Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

northern Bank charges reclaim **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Cat

i'm not legally inclined,but I have picked up a lot in a short time here from some very helpful people.I'm trying to examine the options open to me without the high court avenue.

 

I wonder if a group action would be viable?I may post that in the general section and see what the general opinon is.....

 

I know what you mean about things being personal!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 254
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

This has been raised by a member in my htread about the northern bank...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=6263&page=2

 

in Northern Ireland,as you know,the small claims limit is £2K,but some of us(me included) could well be looking at claims well in excess of that figure.

 

It has been suggested that we band together and go to the High Court in a group action.

 

Now I do not have a clue about this-could someone advise of the pros and cons of such a move?I know there are downsides(not clear on what they are)but I'm aware they do exist....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not something I have any knowledge of, except that if you go to the high court and lose....get ready to pay out big time for the other side's costs.:eek:

  • Confused 1

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This I presume would be similar to class actions in America. I didn't know you could them over here, it wiould be interesting BUT as already said if you lose you are liable for the other side's legal costs. Plus they would have very good lawyers as it could set a precedent and there's no way they would want that. On the other hand they may settle out of court in the face of such a big case.

 

Your other options are only claim up to the limit each, or perhaps put in multiple claims (split one big one into separate smaller ones) - this has been mentioned before but I'm not sure how it works.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Essntially it's very simple, all you do is add up all your charges, and then add interest. What you'll be left with is a series of total which have been adjusted. So if you were charged £30 in May 2003, you would actually be claiming say £35 for this particular charge, because you're including the interest. Now all you do is start from the oldest charges and add them up until you get to the small claims limit. These charges will form your first claim. Go through the process as described in the FAQs (you have read the FAQs, haven't you:mad:), and get your dosh back. Only when this claim is COMPLETELY SETTLED do you start one for the next lot of charges. Repeat until all charges recovered.

 

IMPORTANT: Do not attempt to run multiple claims concurrently. If you do, the bank will very likely turn up in court and have them merged into a single claim, thus taking it out of small claims.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice.If the Northern don't give me the details I need I am going to have to put in an estimate up until the time I have figures provided for.It will work into 3 separate claims in that case!!

 

 

scales duly clicked on, Robert!!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter dated 14 June received this morning from Nuala Walsh,Service Recovery Manager.

 

Jist of this was that my complaint was being taken very seriously,and that they would be investigating it with a view to replying in the next 20 days :rolleyes: my clock is going tick tock in an ever more loud fashion.....

 

Also included a helpful ombudsman leaflet to be added to a growing pile of waste paper!! LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have drafted this letter for posting to the Northern today-

 

22 June 2006

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Dear Ms XXXXX

 

As you will be aware,I wrote to the Northern on April 27 2006 with a DPA request for details of all charges levied on our accounts since their inception.

 

The information I received was totally inadequate,in that details for the past 2 years only were forthcoming.The deadline for full compliance with that DPA request was June 6 2006,and full compliance has not been achieved.The date is now June 22,so you will see that I have been more than reasonable under the terms of the legislation by not adhering strictly to that deadline.

 

Yesterday,I received a further automated charge on my account,which now has a debit balance of £1501.84(as of 21 June).Since my initial inquiry,(including that penalty)a further £113 has been levied in charges.This brings the known total for the 2 years details I have been furnished with to a grand total of £1904-the refund of which would bring our account up to a credit balance of £402.16

 

The overdraft balance on account no xxxxxxxx now consists totally of unlawful penalty charges levied on the account.I require a refund of those charges to our account as an interim measure before refund of the remaining charges for the period of non-disclosure.I would expect the balance on the account to reflect this refund by close of business on Monday 26 June 2006,otherwise the initial sum of £1904 plus interest and costs will be pursued in the Northern Ireland Small Claims Court,beginning on Tuesday 27 June,without prejudicing the further recovery of the charges pre 2004.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Soon As I Asked First Trust For A Written Reason For Their Non-compliance, With A View To Raising A Complaint With The Financial Ombudsmans Office, They Sent All Of The Information That Was Asked For.

 

It Seems To Me That All The Threats In The World Don't Scare These People, But Once They Are Faced With Court Action Or The Ombudsmans Office, They Start To Talk A Different Language

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Lickthewallfatboy

 

Hope your money is back where its supposed to be! (or would I rather see the NB brought to justice in court and publicly embarrassed?) Hard call. . . . . . .

 

I jest. Hope your money is in.

 

Keep us posted.

 

More power to your elbow.

 

Cat

Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck

we really need a success against 1 of the so called big 4 in NI to prove to all that it is possible to make a succesful claim here

 

has anyone had success over here???

 

did you not read about the Belfast taxi driver who threatened the Ulster Bank with court over almost £2K in charges,and they coughed up straight away?

 

Seems to be that if they are put up against a wall,they will buckle like the rest......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just Pulled this off the Consumer council's website:

 

 

 

CONSUMER GETS UNFAIR CHARGES REFUNDED

The Consumer Council in partnership with the BBC Radio Ulster consumer programme, On Your Behalf, has helped Eamonn McGuckin, a Belfast taxi driver, to get over £2000 of unauthorised overdraft charges refunded. It is believed that Mr McGuckin has received the largest penalty charges refund to a banking customer here.

Mr McGuckin used the Consumer Council's two-step guide produced as part of their 'Stop Unfair Charges' campaign to challenge the excessive charges that had been placed on his personal current account by the Halifax bank. This amounted to over £2000 over a 3-year period charged when he went into the red without permission. The bank refunded his charges in full while he was pursuing his case through the Small Claims Court under unfair contract terms legislation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Luck with your claim,

 

I think you can understand by my above post that the Belfast taxi driver had issued proceedings through the Small Claims court before the Halifax coughed up.

 

I think the general consensus of the Banks is to do nothing until proceedings are instigated, sorry I can't help you further on this as you are further down the road than I am at this stage.

 

But keep your chin up and go for it, you will get your money. The Bank just wants to see how far you are prepared to go...

 

again, Good Luck

 

regards

 

 

Bru

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you say,they are prepared to sit back to see how far you will take it.They've called my bluff,and I'm am about to up the ante.I have already started on CITICARDS,although those dumb Indian call centres who throw a wobbly when you deviate from their prepared script still persist in ringing incessantly asking why I haven't sent a payment.

 

When they pay us back around £1400,then they might get some co-operation.....

 

same goes for RBS and Capital One-only a couple of days to go for them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

got a 2 line letter from the Northern this morning- "I am pleased to say my investigations are currently underway and I will respond to you as soon as these investigations are complete,as outlined in my letter of 14 June 2006" too late I'm afraid-claim for £2082 inc interest and costs has just been initiated.(and that's just for the last 2 years)They must think I'm some kind of mug or something!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...