Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Reclaiming Abbey Charges - where to now?


dfitz24
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5148 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I currently have a claim ongoing with Abbey for bank charges. Am at the stage that my claim was on hold with the banks and have received their standard letter claiming that due to the result of the test case, they will not be refunding my charges.

 

Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated. Have been considering sending the Govan Law Centre letter?

 

Have there been any recent successes for anyone reclaiming from Abbey?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no point in merely sending letters copied from websites if one has no follow-up strategy.

You need to have a complete plan so that you are thoroughly prepared and that you have predicted all outcomes and you are prepared for them as well.

 

We are working on several new particulars of claim against Abbey and against Others which will be made available soon.

 

However, I can tell you that using early version of the new POC we have already managed to have a Finance Company strikeout set-aside and leave to continue, and also an Abbey strikeout set-aside and leave to continue there also.

 

I have no doubt that we will be given leave to continue our claims in every case. Whether we can then win, is another question.

 

However, as far as Abbey - and most of the other banks go, it is very difficult to reconcile their statements in their contracts and to their customers with what they said to the Supreme Court.

Read my front page article.

 

I have high hopes.

However, I have high expectations of an appeal by the banks - in all cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

BankFodder and anyone else,

I also have an ongoing claim with the Abbey for bank charges. The standard letter was sent to me in Dec 2009 advising me of the Supreme Court decision, and I'm sure as in other people's cases, they said that if I don't reply in eight weeks they'll consider the case closed - but I guess I could 're-open' it.

 

Complication in my case is that the Abbey have paid out £980 already to me in December 2008, because of a hardship case I'd mentioned (I mean cos I was in hardship, so I may have to demonstrate that I'm still in financial difficulty?). Total bank charges were approx £3400.

 

Obviously I'd like to claim more, if not most, of the remaining charges (plus interest if possible!) very soon. Not sure how to make my claim sound personal and not just a 'block' claim for historic charges. think I'll have to made a subject access request for bank statements all over again?

 

Would I be able to claim for 6 years from when I made my initial claim, which i think was back in Autumn 2006, and not just from now? I haven't even had an Abbey account since 2006 as I'd closed it ages ago! I will try to find the original statements sent but I can't guarantee I can find them!

 

Thanks,

PCB

Edited by Poor-Credit Borrower
Put the last "Abbey" in red and bold
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Having searched through documentation that I have received from Abbey, I have several T&C's booklets but not the Tariff of Charges relating to my current account. Is it possible to obtain them on the site? Thought I saw somewhere that a library of documents was being compiled? If so any guidance as to where they can be found would be greatly appreciated. I have held the account since 2004. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I hope you can help, My wife and I like many others waited nervously for the highcourts decision and were very disapointed at the outcome. Having recieved no correspondance from the court with regard to the status of our 2 stayed claims, we have recently received a statement with regard to our joint account which at the time the court case was stayed had an active overdraft, the (what I assume is a yearly statement) showes the ammount but not as a Minus figure but just as a balance (a ploy i think for us to enquire) I know for a fact that the account owes them money.

My concern is this, we have recieved nothing from the court regarding the stayed claims, only two yearly staments from Santander with regard to the overdraft ammount, one statement was sent during the stay and one was sent after the high court case.

My question is what should we do, we are currently in the process of setting up a debt management program.

Two account claims.

US

Them

2 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)'s sent 14/08/06 (recieved 15/08/06).

2 Microfiche (foboff) letters and 2 sets of statements (14 months worth) recieved 24/08/06.

2 Microfiche counter letters sent 29/08/06 (recieved 30/08/06).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, there are now three enquiries on this thread that do not seem to have been answered yet. Mine was on the 12th April.

 

Would anyone on the site team, or any other experienced CAGger, tell me whether I can make a second subject access request to the Abbey? Anyway, the first such request was made by a third party licit legal.

 

Also can I request a re-opening of my original claim and not just claim from now? As it will make 3 years difference according to the 6-year rule!

 

Maybe I'll look at the related thread on Abbey charges too.

 

PCB

Link to post
Share on other sites

:?Hi, having read one of the front page articles you referred to a library of documents being collected regarding Abbey and their misrepresentation of charges. Unfortunately within my Abbey paperwork I no longer have any of the 'Tariff of Charges' that stated the charges where for the purpose of covering administration. Are these possibly available on the site or by request at all? I have searched through the site and am currently having no luck. Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...