Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
    • We need documents to be uploaded in PDF format. Uploading in Microsoft Word format discloses personal details relating to you which you should not be sharing. Click upload – to understand what to do. How did you pay for the vehicle? You start by saying that you should have walked away – yes you should. Not only because of the reputation of this company but also if the transaction isn't perfect you shouldn't get involved and you certainly shouldn't be taking the word of some used car dealer. Big fail! Why are some of your letter in black and some the in red? When you get some of the ideas in there – have you use a template from somewhere else? They aren't interested in a delay caused by some fire alarm or something. They certainly aren't interested either by the distress you are suffering. They have hundreds of customers who become victims of this kind of thing. All of those customers suffer distress. Big Motoring World don't seem to be very bothered. What are the faults which exist with the vehicle now? Is it just the splashing? Where is the splashing? What is it that is splashing?   Do I also understand that you purchased the vehicle without trying it at all and the first time you were in it and had splashing was after you had made the contract?
    • A claim was issued against you on 22/04/2024 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/05/2024 at 13:28:08 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 07/05/2024 at 01:05:18 Your defence was submitted on 23/05/2024 at 21:20:03 Your defence was received on 24/05/2024 at 08:05:43
    • I drove a friends a car for a few days and I used cuvva car insurance to insure myself for the time period. Here's the problem: I made a mistake with the dates on the insurance, I ended up driving uninsured for one day and I got a speeding ticket. My friend named me as the driver on the Notice of Intended Prosecution as she should and I will take the blame of course. Will met police ask for proof that I was in fact driving? I mean, any more other than me replying to the NIP that I will soon receive from them? Cause I assume that my insurance for the day will be the proof that they need... Secondly,  if caught driving uninsured, what will happen please? I read it's £300 and 6 points. Is that all or is it worse? I'm only asking for information from knowledgable people. If you intent to just mock, you're certainly not helping. Thanks
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Thomson Complaint


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Below is a brief summary of what occured last week. Any help and advice would be most welcome.

 

Flight - Alicante to Birmingham (return leg of package holiday)

 

Scheduled Dep - 0935 GMT 23/3/2010

 

Actual Dep - 0905 GMT 24/3/2010

 

Reason for delay - Actual wording from Thomson :

 

"Due to the adverse weather conditions in Alicante the aircraft operating your flight had to divert to another airport on its outbound flight from the UK. As a result the crew exceeded their legally permitted working hours and were required to take rest on arrival in Alicante. The flight was operated the following day at the earliest oppurtunity"

 

Course of events:

 

Arrived at airport around 0815 CET - flight showing as on time, departure time changed 3/4 times, cancelled around 1700 CET.

 

Taken back to Benidorm by coach, arrived around 2130 CET.

 

 

Are we entitled to any compensation for loss of earnings etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there and welcome to CAG.

 

If I read your post right, you were delayed by just under 24 hours? The air crew comment is fair, assuming it was true.

 

Are you covered by travel insurance? I don't know about compensation, hopefully someone will. If your holiday was with Thomson, you might want to check the ABTA website to see if there's any advice.

Edited by honeybee13
typo, oops.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there and welcome to CAG.

 

If I read your post right, you were delayed by just under 24 hours? The air crew comment is fair, assuming it was true.

 

Are you covered by travel insurance? I don't know about compensation, hopefully someone will. If your holiday was with Thomson, you might want to check the ABTA website to see if there's any advice.

 

Thanks for the welcome and your reply.

 

Yes, we were delayed by just under 24 hours.

 

Surely any organised company would have staff on stand-by to cope with such instances?

 

We are covered by travel insurance. I will check the ABTA website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe so, also did they provide refreshment at the airport etc

 

from the abta website

 

Delays

 

My flight was delayed by six hours. What can I expect from the airline as recompense?

If the flight’s cancelled or delayed more than five hours, and the EC’s Denied Boarding Regulations apply, the airline should offer you a refund of the flight cost, or an alternative flight. The refund is of the flight cost only, not the holiday price if the flight is part of a package holiday.

If the EC’s Denied Boarding Regulations don’t apply, you’re entitled to the assistance and recompense set out in the airline’s conditions of carriage or the tour operator’s booking conditions

Link to post
Share on other sites

thompsons T&C's

 

Passenger delays

In the case of Passenger delay, the air carrier is liable for damage unless it took all reasonable measures to avoid the damage or it was impossible to take such measures. The liability for Passenger delay is limited to 4,150 SDRs (approximately £3,300).

 

 

 

ARTICLE 9 - SCHEDULES, DELAYS, CANCELLATION OF FLIGHTS

9.1 SCHEDULES

9.1.1 The flight times shown in timetables may change between the date of publication and the date you actually travel. We do not guarantee them to you and they do not form part of your contract with us.

9.1.2 Before we accept your booking, we will notify you of the scheduled flight time in effect as of that time, and it will be shown on your Ticket. It is possible we may need to change the scheduled flight time subsequent to issuance of your Ticket. If you provide us with contact information, we will endeavour to notify you of any such changes. If, after you purchase your Ticket, we make a significant change to the scheduled flight time, which is not acceptable to you, and we are unable to book you on an alternate flight which is acceptable to you, you will be entitled to a refund in accordance with Article 10.2.

9.2 CANCELLATION, REROUTING, DELAYS, ETC.

9.2.1 We will take all necessary measures to avoid delay in carrying you and your Baggage. In the exercise of these measures and in order to prevent a flight cancellation, in exceptional circumstances we may arrange for a flight to be operated on our behalf by an alternative carrier and/or aircraft.

9.2.2 Except as otherwise provided by the Convention or the applicable law including, without limitation, EU Regulation 261/2004, if we cancel a flight, fail to operate a flight reasonably according to the schedule, fail to stop at your destination or cease to operate a route, we shall, at our option, either:

9.2.2.1 carry you at the earliest opportunity on another of our scheduled services on which space is available without additional charge and, where necessary, extend the validity of your Ticket; or

9.2.2.2 within a reasonable period of time re-route you to the destination shown on your Ticket by our own services or those of another carrier, or by other mutually agreed means and class of travel without additional charge. If the fare and charges for the revised routing are lower than you have paid, we shall refund the difference; or

9.2.2.3 make a refund in accordance with the provisions of Article 10.2. 9.2.3 Upon the occurrence of any of the events set out in Article 9.2.2, except as otherwise provided by the Convention, the options outlined in Article 9.2.2.1 through 9.2.2.3 are the sole and exclusive remedies available to you and we shall have no further liability to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Below is a brief summary of what occured last week. Any help and advice would be most welcome.

 

Flight - Alicante to Birmingham (return leg of package holiday)

 

Scheduled Dep - 0935 GMT 23/3/2010

 

Actual Dep - 0905 GMT 24/3/2010

 

Reason for delay - Actual wording from Thomson :

 

"Due to the adverse weather conditions in Alicante the aircraft operating your flight had to divert to another airport on its outbound flight from the UK. As a result the crew exceeded their legally permitted working hours and were required to take rest on arrival in Alicante. The flight was operated the following day at the earliest oppurtunity"

 

Course of events:

 

Arrived at airport around 0815 CET - flight showing as on time, departure time changed 3/4 times, cancelled around 1700 CET.

 

Taken back to Benidorm by coach, arrived around 2130 CET.

 

 

Are we entitled to any compensation for loss of earnings etc?

 

Radbrook

 

EC 261/2004 applies to this situation. See here: EUR-Lex - 32004R0261 - EN

 

Under article 9 you are entitled to 'care' from the airline. This includes meals/refreshments in addition to 2 phone calls/emails/faxes. If the delay leads to an overnight stay, then the airline should either book you into accommodation and transport you to/from that accommodation or, if not, then do so yourself and claim the costs back (copies of receipts should be forwarded with your claim.

 

You may also be entitled to compensation for your delay. This right arises from the Sturgeon judgement from November 2009 which gave the same right to compensation to those pax who were delayed in reaching their final destination by more than three hours as to those who had their flights cancelled. See here: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62007J0402:EN:HTML

 

The airlines can still cite 'extraordinary circumstances' in their defence to compensation claims under arts 5 & 7 but the onus is on the airline to prove this to you (if necessary in a small claims court).

 

There have been a number of successful claims brought by pax against airlines who initially claimed that weather was a cause of their delay/cancellation and therefore that they didn't need to pay compensation. Increasingly, the courts have found in favour of passengers as the airlines seem to claim the 'extraordinary circumstances' defence extraordinarily frequently!

 

See here for existing, ongoing, past and successful 261/2004 claims: Flight Mole Forum - Powered by vBulletin

 

Good luck whatever you decide to do.

 

Cityboy62

Link to post
Share on other sites

City,

 

I can't get onto the travelmole site; any chance that you could copy a post relevant to my situation on here, please?

 

I also note, on another thread, you refer to a 'complaints letter template' from the same site; again, any chance a of copy here, please?

 

Sorry to be a pain.

 

Many thanks for your help to date.

 

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...