Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Off Topic Posts from Capstone Thread


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Do you have any ideas why a site that is not posting posts necessitates a link from this site, ,maybe action not words would have an idea what is going on. I feel the team has acted correctly on this issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

NAPIERNUTS

POSTS ARE BEING EDITED HERE IMMEDIATELY.

The simple reason your posts on the other site are awaiting moderation is that it is a blog with a very small number maintaining it, it is a non commercial site and free.

I CAN ASSURE YOU IT IS BEING RUN BY TRULY DEDICATED AND GENUINE PEOPLE ALL ARE WELCOME, THERE IS NO CENSORSHIP.

Your comments are no doubt in a queue there are some 300 hits a day there thats the reason they haven't been put up.The site creators must retain some control,have you subscribed by email you may then avoid moderation as I have been informed most blogs are inundated with spammers and the like.

I believe the "mad hatter" has been given a space to write his own theories,if you apply you will no doubt receive the same consideration.

Please give the site which is in its early days a chance and some patience,its manifesto is to give people direct help and take action this is plain for everyone to see ,there is no hidden agenda.

Edited by actionnotwords
Link to post
Share on other sites

NAPIERNUTS

POSTS ARE BEING EDITED HERE IMMEDIATELY.

The simple reason your posts on the other site are awaiting moderation is that it is a blog with a very small number maintaining it, it is a non commercial site and free.

I CAN ASSURE YOU IT IS BEING RUN BY TRULY DEDICATED AND GENUINE PEOPLE ALL ARE WELCOME, THERE IS NO CENSORSHIP.

Your comments are no doubt in a queue there are some 300 hits a day there thats the reason they haven't been put up.

 

You are contradicting your own argument.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must congratulate the site team for their stroke of genius in burying an issue and principle that all the participants on the spml/lmc thread fully supported, into this no go area.

I WAS UNDER THE MISTAKEN BELIEF THAT YOU WERE CHAMPIONS OF CONSUMERS AND THAT OWN YOUR CONSCIENCES HAD LED YOU TO TAKE UP YOUR ROLES.AN EASY WAY TO BURY AN ISSUE IS TO PLACE IT HERE WHEN YOU CANNOT DEAL WITH IT WHEN IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEALT WITH ON THREAD AS THE PARTICIPATION OF THE GENUINE POSTERS FROM MY THREAD SHOULD HAVE ALONE INDICATED.

THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE, STILL NO DEFINITIVE ANSWER.

 

As you may be aware this matter will go further to your principal,his direct email address has been requested.Would you please return to me all the posts that you have removed as some if not all of these will be required as evidence when I make my submissions to bankfodder.Thankyou.

 

Thanks to all the people from my thread for their total support.

 

For the last time here is the direct email address for BankFodder.

 

1

9.3 If a user has any issue with action that may have been taken against their account, then they should initially take it up with the Site Team member concerned. If they are unsure who took the action, or did not get a satisfactory response from the Site Team member, then they should contact administration (admin@consumeractiongroup.co.uk). Your complaint will be dealt with in a timely manner, but you are reminded that any decision made in response will be final and non-negotiable. Repeated complaints about the same issue will be ignored.

 

In order to avoid any more problems would you kindly read the site rules ANW so that you can understand the actions taken.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forum-rules-please-read/9-forum-rules-please-read.html#post16

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your complaint would appear to be that CAG is moderating and editing posts. (As it is entitled to do)

 

Whereas, as soon as you post on the other site you are immediately told

 

"

 

"Your comment is awaiting moderation."

 

 

So you are basically complaining that links to a site that moderates posts are being moderated.

 

Hmmm ok

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must admit I had other plans for today, and had hoped that any time I spent on CAG might be better spent.:rolleyes:

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I will stop now.

 

I think I have made my point.

 

I don't have a problem with any of your posts napiernuts. I think you've made some very valid points which confirm that the site team and admin have made the right decisions.

 

Thank you.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel sorry for the Mods with having to deal with this on a Bank Holiday weekend. When do they get time off.

 

It is not as if being a MOD is a highly paid job

So who's getting paid?

Do you know something that I don't?

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Napiernuts

What Point, The Edited Posts I Refer To Are Here Not On The Other Site.

No One Here Is Involved With Capstone And No One Wishes To Help Take Direct Action.

What A Waste Of Time No Wonder This Country's In The S.it.

Goodnight And Goodbye.

THE EMAIL ADDRESS GIVEN GOES TO ADMIN NOT DIRECTLY TO BANKFODDER never mind will find out from the other site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Napiernuts

What Point, The Edited Posts I Refer To Are Here Not On The Other Site.

No One Here Is Involved With Capstone And No One Wishes To Help Take Direct Action.

What A Waste Of Time No Wonder This Country's In The S.it.

Goodnight And Goodbye.

THE EMAIL ADDRESS GIVEN GOES TO ADMIN NOT DIRECTLY TO BANKFODDER never mind will find out from the other site.

 

BankFodder uses the admin email address. The site team are not allowed to give out private email addresses without express permission, and that includes BankFodders.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you please pm me my edited posts I now have the contacts for Marc Gander and bankfodder so will take this up with one or both of them directly.

Before I contact these people.

To get this straight are you saying now that the link I posted was not approved solely because of copyright reasons ?

Would you please kindly list the exact reasons why this the link is currently not approved.

Thankyou for your time and trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So who's getting paid?

Do you know something that I don't?

 

Are you really telling me that

 

CAG

IS BEING RUN BY TRULY DEDICATED AND GENUINE PEOPLE

 

Who give up their spare time freely to help and assist people

 

(who also have work and familes and for that matter lives to live)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You made your request publicly ANW and got a public answer so I suggest you read back over this thread.

 

CAG is run entirely by volunteers, is not commercial and site team don't get paid.

 

BankFodder aka Marc Gander can read all the posts that you have made, so you only have one person to contact.

 

I am not sending either of the unapproved posts to you.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My next post on this thread will be to close it.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where is the definitive answer and reasons for it .

PLEASE DIRECT ME TO IT THEN CLOSE THIS THREAD.

I HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR THIS FOR 24 HOURS.

I MADE AN APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION AND YOU GAVE AN ANSWER STATING THERE WAS A COPYRIGHT ISSUE TO RESOLVE

THERE WAS THEN A POST FROM MARTIN STATING HE HAD POSTED VARIOUS REASONS PREVIOUSLY WHICH HE HAD NOT ABOUT UNAPPROVED LINKS.

ARE YOU NOW STATING CATEGORICALLY THAT THE LINK IS UNAPPROVED AND MARTINS DECISION IS FINAL WITHOUT LEGITIMATE REASON AND THERE IS NO RIGHT OF APPEAL

DESPITE IT COMPLYING WITH THE APPROPRIATE CAG RULES YOU YOURSELF QUOTED.

CAN I PLEASE HAVE A FINAL ANSWER OTHERWISE I COULD WELL END UP IN THE SAME WARD AS THE OTHER UNFORTUNATES POPULATING THIS THREAD AS POSTED IN THE PHOTOGRAPH.

YES OR NO.

FOR COMPLETE CLARITY

1)is the link approved yes or no

2)is the link unapproved yes or no

3)is the link awaiting approval yes or no

4)IF THE LINK IS UNAPPROVED IS THERE A RIGHT OF APPEAL.

 

ALL THIS CONFUSION HAS ARISEN BECAUSE YOU HAVE SAID ONE THING AND MARTIN HAS SAID ANOTHER.

Edited by actionnotwords
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it right the other site does not moderate posts?

 

My posts still say

 

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

 

So much for

 

"Just in case the CAG site team have missed the point, this blog was:

 

a) set up to allow true freedom of legitimate expression,"

 

True freedom of expression is unmoderated, wouldn't you agree ANW & Others

 

Glass houses and stones

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...