Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you can help spare me the trouble of going through the thread again: you shipped this PlayStation directly by entering into a direct contract with EVRi – correct? You didn't use a parcel broker – correct? In their defence they keep on referring to the "shipper" – not "claimant". The shipper is you – correct? They offered you insurance for the item. Did you insure or not? Those questions for starters, please
    • To turn out to the action that you should take. You should not stand for any nonsense. You should decide absolutely that you are going to return the car. Of course you made a big mistake by paying for it by debit card. Although slightly better than paying by cash or paying by bank transfer. Is the vehicle currently stored off-road? The first thing you must do is you must get an independent report. You must write to big motoring world immediately. You still are within your 30 days. Write a letter of rejection. Tell them that you are rejecting the vehicle for a full refund. It is defective. Give them a list of the defects which have occurred so far and explain to BMW that as they apparently refuse to accept your own account of the defects on the vehicle even though they are supported by photographic evidence, you are now booking in for an independent inspection by an authorised VW dealer. This inspection will cost £XXX and you will be seeking to recover that sum from them when the vehicle is returned. Tell them that your decision to reject the vehicle's absolute. You're not interested in any repair offers. You have read sufficiently about them on the Internet to understand that they are not to be trusted. Tell them that as soon as you have had the independent inspection which you fully expect will confirm the faults, you provide them with a copy of the report together with a bill for the inspection and if they will not make immediate arrangements to recover the vehicle, to refund you the cost of the vehicle and the cost of the inspection – together with any other expenses reasonably incurred [list out any expenses such as insurance, road fund tax – et cetera et cetera], then you will start an action against them and without any further notice. Tell them that you are currently storing the vehicle off-road and unless they make immediate arrangements to collect it at their expense will also start adding a daily storage charge of £10 per day and this will be added to the court claim which you will be making against them. If you're happy with this approach then book the inspection immediately. Come back here when you have a date for it and we will then complete this draft letter and send it to them and the draft letter will also contain a deadline after which you will begin a legal action. Let me tell you now that if you aren't prepared to go this route, then you may as well give up because we are all wasting your time and you better accept the slap and be more careful in future. I see that you are griping a bit about £240 cost of an independent report. As I have said, you will in all likelihood recover this although it will take a court action. However, I'm afraid that this is the kind of thing that you will have to accept when you buy a vehicle without first researching the dealer and also you buy it at a considerable distance from your own home. Although you are well within the 30 days, today we are pretty well at the end of 26 February. I suggest you get a move on  
    • Thanks Dave and JK.   So I need to get an email off to the court ASAP?  This has been assigned to Cardiff County Court now so I'm guessing this will need to go them now rather than to the Northampton bulk processing centre? Is there a template for this email I can use?  I just want to make sure I'm including all the right things. Thanks CD
    • Firstly, in response to your questions: If you are rejecting the vehicle for defects then it is certainly the responsibility to cover all of the expenses incurred in returning the car to them and frankly they should be responsible for the collection. The consumer rights act does not refer to this and so we have to resort to the common law of contract in respect of which, the seller will be responsible for all of the losses/expenses incurred as a direct result of their breach of contract. In terms of recovering a rate per mile for the use of the vehicle which you have had in the first 30 days – the wisdom seems to be that no they can't. After 30 days it's a different matter. However, once again the consumer rights act is silent on this but the motoring ombudsman seems to say that they are not entitled to recover anything for the usage of the vehicle during the first 30 days if it has been rejected for defects during that period. Once again the consumer rights act is silent. However, it will be prudent for you to provide your own inspection. If you haven't understood yet, Big Motoring World is a car dealership which is self-serving in its interests and is not customer facing and is turning out in respect of customers who buy defective vehicles, to be pretty untrustworthy and very defensive. I have no doubt that lots of customers by vehicles very successfully and are happy but what we are seeing here and also on the Facebook complaints page is that when things go wrong – Big Motoring World are totally unsupportive. You could try to back if you want – but referring to the above point, you should get your own independent inspection from a reputable source. A VW specialist dealer. The information we have is that if you simply return it to BMW, they may carry out some kind of inspection and they may then report back to you that there was no such fault or else they will say that they have discovered a fault but they repaired it and that you are not obliged to take the car back. It would not be a good idea to take this vehicle back. You absolutely need to get rid of it and give your business a some other company which is apparently more reliable – although you need to do some solid research. To add to this – and I suppose you won't be happy with this criticism – I never understand anybody who buys a vehicle a hundred miles away or so. It is asking for trouble. So many people do this and a lot of them come a cropper simply because of the mileages involved in returning the car even for a minor repair. Here is a video for you to watch. It may be too late for you but others will visit this thread – hopefully before they buy their vehicles – and they will learn something about how to survive the trauma of a used car purchase. also, make sure that you have read and understood our used car guide. You won't really enjoy what you read, very much that you can consider that they are lessons for the future – and of course anybody else who visits this thread should benefit from your unfortunate experience.
    • Yes, if she outs you it should take her out of the loop. However I don't know for sure, because I understand there's a time limit to do this and don't know if its a statutory thing under POFA or just someting the they make up. Maybe LFI could comment?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mrs M A&L Bryan Carter


MandM
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5093 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had this thread somewhere else but thought I should post on the PPI forum

 

I am not sure how to claim the PPI my daughter had on this loan as we cannot work out with the calculators because it was not a single premium. Could some one take a look and advise.

 

This loan was paid off 6 months later with another loan but no PPI taken.

 

 

ALagreement.jpg

ALagreement2.jpg

ALagreement3.jpg

ALagreement4.jpg

 

Mrs M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been looking more closely at this A&L account my daughter has.

 

The original thread was to work out the PPI that she had on the first loan with them in 2006 but having received her SAR back from A&L I have noticed that her current loan which she has with them has never had a DN put on this account. Both Fredrickson and Global debt Management have been asking for the whole balance to be paid in full.

 

In fact the first DCA Collect Direct UK were asking for the full balance back in December 08. We offered to pay them £3000 to settle in June 08 when she had only missed 1 payment and had lost her job. They refused and told her she had to go on payment plan. She paid this for a while but they kept badgering her to pay more so, she stopped paying them. They constantly phoned her, sent texts to her and generally made her life a misery.

 

Obviously we did not know about CAG back then but we do now. The reason I am putting this up is because I have now found out that BRYAN CARTER is now on the case. I also noticed that the so called SAR we got back consisted of 3 pages of so called diary and telephone log, but I have noticed that there is no mention of the letter they sent last year about her PPI. Unfortunately she never kept the letter. I am thinking now that I should ask them for all the correspondence they have on her account. I will put up the correspondence she has received so far in the order they were received and maybe someone can have a look I am sorry there are a few but they are all relevant I think.

 

002.jpg

 

003.jpg

 

 

004.jpg

 

005-1.jpg

 

007.jpg

 

008.jpg

 

009.jpg

 

010.jpg

 

12.jpg

 

011.jpg

 

briancarter.jpg

 

As I mentioned there could well be some letters missing as my daughter had a habit of binning some, and until we get the rest of the copy correspondence from A&L it is hard to tell, although as I said I can not find a DN mentioned in the diary.

 

I am hoping that all the attachments dont crash my system. Here goes.

Mrs M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have put together a letter to A&L asking for all the correspondence between them and my daughter. Can any one advise if it needs to be changed in any way.

 

Dear Madam

 

Thank you for your letter concerning my Subject Access Request.

 

I appreciate the documents that you have sent but I feel that these do not constitute a complete SAR.

 

I would appreciate it if you would send me the copies of all the correspondence that have been sent to me by your company and copies of all the correspondence on file that you have received from me.

 

Thanks Mrs M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been looking more closely at this A&L account my daughter has.

 

The original thread was to work out the PPI that she had on the first loan with them in 2006 but having received her SAR back from A&L I have noticed that her current loan which she has with them has never had a DN put on this account. Both Fredrickson and Global debt Management have been asking for the whole balance to be paid in full.

 

In fact the first DCA Collect Direct UK were asking for the full balance back in December 08. We offered to pay them £3000 to settle in June 08 when she had only missed 1 payment and had lost her job. They refused and told her she had to go on payment plan. She paid this for a while but they kept badgering her to pay more so, she stopped paying them. They constantly phoned her, sent texts to her and generally made her life a misery.

 

Obviously we did not know about CAG back then but we do now. The reason I am putting this up is because I have now found out that BRYAN CARTER is now on the case. I also noticed that the so called SAR we got back consisted of 3 pages of so called diary and telephone log, but I have noticed that there is no mention of the letter they sent last year about her PPI. Unfortunately she never kept the letter. I am thinking now that I should ask them for all the correspondence they have on her account. I will put up the correspondence she has received so far in the order they were received and maybe someone can have a look I am sorry there are a few but they are all relevant I think.

 

002.jpg

 

003.jpg

 

 

004.jpg

 

005-1.jpg

 

007.jpg

 

008.jpg

 

009.jpg

 

010.jpg

 

12.jpg

 

011.jpg

 

briancarter.jpg

 

As I mentioned there could well be some letters missing as my daughter had a habit of binning some, and until we get the rest of the copy correspondence from A&L it is hard to tell, although as I said I can not find a DN mentioned in the diary.

 

 

I have put together a letter to A&L asking for all the correspondence between them and my daughter. Can any one advise if it needs to be changed in any way.

 

Dear Madam

 

Thank you for your letter concerning my Subject Access Request.

 

I appreciate the documents that you have sent but I feel that these do not constitute a complete SAR.

 

I would appreciate it if you would send me the copies of all the correspondence that have been sent to me by your company and copies of all the correspondence on file that you have received from me.

 

Thanks Mrs M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andrew.

 

Nothing yet, they received the letter on the 3rd so will post as soon as I get something back.

 

Mrs M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi. Update.

Still nothing back from A&L concerning the rest of the SAR. Now 15 days. Not a peep from Brian Carter either.

 

Any ideas what I should be doing now.

 

Mrs M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...