Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • You're right of course, just jarring when an actual man child is knocking on my door so close to the end. Anyway, I'll keep this thread updated if ever any exciting does actually happen. Thanks again.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC remove £900 from my account


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5102 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A stark warning if you go into dispute with a bank over a credit card close your accounts and move to a different bank.

 

2 years ago HSBC tried to fob me off with a blank CCA despite sending them the account in dispute letter in Oct 2008 and various other correspondence with their in house collection services Metropolitan and D G solicitors, I finally sent the final response letter to D & G in April 2009.

 

This morning I woke up to find that the money I had saved to take the kids away had vanished.

 

After spending all morning on the phone to various departments and visiting my local branch ended up at a complete impasse with metropolitan.

 

The impasse being:

 

Them: "The agreement you signed allows us to do this"

 

Me: "The agreement you cant prove I signed you mean"

 

after half an hour of this going round in circles I gave up .

 

More fool me for assuming that HSBC would comply with the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
A stark warning if you go into dispute with a bank over a credit card close your accounts and move to a different bank.

 

I am surprised you didn't do this before. I don't think you will get that money back BTW. I might be wrong but after reading of this with others before now the bank is within their rights to remove the money and do so they will eventually if they cannot recoup it any other way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Iceman.

 

I've changed your thread title.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, this is a fairly common situation, and is the reason I and others suggest opening a 'parachute' account for your day to day banking as soon as you have a dispute about any account with a bank/building society.

 

You could try the 'appropriation' approach, but it did not work for me. If it can be shown that they have taken your 'living' money to support yourself and family there may be a slim chance of forcing them to repay this money into your account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough Maroon we dont want the avaricious little turds making even more money by suing us do we.

 

A case of caveat emptor I am afraid

 

It was money I had saved from tax credits and disability benefits to take my 2 disabled kids away for a few days as very soon we will cease to be a family unit due to pending separation (dont want to sound like a sob story cos everyone on here has problems)

 

the only consolation is that due to a cock up with a disability benefit if they had only held their greedy little paws back for a few days they could have had another £600...... the back pay goes in on Monday....... and it goes into a joint account which they cant touch

 

 

so every cloud and all that

Link to post
Share on other sites

I look at it this way - if a company is incapable of keeping safe a piece of paper (which they are legally obliged to keep, IAW Money Laundering Regulations), why would you trust them with money?

Totally agree.

And, if they can't be bothered to read the letter I have sent them, then they can sing and dance as much as they like - they'll get ignored for sending me a copy of a letter they sent a few months ago.

 

I now bank with totally separate institutions that I have my debts (and so called ones:wink:) with. Iceman - it's simple to setup a basic/standard bank account with another bank as a 'parachute' account and it provides you with more flexibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This why I mentioned 'appropriation' in my earlier post.

 

DLA and any 'health/disability' benefits are not legally able to be included as 'disposible' income, so as such I feel you should have a fairly good case of mis-appropriation.

 

I will try and find more information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In theory when they saw the money was from tax credits and DLA they shouldn't have taken it. They can't claim they did not know as it appears on the statement who the money is from; can't remeber off hand what it says on tax credits but for DLA the DLA bit of the ref is a dead givaway.

 

Good luck with your fight. Personally as soon as i saw i was getting into trouble i contacted the DWP and had my DLA paid into a new account with a different bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...