Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi If you have went via a Mutual Exchange and this is to do with Social Housing/Housing Association then both parties need to firstly be approved by each parties Housing Association and accepted by them. Once this is done the relevant Housing Association for each will then get each party to sign a New Tenancy Agreement with the relevant Housing Association. So what we really need to know is: Does the other party to this Mutual Exchange know you have changed your mind on exchanging properties? Have they just signed an Agreement in principle to exchange properties? or Have they actually signed a New Tenancy Agreement for that Property? If they have signed a New Tenancy Agreement then this will make not now wanting to continue the mutual exchange difficult due to the New Tenancy Agreement being Signed. We really need to know what stage this is at to give correct advice
    • From unhackable communication networks to powerful computers, quantum technology promises huge advances.View the full article
    • going nowhere then. well if you've not been simply doing it to look the big cheese to your mates, you need to address why you are doing it. if its to impress your mates then simply stop being an idiot eh? , learn from it and go live your life . dx
    • Yes only with dwf. The first letter I received was explaining that I have not responded to the first letter they sent which I did not receive at all  then the second letter came, they said again saying we have not heard from you we are extending this another 14 days but at that point a couple of days before I called them on the phone saying I have received this and supposedly i owe money for stolen goods and that I need to see the breakdown which they then emailed to me dwf said this was what we were trying to send to you at first and I told them we have not received your first letter only one asking for demand of payment. On my second call to them I asked can you list the things that I have supposedly stole to which they replied “we normally have this on file but I can’t seem to find this on your file”   
    • oh well, at least your eign of terror is over now. so no contact directly since from/to sainsbury's. everything since has only been with DWF?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sharon V On:Line Finance **WON**


bearo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6289 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am still awaiting a copy of the original agreement and a copy of the Default letter, that supposedly sent.

 

The 30 day period has gone by and they still have not provided any information.

 

Will file at Court, when I get the cash.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will be waiting for a SAR request from these guys, they are very slow at providing the info...keep on at them, I rang and read the non compliance bit out to them over the phone and hey presto got my info....

 

Just an update, judgement for claimant issued on 31st Oct, lets hope they either pay up or forget as I really do not want a set aside now...christmas is coming and the goose is getting fat and all that :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

:mad: I've just had a letter through from some debt recovery agency now on behalf of on:line claiming the £301.

I'm going to send the LBA out to on:line tonight and write to tell recovery agency that the claim is in dispute. I think this is going to be a tricky one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I paid off our car finance a few weeks ago so the actual account is showing as 0.00 balance. However, there was a statement of charges from when the account was opened which amounts to about £600 of which £148.00 is still outstanding by us.

I sent a refund request letter off 2 weeks ago but as in #13 I got this:

 

The OFT regulations refer only to £12.00 limit on default cxharges incurred by creidt cards. The agreement you entered into with us was a conditional sale agreement regulated bt the consumer credit act 1974, which was inclusive of clauses whereby you agreed to indemnify us for any costs incurred. A tariff of these charges was included with your welcome pack at the beginning of your agreement. We must therefore aver that you have agreed to pay these charegs from the outset and thus do not accept your claim for re-imbursment"

 

Can you remember, or do you have a copy of the second letter that you sent. I wouldn't have thought that the one for bank templates was relevant.

Sorry for gatecrashing your post but I just know they'll be knocking for thei 'unenforceable' £148.00 pretty soon!

 

Thanks

Kerrie

Settled at 50%

Clydesdale £155. Should have been £310 charges, plus interest :( Husbands Account.

 

 

SETTLED IN FULL:

MBNA £1230. For Hubby.

Halifax £39.

RBS £342. For Hubby.

Cap One £200.

Abbey:

:D Settled in FULL April 18th 2007. £5179.83 Paid but what a long battle!

:D

COMPENSATION OF £100 ON 14/04/08 FOR CONTINUED HARASSEMENT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

Brilliant, I thought it was just a fob off but you never know and I always start doubting myself.

Re the bank template, I looked through it but because On:line had already said that referring to bank issues wasn't relevant I thought that some of the quotes etc might be out of place.

I did a search for GMAC anyway and found an excellent template from someone else who had successfully challenged them so I have amended that one to suit my own claim.

I have actually posted it on my own thread though entitled On:Line or is it GMAC

 

I only posted on this thread to see how others were getting on who were at similar stages to me.

Settled at 50%

Clydesdale £155. Should have been £310 charges, plus interest :( Husbands Account.

 

 

SETTLED IN FULL:

MBNA £1230. For Hubby.

Halifax £39.

RBS £342. For Hubby.

Cap One £200.

Abbey:

:D Settled in FULL April 18th 2007. £5179.83 Paid but what a long battle!

:D

COMPENSATION OF £100 ON 14/04/08 FOR CONTINUED HARASSEMENT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update, I rang Online finance this afternoon to ask them whether they would like me to save possible embarassment of baliffs, me and a camera crew coming to see them if I issued a warrant of execution to get my money back..I told them that perhaps it was better all round if they just paid up what they have been ordered to without further delay.

 

I was on hold for 5 mins and then was informed that a cheque will be raised this afternoon and signed by the manager, I should have it Wednesday at the latest, we shall see, hopefully though they will follow through with their promise and I haven't got to mess around with County Court Baliffs.

 

:) Happy days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, they have paid up as promised, didn't arrive until Friday, the cheque was also £3.76 short, when i queried this I was asked "You are going to complain about a couple of pence???" The lady on the other end of the telephone couldn't seem to understand they fact that this is my money, I did ask her how I wondered if I rang them last feb and explained my car payment was short by £3.00 this month would it be ok as it was only a couple of pence...she didn't reply! I guess that was my answer!

 

So, yup, I have won, fab, I am half debating for a bit of fun, pursuing them for the other £3 odd, the fact she made a remark like she did on the phone makes me want to.

 

:) Happy days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt mess about Ollie. The court order was for a particular amount and it is not satisfied until the full amount has been paid :D

 

I'd send them a letter saying unless the £3.76 was recieved within 7 days you were goiung to send the bailifs in just to see what they say:p

 

Oh and congratulations on the win.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed - perhaps before cashing the cheque you should write to them and state quite clearly that you'll accept it as partial settlement, giving 7 days for the remainder otherwise you'll instruct the court bailiffs without further delay (which will then cost them more, of course)

 

Congratulations by the way!

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do it, send the letter asking for the rest. The would move heven and hell to get that out of us, so why should we get ours back! Plus, it'll be comical to see if they bother to fight it!?

Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi guys,

 

sorry to hear that you've all had just as much problems with On:Line Finance ( now part of GMAC ) as I did when I had my hire purchase agreement with them.

 

I took out a £5600 HP Agreement with them in November 2000. I finished paying it off in August 2005. During my agreement they sent me numerous letters for arrears and charged me £12 per letter. Most months they sent me at least 3 of these so called arrears letters.

 

I filed against them on 29/01/07 and they had until 14/02/07 to reply. They failed to do this and on 15/02/07 the court entered a judgement by default. I asked for payment forthwith and so took out a warrant of execution against them.

 

Today I phoned them to let them know that the court baliff was going to arrive with a film crew from BBC X-ray programme and they have written and handed me a signed cheque for the full amout of fees taken, 8% s69 county court act interest, court costs and the £55 fee for the issuing of the warrant.

 

You can and WILL win against them guys, i'm living proof of that. This company will do anything they can to milk you of your money. They show no remorse and are happy to take money from you for sening out a piece of A4 paper costing no more than a £1. Court all the way with them and show NO mercy and give them NO room for negotiation.

 

Remember if they were seizing your car or taking you to court for non payment / default of agreement do you think they would be mercifull to you?????

 

If anyone needs any addresses or names ofthe people I dealt with please either post on thread or private message me.

 

I have two addresses for correspondence & service and a contact and telephone number of the senior litigations manager.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just checked on the wifes OnLine finance statement that they sent, and there are no charges on their at all. Would someone know what their charges were back in 2002/2003?

 

Thanks for your help and sorry for hijacking this thread, but it is an interesting one.

 

and congratulations on your win!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...