Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Changes in the US are enticing more people to file bankruptcy to clear their student loans.View the full article
    • Servicing Stop Limited Registered Office Address: 57 London Rd, Enfield, Middlesex, England, EN2 6DU Company Type: Private Limited Company Company Status: Active Company Number: 06558606 Directors: Oliver Joseph Richmond Appointed 8th April 2008, Toby Robert Richmond Appointed 8th September 2009 Companies House Link: SERVICING STOP LIMITED overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK SERVICING STOP LIMITED - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual...   Endole Link: Servicing Stop Limited - Company Profile - Endole SUITE.ENDOLE.CO.UK Servicing Stop Limited is an active company located in Enfield, Greater London. View Servicing Stop Limited profile, shareholders, contacts...  
    • Hi I assume the Loft Conversion with the eaves and crawl space was there when you initially purchased the property. Even in done after purchasing the property and the correct permissions were in place i.e. Local Authority, Land Registry, Freeholder which is Southern Land which would be required as a Leasehold property. The difficulty is if the Loft Conversion was there when you purchased the property and there is no evidence in your documents of the eaves and crawl space due to where the Red Lines stop in the plans or even after purchase it was added this is the reason you are having issues with selling due to those missing Red Lines in the Plans and any other Buyers competent Solicitor would flag this up. I can understand the reasons the Buyer wishes a Deed of Variation probably there Solicitor requesting this to ensure those missing red lines are covered before the Sale as they Flagged this as an issue as Red Lines missing on Plans and want buyer protected. As for the £8000 costs Together and cohort Southern Land are trying to charge have you thought of contacting a few Property Solicitors yourself to get a few quotes. (only mention this because when I research this possible costs can range from £500 - £2000 depending on the Deed of Variation work required and nothing to stop you doing this then approaching Together and cohorts with it) Also ask Together/Southern Land for a breakdown of the £8000 costs for the Deed of Variation. Yup do send both Together and Southern Land a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that data in whether it be emails, written, recorded calls etc. They then have 30 Calendar Days to respond and that time limit only starts once they acknowledge receipt of your SAR Request. When you purchased the property some 17yrs ago are the Solicitors that you went through at that time still operating? (I know probably a silly question but if they are nothing to stop you contacting them and asking them about this especially if the Loft Conversion was in place when you purchased the property) Another link that will be useful to you as Leasehold is The Leasehold Advisory Service: Home - The Leasehold Advisory Service WWW.LEASE-ADVICE.ORG Government funded, independent advice for residential leaseholders and park home residents  
    • Why struggling parents aren't choosing cheaper brands when it comes to infant formula milk.View the full article
    • Musk's profane attack on advertisers baffled experts - without adverts, how would X survive?View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
    • Post in Some advice on buying a used car
    • People are still buying used cars unseen, paying by cash or by bank transfer, relying on brand-new MOT's by the dealer's favourite MOT station….
      It always leads to tears!
      used car.mp4

       

       
    • Pizza delivery insurance.mp4


       

       

       

      Parcel delivery insurance 1.mp4
        • Haha
      • 2 replies
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5033 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI there,

 

I was wondering if someone could clarify something for me as i have been searching on the web and have found nothing relevant as yet, if i do find te information i am looking for i will post it up here.

 

i have an issue with High Court Enforcement Ltd who entered my shop claiming to have a warrant of execution to collect on a debt. This a debt that has supposedly gone to court and jugement was made against us despite us never receiving any paperwork notifying us of legal action.

 

we told the bailliffs that we did not know anything about the hearing and has received no paprwork whatsoever , this was the first we had heard about it, we were told that was irrelevant as the paperwork has been sent first class and was deemed received regardless of whether it was delivered or dumped in the local woods by the posty.

 

the bailliffs proceeded to levy on all the goods and equipment in the shop regardless of being on hire purchase or not, we told then it was an illegal global levy and that it was on the tools of our trade to which they have claimed that tills and shop equipment cannot be regrded as tools of the trade as they can be operated by a third party and are therefore not personal.

 

we sent notices to the baillifs stating the above and that we were not actually the defendants on the warrant anyway, nor was our premises as named on the warrant ( it has the old owners shop name ) furthermore we noticed them that all chattels and possessions on the premises were privately owned.

 

the bailliffs agreed to suspend the warrant for two weeks so that the matter could be sorted out with the supplier, and as a gesture of good will we paid the small amount that was outstanding - ( last paperbill , before we took over) seemed alot less grief and we wanted to get the matter sorted ASAP

 

The supplier has received the payment and has accepted the payment , we have eletronic proof of delivery and recorded royal mail barcode etc but upon receiving payment the supplier has instructed the bailliffs to lift the suspension and enforce the warrant.

 

we have been give 5 days to pay again or arrange an installment plan or the bailliffs have advised that they will be breaking in whether we are there or not on order to size the levied goods - at no point have we signed a walking possesion order - i wrote refused for cause - invalid levy across the orignal form they left and sent it back to then - and they will do this regardless of the fact that there will be a minor on teh premises ( my daughter)

 

with additional fees this has now escalated to well over £1000 and i know there is not enough in the shop to cover the debt if it goes to auction - thats is the take all the shelving as well - its a tiny village sweet shop

 

if what they seize is not enough to cover the debt can they come back again to try and seize goods in payment of the balance , or is one seizure all they get. What they happened to any remaining debt?

 

we cannot be there when they intend to break in my 17 year old will be as we will be in court attending a bankruptcy hearing.

 

situation seems to be we lose everything if we stay and lose everything if we go - can't win

 

the bailliffs have said if we have a problem we can phone the police when they get here, which we dont want to do as we know the local village police that will turn up. In a previous encounter with bailliffs they stated they were there to assist the bailliffs which we know is untrue they would only be there to prevent a breach of the peace, we made a formal complaint then about the actions of the police and the case was refused and returned by the IPCC

-----

 

 

If you live with one leg permanently in the past and one leg permanently in the future, you can't but help pee on the present !

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI there,

 

I was wondering if someone could clarify something for me as i have been searching on the web and have found nothing relevant as yet, if i do find te information i am looking for i will post it up here.

 

i have an issue with High Court Enforcement Ltd who entered my shop claiming to have a warrant of execution to collect on a debt. This a debt that has supposedly gone to court and jugement was made against us despite us never receiving any paperwork notifying us of legal action.

 

Could you explain what type of debt this was for and for how much? If you have never received any notification about Court proceedings you can apply for Set Aside - cost £75 Form N244 from HMCS website.

 

we told the bailliffs that we did not know anything about the hearing and has received no paprwork whatsoever , this was the first we had heard about it, we were told that was irrelevant as the paperwork has been sent first class and was deemed received regardless of whether it was delivered or dumped in the local woods by the posty.

 

Unfortunately whether you received it or not has nothing to do with the HCEO, he is there to act on Writ on behalf of the High Court.

 

the bailliffs proceeded to levy on all the goods and equipment in the shop regardless of being on hire purchase or not, we told then it was an illegal global levy and that it was on the tools of our trade to which they have claimed that tills and shop equipment cannot be regrded as tools of the trade as they can be operated by a third party and are therefore not personal.

 

They are allowed to do this unfortunately, it is up to you to provide proof of 3rd Party ownership. This needs to be done ASAP. Anything they accept will be removed from their levy.

 

we sent notices to the baillifs stating the above and that we were not actually the defendants on the warrant anyway, nor was our premises as named on the warrant ( it has the old owners shop name )

 

They can rely on the basis of probabilities that they have the correct address.

 

furthermore we noticed them that all chattels and possessions on the premises were privately owned.

 

Sorry don't quite understand this comment.

 

the bailliffs agreed to suspend the warrant for two weeks so that the matter could be sorted out with the supplier, and as a gesture of good will we paid the small amount that was outstanding - ( last paperbill , before we took over) seemed alot less grief and we wanted to get the matter sorted ASAP

 

How & who exactly did you pay? To have got to this stage debt has to be approx £600+

 

The supplier has received the payment and has accepted the payment , we have eletronic proof of delivery and recorded royal mail barcode etc but upon receiving payment the supplier has instructed the bailliffs to lift the suspension and enforce the warrant.

 

I assume now you sent payment direct to the Claimant, they will have directed it to the HCEO and they will be looking for their fees.

 

we have been give 5 days to pay again or arrange an installment plan or the bailliffs have advised that they will be breaking in whether we are there or not on order to size the levied goods - at no point have we signed a walking possesion order - i wrote refused for cause - invalid levy across the orignal form they left and sent it back to then - and they will do this regardless of the fact that there will be a minor on teh premises ( my daughter)

 

Doesn't really matter whether you sign or not.

 

with additional fees this has now escalated to well over £1000 and i know there is not enough in the shop to cover the debt if it goes to auction - thats is the take all the shelving as well - its a tiny village sweet shop

 

if what they seize is not enough to cover the debt can they come back again to try and seize goods in payment of the balance , or is one seizure all they get.

 

Yes

 

What they happened to any remaining debt?

 

Still has to be paid

 

we cannot be there when they intend to break in my 17 year old will be as we will be in court attending a bankruptcy hearing.

 

You don't know exactly when they will return. They should let you know when they come but they can just turn up and unfortunately if the door is locked they are allowed to enter by force. If your daughter is on the premises it may pay to ask her to cooperate.

 

situation seems to be we lose everything if we stay and lose everything if we go - can't win

 

the bailliffs have said if we have a problem we can phone the police when they get here, which we dont want to do as we know the local village police that will turn up. In a previous encounter with bailliffs they stated they were there to assist the bailliffs which we know is untrue they would only be there to prevent a breach of the peace, we made a formal complaint then about the actions of the police and the case was refused and returned by the IPCC

 

I appreciate what I have said above does not make things any better or is of much help however you must do the following this weekend and if possible hand the appropriate documents in personally.

 

As mentioned above because you did not get the original docs from the Court you were not given the opportunity to mount a defence/counterclaim/payment plan, subsequently you have been found "guilty" and Judgment by Default has been made against you. Therefore you are allowed to apply to the Court where the CCJ was issued to Set Aside the CCJ, this then gives you the another chance to defend the Claim. To do this go to HMCS website for Form N244 - you can fill this in online and print it out or just print a blank and fill it in manually - read the next part before you finish.

 

The most important matter to address is the HCEO - High Court matters take precedence over County Court. On the same Form N244 you also need to apply for a Stay of Execution pending your Set Aside claim. This will halt any further action or charges by the HCEO until your Set Aside is heard. If you win Set Aside then all associated HCEO actions and fees have to stopped/refunded. Please note and I cannot stress this strongly enough a claim for Set Aside on its own will not stop any HCEO action you MUST apply for the Stay.

 

If applicable you can get any fee remission by filling out Form EX160 also on the HMCS website.

 

I would strongly suggest that if you decide to take this course of action that you hand in personally the forms at the Court and ask if they can give you a date then and there. On returning home immediately inform the HCEO of what is happening - until they receive any paperwork they may still decide to go ahead with further enforcement - if this does happen ring the Court and explain what is happening.

 

In the meantime is it possible you can scan whatever documents you have and post them on here - removing personal bits - the chances are you can argue some of the charges applied.

 

Sorry for the long post and hope you have paracetamol handy.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...