Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
    • You'll be fine don't worry.  
    • Thank you I cannot sleep. CRS is the company 
    • They wont take you to court. I'm not sure what they'll do about the letters and if they will or wont send you the letters from their retail prevention company, but you can ignore those letters. You'll be just fine don't worry.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Santander and right of Apprpriation


Caevans
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5053 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am posting on behalf of my sons girlfriend. She has no idea what to do and I said I would try and help her.

 

She is 18 and has held an Abbey National account since she was 15. She has gone overdrawn by approximately one or two pounds since she has had the account, never been a problem as when her money goes in they take the one or two pounds back and thats it. The bank itself was taken over by Santanderlink3.gif, and since then she has had nothing but problems.

 

She turned 18 early this year, and is claiming Benefits which are paid into her Santander account. At christmas she requested a cash only card (presently she has a visa electron) of which the bank apparently have no trace. Because she has a visa electron debit card she tends to use that to pay for things rather than drawing the money out of the bank. So again she ends up going overdrawn (the largest amount she has gone overdrawn is £4.51). The problem she now has is the charges made against her account, the bank chargeslink3.gif her £5 everytime she uses her card that takes her overdrawn. As she gets paid weekly this can be as many as 4 or 5 £5 charges in a month. They also are charging her £25 which adds up to £50 a month for being overdrawn by £4.

 

On the 24 may she was in credit (according to her statement) by £3.89 the same day the bank took £25 out of her account which put her overdrawn by £21.11. The following day she paid for something (amount £2.95) on her card not realising the bank had taken the charges and she was now overdrawn, they allowed the transaction to go through and charged her £5 for using the card whilst overdrawn (on statement as instant overdraftlink3.gif request fee). By the 28th may when her DWP benefit of £51.85 was paid in her bank had the overdraft up to £41.11 so she has £10.00 to live on.

 

I found out about all this at the beginning of June and immediately came to Cag to get advice, read all the threads and found the thread with the bank taking benefit money and right of appropriationlink3.gif letter. On the 4th of June I went to the bank with her asked what the charges were for, mentioned about not taking benefit money but didn't push that part too far as I wasn't sure but I did give them a right of appropriationlink3.gif letter including expenditure sheet. The bank informed me that rights of appropriationlink3.gif were only legal if the person was under the age of 18. I stuck to my guns and said that it was not and asked that they accepted the letter (which they didnt want to do). The person we spoke to went off and phoned two different departments which agreed that the letter was not legal over the age of 18. I asked again that they accept the letter and provide me with a signed receipt that it had been handed in (the assistant manager after some arguing did this).

 

What I would like to know is what to do now? What is my next step?

 

P.s The overdraft is unauthorised I'm not sure if this makes a difference, but I would have thought the card payment for £2.95 would have been refused if there is no overdraft facility instead of allowing it and then charging her £5.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son's girlfriend has just been to the bank, £50.00 Income Supprt was paid in this morning, this was all taken by the bank and she is now £6.50 in overdraft.

 

Can someone tell me what the next step is, I am prepared to fight this all the way to the courts if necessary, just need to know what the next step is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what a load of bull!

onlt under 18! my foot

 

there is a sticky entitled

is the bank taking your benefits

 

use the search in our blue bar.

 

i'll find it later if you don't

 

disgusting!!!! abbey shame on you...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just to explain - Caevans is my partner and she's asked me to comment about the current situation.

 

Right - last week they took £50 out of her account putting her just over £6 overdrawn - this week the income support came in - and they took it all again and put her back into overdraft. They've ignored the letter of appropriation (twice now). The poor girl has been left with no money at all - everything is being taken up with these bank charges.

 

We've got her to open up a parachute account - but the DWP is still paying her money into the Abbey account - where it's going to feed the bankers bonuses.

 

We really need to know what steps to take now - could someone point out the sticky that was mentioned above? I haven't been able to find it!

 

With no money for solicitors, we really need to know where to go. I've been advised that the banking ombudsman is about as much use as a chocolate ashtray, so we're thinking about going to CAB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...