Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

help please ARC /EGG


toplad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5037 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i few weeks ago i recieved a letter from ARC

stating they were collecting an outstanding debt from Egg.

i disputed the debt and sent a cca request.

ARC replyed stating this is nothing to do with them and if i need the CAA then i need to contact Egg myself.

i have just ignore them and i have now recieved a letter from a soliciters informing me that they are taking me to court to get a ccj.

really worried how can they do this?

any ideas please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I sent them the "you haven't fulfilled my CCA request" letter. I've had two letters from Trevor Munn but clearly they are not from a solicitor, one is a proforma to fill out ! They're just using his letter head. It's been a month and nothing has happened. I'd love him to file a claim so he can take a trip to my home town and be told to give me some beer tokens by a judge lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HeftyHippo

Who is the solicitor? Trevor Munn? Does it say they are taking you to court or does it say that they are instructed that if you do not pay in 10 days they are to start proceedings?

 

Or does it say that they are preparing papers for Northampton County Court and the only way to stop it is to pay them or contact them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HeftyHippo

standard letters

 

IMHO, ARC cannot do anything unless Egg have sold them the debt. if they haven't said so, it is almost certain they haven't. ARC are simply being paid to chase you.

 

It is also my undersatnding, that as ARC don't own the debt, you dont owe them any money, and you haven't broken any agreement with them. they cannot therefore take you to court for something you dont owe, and cannot claim damages for a contract that doesn't exist.

 

Do what Harrased Senior says, follow the procedure for requesting info under Civil Procedure Rules. Send it to his home address (have a look for my posts in the last couple of weeks, I gave the address in one of them, or go to the Solcitors Regulation association) its Easterley Boathouse of something. it really upsets ARC when you write there.

 

He will ignore it, so in a few weeks, you can complain about him to the SRA! Fight back, and most DCAs are inclined to give up.

 

Munn will ignore it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

just got a reply from Trevor munn today-

 

ignore my previous demand for correct paperwork.

 

new letter states claim is now ready and gives a breakdown of what i owe, court costs and solicitors fees.

they state if i ignore this letter they will proceed ti issue the claim without further notice.

 

should i just ignore or what do you think??

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can write to them again and say in reference to your letter threatening court action, please refer to my CPR request sent on xxxx(date) and received on xxxx(recorded delivery date) to which I have not received a reply. I understand that in order to issue a claim through the County Courts you must be in possession of the documents to support this claim which I have requested that you supply.

 

Remind them that the debt is in dispute therefore they should not be threatening further action until this dispute is resolved.

 

Send a copy of the letters sent and received with a complaint to the SRA.

 

If they do issue a court claim you can simply defend it on the basis that they have not supplied the documents.

Edited by coledog

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...