Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
    • Not sure what to make of that or what it means for me, I was just about to head to my kip and it's a bit too late for legalise. When is the "expenditure occured"?  When they start spending money to write to me?  Or is this a bad thing (as "harsh" would imply)? When all is said and done, I do not have two beans to rub together, we rent our home and EVERYTHING of value has been purchased by and is in my wife's name and we are not financially linked in any way.  So at least if I can't escape my fate I can at least know that they will get sweet FA from me anyway   edit:  ah.. Sophia Harrison: Time bar decision tough on claimants WWW.SCOTTISHLEGAL.COM Time bar is a very complex area of law in Scotland relating to the period in which a claim for breach of duty can be pursued. The Scottish government...   This explains it like I am 5.  So, a good thing then because creditors clearly know they have suffered a loss the minute I stop paying them, this is why it is "harsh" (for them, not me)? Am I understanding this correctly?  
    • urm......exactly what you filed .....read it carefully... it puts them to strict proof to prove the debt is enforceable, so thus 'holds' their claim till they coughup or not and discontinue. you need to get readingthose threads i posted so you understand. then you'll know whats maybe next how to react or not and whats after that. 5-10 threads a day INHO. dont ever do anything without checking here 1st.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds Bank Debt


Chelle893
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4933 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I've been a member of this site for a while and have read quite a few interesting discussions with regards to Lloyds Bank but have not posted before.

 

I feel like I am at my wits end with Lloyds at the moment!!

 

My father had a credit card with them about 4 years ago which had about £3000 of debt on there when unfortunately 2 years ago he was told that due to increasing blindness he could no longer work as his insurance (self employed mecahnical engineer) would not cover him.

 

He contacted Lloyds bank, told them of the situation and it was agreed that he would make instalments of £20.00 a month and they would freeze the interest.

 

About a year ago they contacted him and increased the instalments to £30.00 a month which he has been struggling to pay but has always paid on time.

 

Recently he has started to receive default notices, I've rang the telephone number on these letters to be told just to ignore them as it is standard procedure,

I requested for this to be confirmed in writing but they refused.

 

I then wrote to the collections centre requesting his CCA (letter used from this site thank you) and requesting confirmation that all phone calls will cease

and that he is making payments as agreed. I also requested confirmation that the default notices will cease.

All we have received in return is the box standard reply to CCA and a copy of the T&C's (not his original one).

 

Now to top it off he has just received a letter from the SCM Solicitors requesting immediate payment of the full debt (who happen to be located at the collections department for Lloyds Bank).

 

As you can understand I am getting very frustrated as well as my father who I have to read these letters to, he's started to get very stressed

and is even considering getting a high interest loan just to get them off his back at which I have had to try and put my foot down

and say no as I know he will end up in a worse situation. I

 

t has now got to the stage where he has gone on to anti depressants as he just can't take it anymore.

Any help you can give me would be much appreciated.

 

Many thanks

Chelle

Edited by dx100uk
clarity
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42man,

 

I've had a look at the letter but not sure if I can send it as Lloyds will not enter in to any further correspondence with regards to the CCA and the debt itself is not is dispute. We have agreed with the collections department to make monthly instalments until the debt is cleared and yet we are receiving DN's and now a solicitors letter. I have the collections department telling me one thing by phone and another thing by letter. No payments have been missed since this agreement was reached and I'm at my wits end even trying to get them to admit in writing that payments are being made or that there is an agreement in place. The O/S balance is decreasing and the interest has been frozen plus I have proof that payments have been made but obviously I don't want this getting to the stage where my dad ends up in court.

 

I have attached copies of the most recent correspondence (personal details removed) for you to have a look at if it helps.

 

Many thanks

Lloyds to 16.11.10.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

 

you need to step back from this and look at it properly.

 

the letters from the debt debt/solicitors are , for want of a better word - fake.

 

please ignore them,

 

this is a std practice on longterm lowly paid debts, they try and squeeze you.

 

you keep saying DN's, i assume you mean a defauilt sum notice

not a default notice, they can only send ONE of those.

 

now, these DSN's are hitting your balance.

 

all of the unlawful charges like over limit/late payment etc etc can be reclaimed

 

as can mis-sold PPI.

 

pers i'd ignore the threat-o-grams

 

there is no way anyone will go near court with this

 

the judge would laugh them out the door and probably assign a LOWER repayment.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx,

 

It actually states Default Notice on the letters not Default Sum Notice, from the paperwork I have here he received one on 27th September and one on 26th October. They haven't applied any further costs that I am aware of as the balance has been decreasing by the £30.00 paid each month.

 

We'll ignore the letters for now and fingers crossed they don't try and push their luck by passing it to the courts.

 

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well thats not correct

they can only send ONE dn unless you break / change the agreement to pay.

 

you might want to pull them up on this

 

it will give a clear indication that you are addressing the debts in the best light possible and show it is being managed.

 

shame you've got no unlawful charges or PPI or reclaim...

sure there was none levied before the reduced payments stated?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx,

 

The agreement hasn't been changed or broken by him unless they have done something at their end which would put them at fault. He has been paying loyally for 2 years and is still paying on time every month.

 

I don't think he had PPI as I advised him not to get it, I knew what a waste of money it was. As for any charges I will have to go through the rest of his statements to check as I only have the recent ones.

 

In the meantime should I write a letter to the solicitors advising them that payments are being made monthly to clear the debt as agreed and requesting information as to why 2 DN's have been received when he has not broken or changed the agreement?

 

Many thanks

 

Chelle

Link to post
Share on other sites

who has sent these dn's?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds sent both of the DN's.

 

Have spoken to my dad briefly and it looks like he did pay for PPI which was cancelled when he was unable to keep up with the minimum monthly payments and agreed to pay £20 per month. He's not sure of the charges but believes there were some, we have to dig out his statements to be sure though.

 

Chelle

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well theres a GOOD source of income

if the PPI was charged monthly

then you can get that back & int & THEIR RATE

on EACH MONTHS payment for EVERY PPI payment he made

from the date it was made to today date

 

if LLoyds have sent you TWO DN's then something is funny here

let us see them please

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

 

dx

 

i bet that will clear the debt esp as its 2003

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri didnt see those

 

can you confirm what you paid between the dates of the two dn's?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then you didn't satisfy the first dn

so they have no right to issue a second.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd move to reclaim those PPI payments now.

 

do you have all the statements?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My dad is in the process of pulling up everything that he has on it at the moment so I can go through them. If he can't find them all I can request copies from Lloyds can't I?

 

Should I in the meantime send a letter to the solicitors stating that payments are being made and that an agreement was reached with Lloyds 2 years ago and we have not broken that agreement?

 

Thanks

Chelle

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i'd not bother with them at all

 

if you have not got the statements

 

you can SAR lloyds for £10

then they must sent everything they hold in their data systems on your dad.

 

see how you do.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx,

 

I've attached a copy of the letter I'm planning to send, can you please let me know if there is anything else I need to mention.

 

Dad has also received another statement this morning from Lloyds showing his payment and no other charges or interest have been added.

 

Many thanks

Lloyds letter 25.11.10.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd just send the std sar fom the library tab top left

 

dx

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...