Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you never use or give an email  2nd class stamp with free proof of posting from any po counter dx
    • Much appreciated for the ammendment. The snottier the better right!   What I am assuming is that this response is to be posted to Gladstones? However, I am seeing some users sending this as an email instead, which is a little confusing.  If we're happy with this response, what would you suggest is the best way to send it over to them (post/email), and is there anything additional I could include (if necessary)?  Thanks again! 
    • Hi I've read through other threads to better inform me of the process from here onwards. When I put in the MoneyClaim it gave me a claim number and it currently says to wait for the defendant to respond, they have until 7 August.   It seems their most likely action is to extend that a further 14 days to about 21 August - this hasn't happened yet, of course, as it is only 27 July but I'm anticipating that may be the case. when the expected defence action is taken by EVRi I will need to submit DQ with these responses A1 - no mediation B - my contact details C1 - yes to the small claims track D1 - No.  If No please state why.  I believe the defence will provide some rebuttal to the particulars of claim and so I need to include details as to why the claim requires a hearing.  Is there some certain templated text I can include here or will it vary depending on what the defendant comes back with? I see on the form it mentions the following: Relevant reasons include that there are factual disputes which will need the judge to hear from witnesses directly or the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally.  Hoping to reach out to see what may be the most effective statements for D1 reasoning. E1-5 are pretty straightforward. I want to get ahead of things and be ready to take the next step so I appreciate what advice you may have about the DQ.   Thanks!  
    • Rachel Reeves is set to reveal a public finances shortfall of billions on pounds after a snap audit.View the full article
    • Hi What they have asked in what you have highlighted isn't unusual at all as Councils have numerous different departments that deal with specific different areas within that council. So if what you are asking in your DSAR is say specific to Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, Planning Permission etc then just let them know that specific area. On the other hand if you want every bit of DATA they hold on you then simply tell then ALL DATA they hold on you it's them up to then to go through all depts to check for it. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5070 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

 

I came on this forum a few months back with regard to my debt problems.

 

One of the debts was a Council Tax debt which has gone to court and Balliffs instructed. I sent them a letter to say that I would be unable to pay this as I was a carer for my parents,

 

They have now turned up and issued me with 'notice of intended seizure of your goods'.

 

I have not signed anything, they just gave it to me after I told them they was not invited in and had no goods to give them.

 

I'm a complete wreck right now and don't know what to do.

 

I need to go bankrupt as I have had my house repo'ed and have over £40k in unsecured debts and am on carers allowance.

 

If I have missed something out, please let me know as my head is completely not with it after that.

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so sorry that you find yourself in this predicament. Going Bankrupt is ALWAYS the last avenue open to you.

 

A few questions to help me and others offer advice:

 

Do you live in Scotland

 

How much do you owe in Council Tax, is this for the home that was reprod' and where do you live now, with your parents who you are a Carer for?

 

I believe your position may not be as scary as it feels, as there is quite a bit of help and assistance which may be available to you.

 

Lets deal with the bailiffs on this thread, and start other threads about your other debts and there will be much support available for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Harrassed for the reply.

 

I live in England.

 

The council tax is for £522. It is on the repo'ed property. It was empty over that period as well.

 

I live with my parents. I car for both but mainly my Mum who has Dementia.

 

I don't have a car. The only possessions I have are a PC, TV and some cast iron weights.

 

I am right in thinking that they can't enter my property? I told them I wouldn't let them in for that reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, not too up on Council Tax, but what dealings have you had with the Council prior the Bailiffs arriving. The rate should have been considerably lowered if the property was uninhabited, but then, if it was actually repo'd, wouldn't the mortagae company be liable for the tax?

 

Have you received a CCJ because of this tax, because in my mind I believe you should go back to the council and query this debt.

 

Do you have the bailiffs' contact details as you have to inform him that the house you now live in is owned/rented by your parents and all possession therein belong to them. Try and find some proof such as a rent book, or, indeed their Council Tax bill.

 

I must admit to flapping about a bit here as this is not an area I am knowledgeable about.

 

I really think your first port of call has to be the council, and also, find out if they Bailiff is Court appointed (ie after a warrant of executions after a CCJ was granted) or, if he is a private bailiff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening

Easier said than done I know but try not to worry as there are some very worldy wise Caggers around

This link should bring up a leaflet on Council Tax . . . .

http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/1198171

 

There is a list of exemptions and Repossesion is on the list but I didn't have time to read right through so I hope there's some good info in there that can be used

good luck

R

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I asked them to wait whilst I got my Bank card :violin:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Information that may help if a CCA request is refused due to the lack of a signature . . http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?248863-Signature-demands-fight-back-possible-!&highlight=

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off you did the right thing in not letting them in, secondly, if you live with your parents who you are caring for then your household is classed as vulnerable under the national standards of enforcement agents, and this debt needs to be passed back to the council for them to start making arrangements for this debt to be paid back at a reasonable repayment. If your home was empty during a certain time, did the council tax department know this?

 

My advice is to start paying what you can afford to the council using their online payment facility on their website, you need to know the account number of that debt which should be your council tax number for the year in question.

Write to the Manager of the benefits and revenue department, email as well explaining your situation and how much you can afford to pay off the debt each week/month. You need to show some sort of proof when your home was empty and the dates that it was unoccupied from. If you have this proof then your CT should be reduced.

Dont worry about the bailiff, ignore them and eventually your account with them will be passed back to the council, just dont let them in .. in fact you dont even have to acknowledge them, but you must show that you are willing to pay off this debt and the best way is to pay online on your councils website. Make sure you write to the council that this is what you are doing. As long as you dont let the bailiff in, there is nothing he can do. Make sure all windows and doors are locked.

You can also get in touch with your local councillor for help and advice, they will often intervene on your behalf.

If you have problems with writing letters then get back on here and we will help you write one out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...