Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
    • Thanks. We'll try to help over the weekend. If the hearing is on 05/07 then it's 90% sure that the deadline for filing your WS is 21/06.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tfl prosecuting me hellllppp plzzz


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4951 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

let me get straight to the point, i am GUILTY, i bought a child travel card for 2£ and used it to get to uni cuz i had literally no money left dat week and my grant was coming in soon

anyway, dats irrelevant, the ticket inspector stoppd me (london underground) and took my details down and said a letter will be sent to me, i askd him can i just be fined please (becuase i have been fined twice before for not having any ticket on me) but he said i will send a letter to you, i got that dreaded letter yesterday and now am worrying like crazy about whats going to happen next so if any1 can plz answer som of the following questions

 

1.wil i get a criminal conviction defintly

2.i want to plead guilty and just accept the fine, how much is it, do i need a lawyer

3.what does the letter look like wuith the court summons, i mean the envelop cuz i really dont want my parents knowing , if they see a big lookign official letter they will open it?

 

plz any help wil be soo appreciated thanks in advice guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this stage of process, a lot of things are not certain. Tfl may or may not prosecute. It is their choice. At this stage, you do not need a solicitor. I do recommend that you talk to your parents, part of their 'job' is guiding you through to being an independant person, and whilst I am sure they will not be 'happy', they may well have some pearls of wisdom that they can share with you.

At this stage of the matter, no 'fine' has been set, but it might be sensible to start putting money aside, it could well end up costing you somewhere around £300.00.

Afraid that you will have to wait for Tfl to write to you, and then respond to their letter. Old Codja has drafted some replies in other threads. Take a look at them, and modify one to suit your needs.

And please, when you write to Tfl, use proper English. 'Text' language might simply irritate some people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the comment about use of proper English language is very important in my view. I recognise that it is a part of modern communications and language is always evolving, but 'text speak' does irritate some people when used out of place.

 

You don't say how old you are in your OP, but I am assuming that you are over 18 years of age.

 

Try something like this:

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Your Reference >

 

I write regarding the letter that I have received from you and concerning the occasion on > when I was reported for travelling on your train service from > to > without a valid rail ticket.

 

I wish to offer my unreserved apology for my actions in the hope that you will allow this matter to be resolved without court action and thereby allowing me to preserve my good name. I have not previously been prosecuted for any offence.

 

I do recognise that I have been foolish in that I purchased a child rate ticket and I know this was wrong, but I had a need to get to university on time as it is important not to miss any of my education and I did not have enough money to pay the full fare due. In my worried state of mind I thought it was better to pay what I could rather than travel without paying anything.

 

I am extremely sorry for having failed to recognise that I was wrong to pay a child fare on this occasion.

 

I understand that fare evasion is a serious problem and unfair to the vast majority of travellers who pay the correct fare every time, I hope that you will recognise that I acted with the impulsiveness of youth and not with the intention not to pay, but out of genuine need to travel and lack of funds.

 

I wish to apologise to the member of staff concerned and to the Rail Company for the extra administration work that my actions have caused.

 

I am offering to pay the full fare that is due and the reasonable costs that have been incurred by the rail company in the hope that you will allow me to make amends for this uncharacteristic act rather than go to Court action.

 

I promise never to travel on a train without a valid rail ticket in future.

 

Yours etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you very much i will definetly be using old cajas draft , and yes i wil be sure not to use text language, yes i am 21 years old by the way. I really think this whole prosecution system is a farce, criminal convictions are supposed to be for criminals who commit actual crimes, not for someone who buys a cheaper ticket or jumps on a bus, anyway i will write the letter to them and hope for the best and yes my friends have been advising me to tell my parents as wel, so guess i have to bite the bullet and tell them ,

thanks guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've tried to help you with that suggested letter, but I suggest that you amend your thinking a bit too

 

Someone who buys a child ticket at the age of 21 with the intention of travelling on a train without paying the correct fare due commits a criminal act. That is the act of fare evasion.

 

If you haven't got enough money to pay for something, but take it anyway, you are stealing.

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crime is committed by people who break criminal laws. Bunking a train fare is exactly the same as swapping labels on goods in a shop to buy an expensive shirt more cheaply. Sorry if you don't like that, but 'there it is'.

 

To get the best results for yourself from a position of being accused of a crime, you have to start to understand how a Magistrate will see the matter, and understand that a prosecutor already has a good idea of how the Magistrates will see things.

 

And for anyone who says 'nobody got hurt', here is a thought:

 

Railways get a subsidy from the tax payer. Every pound that is given to a railway could have been given to the NHS instead, to help people who are in pain and dying. If you avoid a rail fare, people do get hurt.

 

We are all aware that soldiers are getting hurt because their kit isn't the best that money can buy. Next time you gip a bit from 'the railway', perhaps think about others who give rather more than they get.

 

Old Codja and others will freely give advice, and don't mind a bit to whom, but the best advice anyone can give is 'don't do it in the first place'.

 

Thats off my chest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you very much i will definetly be using old cajas draft , and yes i wil be sure not to use text language, yes i am 21 years old by the way. I really think this whole prosecution system is a farce, criminal convictions are supposed to be for criminals who commit actual crimes, not for someone who buys a cheaper ticket or jumps on a bus, anyway i will write the letter to them and hope for the best and yes my friends have been advising me to tell my parents as wel, so guess i have to bite the bullet and tell them ,

thanks guys

You've already admitted that you knew you had done wrong, as you've been Penalty Fared before on two occasions, and you obviously knew you should be using an Adult Ticket at 21 years of age. Fare Evasion is an 'actual crime'. Next thing you'll be saying is that train comapnies should be out catching murderers and rapists ;(

 

Can't really add further to the sound advice already given here though, just that it would be in your interest to suggest paying any reasonable admin costs in order to stay out of court. TfL aren't obliged to accept, and may decide against settling with you given your history.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...