Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

due to take the car 30th


davebutton
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4958 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ive left it a bit late, been trying to get the money together, but received a letter on the 15/09/2010, Notice of Sums in Arrears, saying that opening balance £19,282.50 Shortfall for the purpose of this notice £542.66,, got made redundant in 08 fell behind in payments had a new agreement done and got back on my feet, again lost my job, have got new job but fell behind with payments again, asked the lady on the phone for my agreements, and she sent me these, have just put the sar request together, sending it off at the end off the month, have also read that I could claim ppi back, but that can be done later, both me and the other half work full time 4 kids in school, it would wreck our lives if they take this car, its been driving me crazy the last few days, and then came across this section, has cheered me up abit but not sure were to start, they said i have not paid enough for them not to get a court order to reprocess, but the car is on a drive, I think they need a court order for that, please help

 

5030245819_991bfde373.jpg

5030249437_167b573a7b.jpg

5030247375_2d87e8c536.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive left it a bit late, been trying to get the money together, but received a letter on the 15/09/2010, Notice of Sums in Arrears, saying that opening balance £19,282.50 Shortfall for the purpose of this notice £542.66,, got made redundant in 08 fell behind in payments had a new agreement done and got back on my feet, again lost my job, have got new job but fell behind with payments again, asked the lady on the phone for my agreements, and she sent me these, have just put the sar request together, sending it off at the end off the month, have also read that I could claim ppi back, but that can be done later, both me and the other half work full time 4 kids in school, it would wreck our lives if they take this car, its been driving me crazy the last few days, and then came across this section, has cheered me up abit but not sure were to start, they said i have not paid enough for them not to get a court order to reprocess, but the car is on a drive, I think they need a court order for that, please help

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]22144[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22145[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22146[/ATTACH]

 

Do you know how much you have paid?

 

Also you say you think you have PPI - have you tried to claim on this for your redundancey?

 

You say the car is on a drive - is it your drive and is it your private property?

 

When you purchased the car did you get the finance via a broker or did you arrange the finance direct with welcome?

 

Is this the original loan or has it been re-writen since you first had it?

 

sorry i know its a lot of questions but all helps.

 

IF the car is on your private property they can not take it with out a court order - your problem may be using it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

got the car at the welcome car showroom lakeside, the loan was re-written on 10/09/08, the files attached dont seem to come up, have used flikr to upload scans, the house is council property, not sure how much ive have paid, just tried to do some caculation, looks like i have paid 9k 380.20 x 24 and 4k 193.63 x 24

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did say to them I had paid alot, they said not enough, to get a court order

 

You say you paid 9K and 4K

 

Was the 9K on the first loan and the 4K on the re-write?

 

Also how much was the first loan for?

 

If you have paid over a third on the first loan then the goods are protected - whether you have it re-written or not.

 

sounds like they are claiming you have not paid one third on the new loan. This might be true - but if you paid one third on the first loan the car is protected and they can not touch it. But beware this does not mean they wont try and take it.

 

Also if the drive is not a public access - and forms part of your home it is private property and they can not remove it without a court order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

going to give them a call today, to see if they can give me a total what I have paid, and a bit of a long shot if i can pay the £542.66 on 15th as me and the partner both get paid, really need to keep this car as we will both have to give up our jobs if they take the car

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant ssem to get the big pictures up from scan, here is link to flicker page with 3 scan of the agreement the lady sent me, it wont let me post link to flickr as ive not had more then 20 posts, flickr account is davebutton if that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say you have received notice of sums in arrears but have you received an actual default notice?? They can't take the car if they haven't sent a default and termination notice. What makes you think they are coming on the 30th?

Don't listen to anything they say on the phone, they are a bunch of scheming, cheating liars!

 

From what you have stated so far I would think that they do not have any right to take your car UNLESS you give consent. DO NOT GIVE CONSENT!!!

 

In order for them to legally remove your car against your wishes they need to follow a specific process:

 

  • Service of a compliant default notice allowing 14 clear days for you to pay arrears
  • Service of a termination notice
  • If more than a third has been paid on EITHER the first OR second agreement they need a court order
  • If the car is not on a public highway they will need a court order in any case, irrespective of how much has been paid.

Keep the car on your drive wherever possible because, for some reason, I doubt very much if they will touch it unlawfully whilst it is on your premises :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers for reply, have had two letters one saying "without prejudice" and the other is a default notice served under section 87(1) dated 15 sep 2010, saying i have 14 days to pay 474.56,

 

total amount payable under agreement(less any installation charge) 23236.80

total amount that you have paid by date of the giving of this notice 3979.16

 

Payment to be made

arrears 474.56

outstanding balance under this agreement 19282.50

less rebate allowable in future installments (6468.00)

less insurence rebate 0000.00

total amount to be paid 12814.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

its says failure to read this letter may result in legal proceedings,you are hereby served under section 87(1) fo the cusumer credit act with attached default notice. we intend to exercise our rights to enforce collection unless you clear the arrears within 14 days, or alternatively contact us with your proposals for settlement. be advised that should you fail to contact us and legal action becomes necessary we may applythrough the courts for an attachment of earning order to made a deducted via your employers.

 

then its goes on to say you ave the right to end this agreement in short will have to pay 12814.50 to end this agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

just rang them to find out how much of the first agreement I have paid, they dont know, but can send a statement out, will be to late then the car would have gone, have asked if i can make a payment on the 15th, but he said once the notice is in force they cant back out, notice runs out 29th

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible for you to make a small partial payment before the 29th?? I only say this because if you make any payments following the service of a DN they will have to re-issue the DN because the first one will be invalid due to overstating sums due and thus giving you the time you need to pay the arrears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just rang them to find out how much of the first agreement I have paid, they dont know, but can send a statement out, will be to late then the car would have gone, have asked if i can make a payment on the 15th, but he said once the notice is in force they cant back out, notice runs out 29th

 

Looking at the agreement - if you have paid £9K before the re-write you have paid approx half. THEY CAN NOT take the car with out a court order.

 

Who has been calling you/ sending letters - is it local branch or head office?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the agreement - if you have paid £9K before the re-write you have paid approx half. THEY CAN NOT take the car with out a court order.

 

Who has been calling you/ sending letters - is it local branch or head office?

Wholeheartedly agree, in fact they have just had a massive ticking off from the Ombudsman for doing exactly that. The choices are yours and the course of action you choose now depends totally on the outcome you want from this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just wanna keep my car and my job, its driving me and the other half nuts, we having soo many aguments because of this, I cant stand this much more just wanna get on with my life,

Well in that case I would recommend you do what you can to make some kind of payment before the 29th, it doesn't have to be the full amount at all; any amount will invalidate the DN and give you the time you want to make up the arrears and continue on as before. It will also prevent a default being registered against your credit file.

 

I would just like to point out the other options though just in case you change your mind :madgrin:

 

As long as you have paid more than a third on the first agreement and it is for the same car as on the modifying agreement they are not lawfully entitled to repo your car without a court order. However, they believe they don't need a court order and it is possible that they will repo anyway, in that case you will be entitled to all your payments returned and possibly the value of the car too depending on how you want to play it.

 

There is of course a lot of difficulty involved in choosing this route, but it is entirely your decision and I wouldn't like to suggest you do anything that will cause upset and disharmony within your family.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unit 2 Stanton gate, mawney road romford essex rm7 7hl got statments from customer relationship centre nottingham

 

Ok this is a local branch.

 

What i would do now is contact and complain to your local trading standards office - then do the same with the OFT (Office of Fair Trading). Explain the situation and that you have paid half off the original agreement - and now they are going to repossess based only on payments made for re-write.

 

Once you have complained to both, (Get reference numbers or names if you can) - telephone welcome head office on 0115 984 9200 and ask for the complaints team. Get the name of the person you speak to. Tell them you wish to lodge urgent complaint and explain complaint - tell them you have complained to Trading Standards and the OFT. (If either of these give you any advice quote this too).

 

Make sure they understand that the car is protected and you will be taking legal action against them if they attempt to take the car. Also tell them that you will be reporting a matter of theft to the police should they take the car.

 

then come back here - you have loads of crap insurances etc. on your agreement and i would bet that there secret undeclared commission payments. so we may be able to help get rid of those and reduce your payments.

 

On this the law is on your side.

 

Here is link for consumer direct - give them a call.

 

http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact

Edited by dadofholly
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if it was a 48 month agreement you need to have paid at least 16 payments for a third to have been paid if there was no deposit or part ex.

 

 

Hi Wannabe

 

He sent me copy of agreement as he could not get it to post here. It has total payments due of just over £18K and says he has repaid approx £9K

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Davebutton

 

Notwithstanding other comments you have received and to be fair I haven't read them all - so apologies if I am simply repeating any of the information : 0

 

But....

 

I had a quick look at the information to be found on your default notice; they have stated the 'default sum' as the same amount as the 'arrears sum' - this seems totally untoward and cannot be correct.

 

A default sum should be the amount they have charged you for being in arrears - and they can only charge you a default sum or indeed send a default notice after such time as the 'default sums' amount to the prescribed amount as prescribed by the secretary of state (from what I have found out; it would have to be more than between £50 to £100 of charges long before they can serve a default notice).

 

Then take into account default sums can only be applied to your debt at timely intervals (I think this is about 1 every six months - Please check the CCA 2006 to be 100% sure of this titbit) - so where lenders send you a letter on a daily or weekly basis or make chargeable phone calls to you in order to arrive at the prescribed amount before time - this is unlawful too.

 

Effectively, the default notice may have been sent at the wrong time and potentially advises you of the status of your account with them incorrectly - where on earth are you expected to find £400 odd pounds in 14 days - what do they take you for? a bank!! - Sounds like they need to get thier facts and administrative practises right first!!!

 

Apple : )

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...