Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • retailer said they'd speak to dpd on Tuesday. I don't want to screw the retailer because they were doing me a favour by fixing it for free  I hope dpd will refund them so they don't lose out. Will keep you guys posted. 
    • Well, we live on the same road so it should be the same postcode. When I spoke to dpd and asked why were my neighbours' address not on the list and she said maybe they're not of the same postcode and I checked and they definitely were. Not to mention, delivery instructions are supposed to override actual customer's address which is why they asked for instructions I thought.
    • again a quick google search states Appeal a DVLA fine - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) i would not be appealing mind. it's only a summary charge which they rarely do court on and pass out the powerless DCA's whom are not bailiffs they have 6mts. see where they go. as you've sorn'd it will probably be nulled. dx  
    • There are a number of reasons why you may not have been issued a notice in the post within 14 days. If you were stopped by the police it may have been given verbally. In the case of speeding offences, the police may issue you with a conditional offer of a fixed penalty of 3 points and £100.00 fine by post or an offer of a speed awareness course. If the offence is considered too serious for a speed awareness course or fixed penalty you may be charged with an offence which normally occurs by way of the issue of a Single Justice Procedure Notice. If the vehicle within which the alleged offence took place was registered to another person or company there is technically no need for a notice to be issued to the driver. After the police have obtained details of the nominated the driver, they will normally send the notice to them, although there are no time limits within which they must do so (provided that the notice was received within 14 days by the registered keeper of the vehicle). In such circumstances, a person may receive a notice several months after the alleged offence too place but still be prosecuted. A Guide to a Notice of Intended Prosecution | Motoring Offence Lawyers the above copy n paste link has purely been copy n pasted here to inform you of the regs, which you could have done yourself by, as this is, a google search......... we do not ever recommend using such offered webservices! dont dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

iTunes Driving me Nuts!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5016 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I want to sue the pants off Apple for wasting so much of my time and making it so hard to use my music on non Apple hardware! Ha - wishful thinking I know but here's the problem:

I have almost 5000 music titles on my computer around two thirds of which come from a cumbersome CD collection and rest from the iTunes store. I have 5 iPods of various types around the house so all was well until I bought an HTC phone. To play my music on that I had to export the tracks from iTunes which a) takes an enormous amount of time and effort and b) creates all sorts of cataloguing issues that I won't go into here except to say it makes the library difficult to use. It has taken many weekends of effort and I still haven't got things right.; missing album art, incorrectly labelled tracks and so on.

The crux of it is that Apple say they are protecting the rights of copyright holders by encrypting tracks and saving them in a proprietary file format but what they are really doing is locking people in to using their hardware and that can’t be right. It’s unlawful in some countries and they have been sued for it in the USA before now.

Is anyone taking action against Apple in the UK for this restrictive practice? I will add my name to the list if they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not too up to date on HTC but my Mrs has a Blackberry. I too have an array of albums on my laptop and I also use iTunes for my sons iPod. As for the Blackberry I just bluetooth any songs she wants from my laptop straight to her phone.

 

Apple and iTunes have always been a pain in the a**e. Sorry I can't help you more. If your computer hasn't got Bluetooth capability, you can buy USB Bluetooth dongles for a couple of quid on the net. They are tiny and simply just plug in and automatically installs giving your PC/Laptop Bluetooth capabilities.

 

Another possibility would be to send the music as an email attachment to yourself, and open the email using the HTC and then open the attachment and save. I've never tried it, but I'm sure it's possible.

  • Haha 1

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love my HTC and I dislike most things apple. The HTC Legend that I have has a peculiar file structure for MP3's (I don't know if yours is the same) where the songs have to go into a folder, and that becomes a playlist? I just wonder if that is contributing to the frustration.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for your replies.

 

The HTC Desire I have is quite happy to play most things so I am cool with that. It's the difficulty that iTunes creates when you need to export music for other hardware to play. Essentially this comes down to having to burn CDs although a virtual CD player makes that task a little easier. Even so, you end up with tracks that have odd titles, missing tags and other strangeness.

 

The main frustration is that they haven't licensed their decryption and m4p file format to any third party which means you have to jump through unreasonably tight hoops to get your music away from iPods, Itunes and so on. Some people have compared it to buying bread from Tescos only to be told it can only be toasted in a device from Tesco - you get the idea.

 

I am a part time musician and fully support any efforts retaillers make to ensure artists get paid for their work. But I don't like the way Apple have used it to lock our music to their hardware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are programmes out there that will decrypt itunes and remove protection. I looked into it for my sister inlaw a few years ago.

 

This website has a list: Removing DRM FAQ: How to remove copy-protection from iTunes AAC files (Windows software)

 

Try googling ipod protection removal for others.

 

There are also a number of programs that will change formats from Apple's formats to others.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have a HTC Desire and it's far better than the iPhone or iPod, cheaper to buy and 50% cheaper on monthly contract. I just laugh at people and what they "can't" do on an iphone. Anyway that's a bit off topic, as for itunes what they've got away with over the last 10 years is almost criminal and their excuses about protecting song writers and copyrights is simply lies. There are file formats that limit usage without having to be synced to their ridiculous itunes accounts. All they do is cash in on the Apple name as it has been the must have icon for the last 10 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back off topic:p, the best selling app for iPhone 4... phone box locater :lol:

 

I have the HTC Legend (smaller screen, slightly less powerful than the Desire, £20 per month!) Really is a lovely phone, 1 solid piece of brushed aluminum for the case, same shape as the HTC Hero.

 

I'm surprised Apple haven't tried to sue Google slating the "Android market" as a rip off of the "Apps store" :lol: (they are trying to take HTC to court and Nokia... I hope it goes aswell as when they tried to sue Microsoft as obviously they had patented windows :roll:)

 

Apple are the evil dictators or the computer world :p (Microsoft are like President Bush... (powerful but a little silly sometimes) and Linux are like Che Guevara(loved by his supporters, but unheard of by the majority :p)

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Apple have got a few counter sues (that the right word?) to contend with. They're all suing each other really and it's pathetic. The problem lies in the stupid US patenting system were it makes it almost impossible for anyone to do anything without stepping on each others toes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...