Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sickness Query


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5195 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

That is fair enough for them to ask for a copy. Wonder what they will do if you get DLA your GP is quite entitle not give you sick notes.

 

You could SAR them they may charge you £10 but you will get everything they have on record about you. However I would be tepted to ask for a copy, play dumb, if they have nothing to hide they should not object.

 

Sorry have to go now any further questions you have that I can help with I will reply in the morning.

 

Sleep tight as far as I can see they are in the wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Benji, going back to your post #23, I'm surprised the company haven't given you much information. Have they said anything to you in meetings or phone calls about correspondence with the insurer?

 

If you've ended up with the Ombudsman, it would suggest that they've exhausted the internal complaints system, but do you know if they tried that?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB

The only comments from my manager & R on home visits with regard to insurers is that they have asked for decision to be reviewed. Now that appeal process is finished that is why they are looking forme to go back within 4 weeks,or redeploy in group within 12 weeks or attend meeting at offices for dismissal as I cannot fulfil contract. I am going to ask for their 3 options as discussed in writing and also for copies of home voisit reports

Benji

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Benji. Of course you want it in writing, I'm amazed they haven't done that.

 

This confuses me on a couple of fronts. Leaving aside why they want you back when you're on sick leave for a moment, why is it 4 weeks for your old job and 12 weeks for a different one, assuming you can do it?

 

So they've appealed the insurer's decision, but have they gone through that company's internal complaints procedure? The fact that you're going to the Ombudsman suggests that they may have done so, but it would be good to know for sure.

 

I imagine you're in touch with the Ombudsman because they don't deal with companies and so your employer can't lodge a complaint there?

 

It would be interesting to know the legal position if someone goes back to work when they're 'signed off'.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Benji

 

Just some more thoughts.

 

Did you know as from the 6th April 1010 GP's will issue fit notes & not medical certificates. These will allow a GP to put more info on i.e. work hours, when you are likely to return to work or anything else that is relevant.

 

Also what do your terms & conditions say about sickness absence & stress/depression.

 

Did you sign a Access to Medical Records Form before being referred to OH.

 

Changes to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA) in December 2005 mean that mental illness no longer has to be a clinically well-recognised condition to be covered. So ‘anxiety’, ‘stress’ and ’depression’ may be sufficient to qualify a person as disabled and therefore covered by the DDA, as long as there is a substantial and long-term effect (for at least a year) on their ability to carry out normal day-to-day duties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Benji and Flower2. I was thinking about the DDA too. Benji is already on DLA, so as he says, even the DWP think he has a problem. And DLA seems quite hard to get, reading the Benefits forum.

 

Benji, are you able to tell us what your disability is? I guess receiving DLA isn't proof on its own, I'm not sure how you prove it.

 

If your employer chooses to say that you can't fulfill your contract, the DDA makes it much more difficult for them. For instance, they're expected to make reasonable adjustments at work to enable you to do either your old job or a different one. I realise you don't want either of them, but it may slow them down a bit. And then there's the depression aspect of it.

 

I'll keep thinking about it. My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB & Flower2

Access to medical records was signed at the beginning

Disability was caused by stroke but I could cope OK before, then work related stress was diagnosed with depression.GP says that I have suffered a form of breakdown mentally aside from the physical aspects increased, ie tremors in my hand have increased, mobility decreased etc Medication has increased. There is no argument from any doctors inc employers doctor that I am not well & work is to blame, hoever insurance won't pay up & now employer is putting pressure on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Benji, thanks for that, it's what I expected.

 

One more question please, then an answer. Is there an intermediary involved with the sickness policy? If there is, I would expect them to be stirring things with the insurer. Of course, your employer may have taken the policy direct.

 

Going back to what I said a few posts back, my OH thinks that your GP and the company's GP or Occ Health doctor should write to the CMO [Chief Medical Officer] of the insurance company. Typically, your claim would be looked at by a claims handler who sits at a desk and decides if the policy conditions have been met. OH thinks this should be escalated to the medical man so he can look at the medical facts.

 

If the CMO is prepared to change the decision, it would short-circuit the Ombudsman process.

 

Sadly, the insurer you are not happy with is the same one that disagreed with qualified medical opinion when I claimed. They are renowned for thinking that work is good for people, even those with mental afflictions. Of course it saves money too....

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HB

No intermediary is involved, but inerestingly my manager let it slip group has only dealt with " you know who " for last 18 months.

My GP would write - no problem but OH doctor is only a fee earning GP for my employer so I dont know if he would bother to get involved

Benji

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what other people think about this, but if their own GP is saying you're unfit for any work, don't they have a responsibility to look after you and help you? Do you think this back to work thing has been sparked off by the insurer declining the claim? I'm not saying it's logical, mind you. I still think it's worth a try. Not quite the same, but I saw an OH man and he was on my side, I felt and was happy to help me.

 

If your GP would write to 'you know who', I think it would be helpful, can't imagine he or she is too pleased about all this.

 

HB

 

Do you read Harry Potter? 'You know who' is the arch enemy, he who must not be mentioned.......

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Already emailed for written info regarding home visit reports etc. Will contact GPs'. Will not respond to their options as I am off sick for another 3 months and they have received copy of sick cert. When they make next move will update info

Cheers

Benji

THANK YOU EVERYONE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather than you speak to thier doctor why not ask your GP to write to him/her. Would cut out the possibilty of you not relating all that is said, also I would think you will get a better outcome as 2 medical proffesionals will be talking to each other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Here is an update. Sickness insurers have written quoting Financial Ombudsman Case ref no stating opposite to employer that final decision not made and they will investigate claim. Employers have issued copies of home visit reports as requested & still state that they expect a response rom me telling which option I accept by 1/4 at latest

Obviously I am not giving them any decision at present - Any other thoughts?

Benji

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you either need to have a report from your GP to Occupational Health doctor or see the Occupational Health doctor.

 

I feel that if you do not agree to talks with your employees they could say you are not helping yourself. I don't think you need to agree to any of the options but do need to talk to them to see what they have on offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...