Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Voluntary Termination Question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4931 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just couple of questions please :)

 

My OH is VT ing a car.We have never done this before and the finance co. concerned did try to talk us out of it

We have paid exactly half of the amount borrowed and have arranged for it to be collected.

It is MOT'd and taxed and in our view in reasonable if not good condition for its age.

 

In the paperwork sent to us to arrange the collection it has suddenly been mentioned that the vehicle MUST have FULL service history and if any of the service history is missing a flat charge of £350 will be levied !

 

I have a copy of the agreement and cant see anywhere where this is mentioned.

 

The vehicle did not have its service history when we purchased it and although it has been serviced a few times we dont have all the copies of the invoices etc.

 

I am assuming this is another way to try to extract more money from us after VT ?

I am getting an independent inspection of the vehicle before it goes so that I can counter any claim that it was not in reasonable condition for its age.

 

Should I do anything else ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, did you have any insurance products included in the agreement??

I think an independent inspection is a really good idea. I've never heard of a car having to have full service history for a vt! If it's not in your agreement then you can't be bound by it, they sound like a bunch of robbing crooks to me :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi WannaB

I am paying for the independent inspection because I just know they will try it on.

There are no insurances like PPI or Gap on this agreement.

When they sent me the info about VT there was nothing about service history.

I completed all the forms and sent the required documents ...V5 and MOT and paid the last remaining amount outstanding.

Now they have sent the letter telling me who will be collecting the car and what I have to give them ..spare keys etc. and suddenly this service history comes up !!!

 

Do you think I should write to them now or wait until they have collected the vehicle and start on about the service history?

 

When the collection agents come they are going to check over the car whilst I am there so that I can AGREE ! any faults.

I really think they will be completely nit picking ..especially as I am sure they will lose money on the resale of the vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's good that there are no insurances, that means the half amount really is the half amount! :) If you check on your agreement the section about VT it should say something like "as long as the car is in reasonable condition", I doubt very much if it says "should have Full Service history"!! ;)

 

Have you got something in writing from them that says they are accepting your VT?? Sorry to be cynical but I've been dealing with Welcome finance for too long! Just make sure you cover yourself :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I approached them about VT they sent me a letter to say exactly how much was to be paid and what documents they wanted and I have paid it and sent the docs to them by special delivery.

 

I have tried to cover all bases and its just this service history that has thrown me ....

 

Yes it does say reasonable condition ... but no mention of service history

Link to post
Share on other sites

has there been any mention in the t&c on this service angle

 

this is a complete con by the finance company

 

you need to send them a letter asking for this and the date of the original vt request still stands

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Summer breeze,

 

I am about to VT my car - just because I have bought another one and the one I have no has such negative equity it's not worth part ex'ing it.

 

Have you been told anything about it affecting your credit rating?

 

I ask as I am getting conflicting info - my car dealer says nothing should happen to it

 

But then the finance company says it can have a negative effect?

 

As they are trying desperately to talk me out of VT'ing I wonder if its just a ploy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andie

The finance Co. told me that it would be noted on our credit rating that there had been a VT but this was not a negative marker.:rolleyes:

In our case it makes no difference anyway as our rating is shot beyond redemption at present

Funny .. we have lived without credit for almost 18 months and we are still here :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear... I have found a clause in the small print in the t and c s

 

'You must ensure the vehicle has a full service and repair history and supply this to us on request '

 

Guess I have a problem then ?

 

Only possibility that might help is that the proposal number on the T and C supplied is different to the proposal number on the agreement.

 

There is nothing on the page that has the signature that mentions servicing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Car collected this morning and the guy who took it said it was in 'terrific' condition for a 10 year old vehicle and that he had seen plenty of 3 year old cars in much worse state.

 

I got his name and badge number and phone number .

 

He noted some scratches to the alloy wheels and a crack in the rear light and that was all.

I told him there was no service history when we bought it and he didnt care.

He said it was going straight to the auctions .....

 

We will see what happens next then ..:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Just updating

 

I wrote and told them I did not agree with the charge and pointed out that it says in my agreement that following VT after 50% of the whole amount has been paid as long as the vehicle is in ' Average condition for its age there will be no further amount due '.

 

Their reply stated that in the agreement it states that I should keep the vehicle serviced and that they included a digital print out showing the service light was on therefore a service was overdue [ the print was not included with the letter]

 

I wrote back again saying no image included and in any case there is no clause in the agreement saying a penalty charge of £ 350 would be due following VT if a service was due and that the vehicle was in excellent condition and therefore had been well looked after [ I noted that they were not asking for any payment due to excess wear and tear]. I asked them not to contact me again.

 

A further letter has arrived pointing me to the parts of the agreement that say I have to keep the vehicle serviced and they enclose a further copy of the digital image [ again not enclosed !! ] . This letter then goes on about my complaint about notices of default sums !! which I have never mentioned at all so I think the writer forgot to knock that part out of the template letter they were using !

 

They now consider my complaint closed so pay up now !

 

I plan to reply stating that I also consider the matter closed and if they continue to write after I have now twice asked them to dessist I will be making an admin charge of £40 per letter to read and consider any further letter they may send .

 

I have also already threatened to report them to FOS and TS so I think I will point out that FOS will charge them £ 400 [ or is it £500 now ? ] to investigate.

 

Does anyone have anything further that I could add ? or any comments ?:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just seems they are trying to extort money from you to mitigate their losses. You are certainly being disadvantaged by their claim that it was in the terms and conditions of the agreement.

 

Did you get the inspection report in the end? and if so what did that say about any overdue servicing that they claim and yet to provide proof of.

 

I would certainly write to the fos about the matter but before doing so write back to the finance company stating you refute their claim to £350 of your hard earned cash, if they don't agree ask for a deadlock letter and then present your case to the fos.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just write to them stating very strongly that they have no legal basis for their claim of a debt due as the service history was incomplete when you purchased the vehicle and when they agreed to finance and so it is impossible for you to produce a full service history without falsifying the service documents which is fraud.

 

point out that if they persue you via a debt collector you will simply ask that they take you to court because you know they have no legal basis for their claim.

 

they can not include penalties for not maintaining service history retospectively. You are being charged a penalty because the last owner never maintained the service history, no court will uphold that.

 

I doubt very much a court would view you not servicing a vehicle which already did not have a full service history to have devalued the vehicle by £350 either.

 

while it can be argued (though many including myself disagree) that a full service history can slightly increase a vehicles value i doubt a court would rule not servicing a car with only partial service history would devalue that vehicle.

 

if they default you you will have options if you wish to pusue them and have it removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Cyril and Nicolee :) I have written a strong letter and advised them not to attempt to enforce this in any way and not to even consider registering any defaults as that will result in a claim against them.

I hope that will be the end of it but not holding my breath :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just a little Update on this thread in case anyone is interested.

I wrote to ' them ' on 3rd August and stated again that I did not owe anything and that there was no basis in law for their demand for £ 350.

I warned them not to pass on the ' alleged ' debt or to register any defaults and threatened again to make a complaint to the FOS.

I told them not to contact me again as further contact would be regarded as harrassment.

As of today I have had no further contact so hopefully Job done !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...