Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wonga payday loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I hope someone could give me some advice on how to deal with Wonga payday loan company. I borrowed £700 on 1 November 2009 with the agreement to pay back on 30 November 2009. In the middle of November my husband became ill and was signed off work and only received SSP therefore my wages suddenly became the main wages and therefore had to pay rent etc. I rang Wonga to explain but could not get through as they were "experiencing high call volumes" I left a message for somebody to call me back - but nothing. I then emailed them and the reply just said for me to call them!! which I did again - same result as above. This has now been going on for now for three months with my offer of repayment being declined every time. With interest and all the charges they now say I owe them £2020!!!! on a £700 loan. They are now sending letters from Barker and Lowe their recoveries (Wonga in disguise) saying they are authorised to send doorstep collectors - am I write in thinking unless I invite them in I can say they are trespassing or they will take me to court. I have told them I would quite happily go to court and explain to a judge that my financial situation as altered dramatically since I took the loan out and they just will not listen.:confused:

 

I just dont understand why they will not deal with anything via email or in writing they just keep telling me to phone them and then when I do I either cannot get through or they just keep spouting that they will only accept full payment.

 

Does anyone know how to deal with this company I am getting so worried :(

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company are NOT AUTHORISED to send doorstep collectors, they are unlicenced and have no right to ask you for any money.

 

I think as your husband is ill and you are on a low wage you need to contact Citizens Advice and see if Wonga can be reported to the Moneylending unit for their atrocious behaviour.

 

Really their system is appalling and they need stopping.

 

Be aware that you may get letters from Marstons Court Enforcement stating they have a right to collect and use bailiffs, but in your case they CAN NOT SEND A BAILIFF. The only people who can send a bailiff is the court after you have defaulted on a CCJ - and Wonga are unlikely to go there as their charges and interest are very dubious.

 

If you get any more aggro get your local MP involved as well, many of them are becoming more active in this type of field now the elections are looming.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do everything in writing, send following letter recorded delivery.

 

Re: Harassment by telephone and doorstep visitslink3.gif.

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXX

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone callslink3.giflink3.gif that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls.

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone callslink3.giflink3.gif from your company will be recorded.

 

Furthermore, should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep visit”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make such an appointment with you.

 

There is an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v Sheppard & Short Ltd [1959] 2 QB 384. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and, if you do so, you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

It is unfortunate that I feel forced to send this letter due to the attitudes and continued missconduct from your employees that have previously visited me at the above adress and have treated my family and myself with abusive behaviour, this will not be tolerated and will be reactivly dealt with by imediete contact of the police to enforce the law.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

[NAME HERE]

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey thanks for the great info. I've since read a few more postings here on Wonga and other dubious pay day loans and I am not definitely not alone Thank you all for your replies and valuable help.

 

One thing I have learned out of this sorry mess is that payday loans are something definitely to avoid and anyone thinking about using them - think twice you never know if your circumstances are going to change unexpectedly.

 

I will keep you all posted!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

Sorry that you are in trouble with this company. It is a total nightmare but I think perserverance and sticking to your guns is the key. I refuse point blank to deal with anything over the phone. Always email or write and keep emailing them and then you have a record of anything that is agreed. I have now told them that I will pay back £200 per month and they have accepted this. I then emailed them back to say it would be only by postal order as I do not trust them not to go in and raid my bank account. I have said that if this is not acceptable to them then they are effectively refusing repayment of the loan. I do not think a judge would be impressed with a company that refuses payment because they dont like it!! I have basically told them if they want to take it to court then I would be more than happy for them to explain to a judge their extortionate interest rates and charges they apply when people cannot pay back on the agreed date normally because of a change of financial circumstances.

 

They cannot authorise doorstep collectors only a county court can do that. So just keep on keeping on at them and grind them down as they try to do to us! Good Luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...