Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Creation/Irwin 1a small claim Summons old BOS then GE Money Joint Loan *WON*


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4512 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm not well up on Debt issues - others may be more up to speed, as there's not too much difference between Scotland and England, but irrespective of their response - that they are 'not required' to provide this information, your tack is that it would be in their best interests to do so as - if they cannot prove satisfactorily to you that they have an agreement with you, they most likely cannot do it in Court.

 

Another point, the Debt Collectors are only the monkeys in the game - you need to deal with the organ grinders - the original finance house. So ask THEM for a copy of hte agreement as you "have a genuine wish to sort this problem amicably, but you hands will be tied if they cannot comply with your request". (Meaning, you'll tell them to sod off and stand your ground). It'll take will-power, but you may find they've sold the debt on, and the DCA is just milking you until you dry up....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 332
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Why not tell them that it is their decision to disregard the information you have provided, and leaves them open to a formal complaint of harassment.

 

You should also add that as the original customer of their client, you have not had the benefit of receiving a a 'true' copy of the executed CCA regulated agreement, one that neither bears your signature, nor indeed any signature. Therefore, it does not meet the requirements laid down by the Act, and you recommend that they do more than blindly accept the erroneous assertion from Creation.

 

You advise that due to this non-compliance, the debt is still disputed, and should they continue to attempt to harass you, you will have no hesitation advising the Regulator of their unwillingness to adhere to industry guidelines.

 

Before they (WM) attempt to continue their involvement in this matter, you urge that they too may wish to seek that verifiable proof of such an agreement physically exists, as you have been singularly unsuccessful in obtaining this.

 

In the absence of such proof, WM should be advised that the account will remain in dispute until the relevant documents are provided, and to cease all communications with you until the relevant documentation is provided.

 

Send it by the Signed For Royal Mail service, keep a copy, and stable the posting receipt to it.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this:

 

Further to your letter dated 12th May 2009, A/c reference: XXXXXX

I am afraid I cannot accept your decision your decision to disregard the information I provided to you regarding the non-compliance of your client to provide a 'true copy' of the CCA agreement pertaining to the above account.

I must re-iterate that I have not had the benefit of receiving a “true signed copy” of the executed CCA regulated agreement, one that neither bears my signature nor indeed any signature. Therefore, it does not meet the requirements laid down by the Act, I would respectfully suggest that you do more than blindly accept the erroneous assertion from Creation Financial Services

Due to CFS's ongoing non-compliance, the debt remains disputed, and should you continue to attempt to harass me, I shall have no hesitation advising the Regulator of your unwillingness to adhere to industry guidelines.

I would suggest that before you attempt to continue your involvement in this matter, you may also wish to seek that verifiable proof of such an agreement physically exists, as I have been singularly unsuccessful in obtaining this.

In the absence of such proof, you should be advised that the account will remain in dispute until the relevant documents are provided. Additionally, I call upon you to cease pursuing me in this matter until the relevant documentation is provided. Failing this, it will leave me no option but to raise a formal complaint against your company with the relevant authorities.

Yours sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...