Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fault with car after 3 months


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5019 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

As you seem to realise, you are protected by SOGA so you can forget about the 'warranty' for the time being. Having said that, it seems a good chance that the warranty was miss-sold anyway as it appears to exclude cars over a certain age and mileage.

 

Your first step would be to nicely explain to the nice man at the dealership that as far as you are concerned the fault was present at the point of sale and are they prepared to have the car back and put it right at no extra cost to you. If the nice man then becomes a bit arsey, inform him that in accordance with SOGA, you will be writing to him asking the same question as from then on all communication will be done in writing. Send him a letter (by recorded delivery) detailing the fault and what the AA garage have stated. State that under SOGA, you expect a repair at no cost to yourself and mention that the 'warranty' seems to have been miss-sold as it excludes you car because of itss age/mileage.

 

Conclude that in the event of him (the dealer) not responding within 7 days, you will assume that he is refusing to comply and as such you reserve the right to reject the car under SOGA where you will be requiring a full refund.

 

Do let us know how it goes after your telephone call.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I did not pay for the warranty. It was included so I cannot go down a route of mis-sold for that one. The £227 was the quoted price from the AA approved garage to replace the rear drivers side wheel bearing (Apparently its all included in the hub) and I wish it was a Bentley. Sadly just an Audi A4 Avant 1.9Tdi.

 

There is finance attached to the car with Close Motor Finance. I did put it in the first post but its hidden in a paragraph.

 

Your starting to loose it now. Whether you paid for the warranty or not is irrelevant. If it was offered as part of the deal and it excludes you car because of age/mileage then it was miss-sold.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you mean the entire deal was mis-sold rather than just the warranty? I took from the initial that it would only be the warranty rather than the car.

 

Thanks

 

If the car was advertised as having a warranty then most likely it was. Check with trading standards to be sure.

 

In any event, I would first do as I suggest in my post #3. I would also make the finance company aware of the situation... including the warranty issue. I'm sure they will be interested.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'd have a problem proving mis selling as the car came with a warranty and the OP didn't pay for it.

 

The OP states that the warranty co would not cover a car of this age and mileage so the warranty is completely useless. If the car was advertised as 'covered by a ex amount of months warranty', I would of thought that it was mis-advertised and consiquently mis-sold. You will note I suggest that the OP checks with trading standards.

 

What we need to remember is that the warranty is in addition to your statutory rights which is what applies here. If warranties are to work properley then they should become valid after 6 months which might then make them a bit more palatible!

 

Agreed.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Looking for a little advice. I bought a car on 1st April from a 2nd hand dealer in Peterborough.

 

At the time of purchase there was a small amount of noise during general driving which changed with speed which I took to be normal road noise caused by the budget tyres. Nothing sinister expected at the time but mentioned to dealer and he agreed it was probably just road noise.

 

Since then the noise has got worse. I contacted the dealership on monday to ask advise as I now suspected that the fault was a wheel bearing. They told me to take to their local garage who are approved by AA for the supplied 3 month AA warranty.

 

They have now confirmed a wheel bearing requires replacing at a cost of £227. The AA warranty firm was contacted but refused to pay out due to age of vehicle (6.5 years) and mileage (93k). I did not pay for repair and had it all put back together.

 

Contacted dealership today and asked for them to sort it out. Advised that manager of dealership on holiday until Tuesday (I knew this before he knew why I was calling so it is true) and my details were taken for a callback. The guy on the phone told me that any fault should be dealt with by the warranty and that if they wont cover it they have no responsibility.

 

I told him that this was not the case and that under the SOGA they are responsible for the car and I would like them to repair. He would not commit to anything until I speak with the manager.

 

Whilst the car was being inspected, I have been advised that there may be some noise and play from a front bearing in addition to the rear but difficult to tell as it is not very noticeable.

 

 

Can you please advise on my options and terminology I need to use? I do not want to pay for this as it is my opinion and that of the garage that this fault would have been present at time of sale and should have been picked up in inspections.

 

At this time I do not want to reject the car as it is suitable for my needs and if repaired is ideal for my family but if there is no satisfactory repair offered then I would consider it. Car is on a finance package with Close Motor Finance if it makes a difference.

 

No complaint has been made in writing yet and only contact has been over the phone. Dealership is across the road from the garage that inspected but they were closed yesterday when I was there due to football.

 

Many thanks

 

OPs original post with relevant bit about warranty exclusion high-lighted.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do people assume that a warranty is free. It is built into the price of the purchase therefore you are paying for the warranty regardless which makes it mis-sold as the warranty was an enticement to buy..

 

Exactly my point. If the car is subject to finance it's probably a condition that one is provided. Although in this case, I bet the finance co are unaware (as was the OP no doubt) that the warranty 'provided' by the dealer excludes the OPs car because of its age/mileage.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are missing the point Sam. Unless it was a material fact that it was an enticement to buy then it has no relevance as this sort of issue (i.e. wheel bearing failure) would be covered under SOGA ( accuratly for once) with the dealer.

You don't know the full terms and conditions of the actual warranty.

 

I think it's best to let the OP pursuit this at this moment by taking it up with the garage directly when the manager returns. It's not a case that the car is going to fall apart or is dangerous at this moment in time.

 

Not really, from what the OP has said it would appear that the warranty excludes this fault due to it's age and mileage. That would suggest to me that the warranty probably excludes many other (if not all) other components with the car. However, I am fully with you on this being a dealer responsibility because (as you correctly point out), the fault has occured within 6 months of ownership and in was most likely evident at the point of sale. But, my guess is the car was advertised as having a warranty so whether the OP paid for it or not would be irrelevant. In my experience, when a used car is sold through finance, the compnay providing the funds normally insist on a warranty being provided. In these circumstances, I think the OP ought to inform the finance co of what is going on in case they have paid for a warranty which is useless.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now spoken with the Manager who has said that the fault must have happened since point of sale. He was fairly friendly and helpful and said he would speak to the MOT station who tested the car the day before collection to check any advisories. Told me if there was an advisory then they would repair it. If not then it was my problem.

 

I have advised him that under SOGA he has a legal obligation to repair the car at his own cost.

 

I have hand delivered a letter yesterday stipulating that under SOGA I find the car of unsatisfactory quality and that as the car was bought less than 6 months ago the liability for the fault lies with the dealer.

 

Letter Sent :

 

 

Speaking with the manager this morning he has confirmed receipt of the letter and informs me he has passed it to his boss who will respond next week. He advises that if his boss wishes to repair as "an act of good faith" then they will but he disputes they have a legal obligation to do so.

 

I have also spoken directly with the MOT station who advised that if the bearing was faulty at point of sale they may not have noticed it as a worn bearing will only have play when it is in a serious condition. They will consider putting this in writing for me if required but I have not got it yet. They also advised that they do not test drive the cars on MOT's.

 

Dealer has said I should have noticed it during my test drive and as I have now done nearly 5000 miles since purchase that I have caused the fault myself (Comment over phone not in writing.)

 

 

Can anyone advise of my next step? I am fully prepared to go to court to resolve if necessary. I am considering rejecting the car as a mis-sold contract due to the warranty being effectively useless.

 

Yeah, right! He DOES have a legal obligation to do so and he knows it!

 

Let him have his 7 days from the date of your letter and if they do not respond it will be Letter before action time.

 

You will find that the warranty is 'supplied' because it is required by the finance co. Have you spoken to them about it excluding your car?

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew the finance co would help. I think you will find a different approach now from the dealer.

 

Keep us posted.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flub - the warranty in this case apparently excludes the OPs car because of it's age/mileage so not much use in any event. This suggested that the warranty had been supplied in the hope it would never be needed to be called upon. I am aware that some finance co's do not insist that a used car requires a warranty, but in my experience, most do and actually provide the funding for it which leads the customer believe its free. As the OP has stated, the finance company appear to be concerned about the dealer's stand so far.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your letter should make clear that you are formally rejecting the car and as such you require a full refund of monies paid. Indicate the current milegae reading and state that you are no longer using the car and arrangements should be made for recovery.

 

So I would delete (line 3) 'I have now been left with no alternative.... (to) ....through the courts' and insert your intention of rejection. The rest of it is fine unless anyone else wishes to comment.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Did you do what I suggsted in post #32?

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not put rejection into the letter at that point as I was still hoping for him to repair the vehicle. As per post #33 I handed the letter over with no specifics regarding action other than I would seek resolution through the courts.

 

He obviously now has no intention to repair the vehicle. As such I would now like to reject it.

 

Have you continued to use the car or is it with the seller?

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't be surprised if your rejection is turned down. You only have a short time in which to reject and you are now passed the 4 month point and can be deemed to have accepted it.

 

Which is probably why the dealer is ignoring the OP. The proceedure (as we advised) should be; Fault develops within 6 months of ownership= contact dealer asking him to rectify. Dealer refuses= write a formal letter asking him to rectify within a reasonable time or you reserve the right to formally reject under the SOGA and ask for your money back. Dealer still refuses/ignores after dead line= write formal rejection letter/final letter before action giving 14 days for collection/return of car and refund of monies Do not continue to use car. Dealer refuses/ignores= issue county court proceedings. The above time scale should be no more than 3 weeks (21 days) from the date when first reported the fault to making a claim to the courts.

 

The letter of rejection should of been sent by 9th July in this case and the car should of been parked up then or returned to the dealer on the same date. I believe I did advise the OP in my post of that day. The letter the OP sent on July 8th may of sufficed but again once sent, he should'nt have continued to use the car. The only thing he can hope is that the dealer is unaware that the OP used it since the 8th July.

 

I think the only option now is issue court proceedings for a refund or get the car repaired and issue a claim for the cost of the repairs.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Glad to hear of this outcome. You may wish to click the scales of those who assisted you!

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

  • Haha 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...