHOTS OF ARRIVAL AND LEAVING 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] NO Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here 7 Who is the parking company? PARKING EYE 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] KFC WALKDEN MANCHESTER For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here PCN / PCN REMINDER / CHASER LETTER / LETTER BEFORE CC - NEVER RESPONDED TO ANY TIME ENTER 08:35 AM TIME LEAVE 09:03 AM ZERO PARKING ALLOWED OUTSIDE KFC OPENING TIMES - CHANGED FROM PREVIOUS 3HR LIMIT Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up bothsides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY please do not put JPG Picture files into your post
  9. Hi I have received letter before county court from Parking Eye PCN. I have not responded at all and looking for advice now please? Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...