Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCA via email


Knackered
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5242 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, my first post...

I requested via email, a copy of a hire purchase agreement (2005) for which I am being pursued for a large balance. The goods were repossessed and sold at auction well below value. The dca confirmed receipt of the email by return and that they had referred the account back to the original creditor with a request for a copy of the agreement under the consumers act 1974.

 

They said they will chase for the agreement but warned me that they are limited in the number of requests that they can send.

 

I received this initial reply fifteen days ago.

 

Have I messed up by not sending them the request via recorded delivery with £1.00 fee??

 

What I want to know is, is whether acknowledgment of an 'email' that requests a copy of an agreement is the same as sending a recorded delivery letter and £1.00. I just didn't think at the time.

 

If not, should I now do that?

 

Also, if an email is as good as a letter, and that as I have been waiting over fourteen days for the agreement, can they now 'not' pursue the debt via the courts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly you must send it via royal mail with a £1 PO.

however, just remember that even if it turns out to be unenforceable, it does not make the debt go away

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would personally go down the old fashioned route of recorded delivery and your £1 postal Order. It is stated in the Consumer Credit Act that you should send your £1 postal order, so send that off recorded delivery and you have stuck to your side of the bargain. And make sure you send a PO and DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING!!!! Print off the POD as well when it is available.

 

The debt won't go away, it just can't be enforced unless it goes through court, although as yours was drawn up in 2005, different legislation may apply.

 

But if it is a debt that is unenforceable, then you won't be entitled to pay anything towards it unless a court tells you too. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for those replies guys. If the debt is unenforceable to what extent and can/do they pursue you? What are the best and worst case scenarios likely to be.

As no higher authority such as a court will be taking a view either way, what mechanisms are available for the creditor to collect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is unenforceable all they can do is send their threat o gram drivel and pester you on the phone for the next 6 years until it is statue barred.

 

This doesn't mean they won't try to enforce it in the courts, but if you defend they will lose

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick reply Alf, the annoying thing with this debt is that all that I owe is interest and that is after they sold the goods at auction at a stupid value:mad:

 

I will give them another week or so then do as scottyboy recommends and send the proper letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, when it was passed to the dca last summer, I had a right go about what the goods had been sold for and asked them over the phone for a copy of the agreement as I wanted to check it out (not, by the way, to see if it was un/enforceable). I heard nothing for about six months then they wrote to me in Jan this year with a statement. etc. I told them to only contact me in writing and sent the email at the same time. They then wrote back and confirmed receipt of the email and noted its contents, confirmed they had requested the agreement copy, and that the account was now placed on hold.

 

I am still waiting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...