Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is my slightly amended WS taking on board your previous comments, any suggestions for amendments would be most appreciated.  Thank you for you time.   1.        I am the Defendant in this matter. 2.        The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. 3.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 4.        The alleged Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address. 5.        The Judgement debt was not familiar to me so I began investigations to ascertain what the debt related to and how such a figure had been equated in any event. 6.        I made immediate contact with the Court, the Claimant Solicitors and the Claimants thereafter, asking them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.  7.        I sent a Data Subject access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided – See appendix 1 which details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclaycard as well as copies of correspondence between us. 8.        I do not admit to entering an agreement with Barclaycard in 2000. 9.       The claimant has failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis and therefore this claim should be automatically struck out.  10.    The claimants have failed to disclose a true executed copy of the original agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim. They are not entitled to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 12.   The reconstituted standard Barclaycard agreement that the claimant has included in the court bundle does not satisfy any CCA request and so the claimant is and remains in default of my CCA request and therefore unable to enforce the alleged agreement. 13.  The claimants have failed to provide proof the assignment, such as a deed of assignment. 14.  The claimant has failed to provide a statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement 15.   Despite numerous requests to the claimant, I have still not seen any evidence, such as an original agreement or deed of assignment, that substantiates the claimant’s assertion that I owe the debt to the claimant, nor evidence of how the debt was accrued. 16.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
    • A set aside application costs £275 which is more than the judgement so not worth it. Not that they would grant a set aside anyway.  Set asides are granted, for example, to people who moved and didn't get the court papers, so have a genuine reason for not defending.  Forgetting doesn't count. Your only choices are to pay up within 30 days, or defy the court and not pay.  If the latter, we've never seen a PPC enforce judgement for a single ticket, ever, you would get away without paying - but you would have a CCJ and a knackered credit file for six years.
    • oh no just logged in and it says a judgment was issued literally 2 hours ago! see attached Screenshot 2024-04-29 214754.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fancy a laugh?


JimmySpangle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5197 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Here is the dilema. I recently bought a Corsa diesel with 89k on the clock. Full history, well almost. Was due a service.

 

Now, I always do my own servicing but as this car has a full history I wanted a Masterfit quickie service. Basically an oil and filter change and book stamped with the nice Griffin.

 

So, I ring my local Evans Halshaw Vauxhall Stealership. Can they do it? Yes. What will I get? Just oil syphoned out, new oil filter, new oil, one stamp in the book. Great, how much? £69.95 +Vat!

 

After I got back off the floor and contained my side splitting hysterics I said.... 'No, really.... how much'.

 

I do not see that I will be adding £70 to the value of the car (cost £2k and worth £2,750), so stuff them. Literally a 10 minute job and when I do it, the sump polug comes out to get all the crap out before adding nice new oil.

 

Having a laugh!:shock:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stealership.

 

:D

 

 

Just write a note with the day you did any work on the car and what it was. Keep it with your records.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Jimmy,

 

When your service goes mamory up, do you write to yourself, phone TS and complain about yourself, threaten SOGA or blame the dog barking? :D

 

Seriously though, they make huge money on the oil which you can buy for a third if not less through a factor and the filter the same. And as regards syphoning it out.......well it's easier usually to drop the polug as you say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As an Ex Evans Halshaw employee in the accounts department of the local Renault dealership (now hanging head in shame)

 

When I was there 2 years ago, I know that EH charged out labour at £32.50 the hour!!!

 

The mechanics were paid £8.50 the hour (hubby was there at the same time)

 

I was embarrassed looking at some of the invoices from suppliers and knowing what the charged out to customers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you replaced the copper sump-plug washer at the same time.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL at some of the answers....

 

I do understand that the big stealers have very expensive showrooms and lots of staff, someone has to pay for thet - it just won't be me.

 

Yes, I do replace the sump washer. I have a pack of 20 I bought a year or so ago.

 

I buy the oil from vauxhall when they have their 4 for the price of 3 offer on. Works out at about £6 a gallon.

 

Lol at Helios. Yep, I write myself a stern letter. I am very methodical with my servicing. Brake fluid has just been replaced completely as dispite the fact that the car is 5 years old and has a full Vauxhall history, the brake fluid was still the original! You and I know 2 years max and change it.

 

Interestingly they have changed the cambelt - which is difficult on a 1.3 CDTi Vauxhall as they have a chain (not cambelt), and it is the original one still.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL at some of the answers....

 

Lol at Helios. Yep, I write myself a stern letter. I am very methodical with my servicing. Brake fluid has just been replaced completely as dispite the fact that the car is 5 years old and has a full Vauxhall history, the brake fluid was still the original! You and I know 2 years max and change it.

 

Interestingly they have changed the cambelt - which is difficult on a 1.3 CDTi Vauxhall as they have a chain (not cambelt), and it is the original one still.

 

Im getting very concerned about your servicing technique Jimmy!

 

For a start you probably used seat covers and floor mats, you probably delivered the job on time and to the price you quoted yourself, I doubt if you left the obligitory service signature of a greasy paw mark over the bonnet or wing and I doubt that you changed the radio frequency to Funky FM. Further you have not supplied an open ended list of totally unneccessary repairs needed which needs a mortgage to fix. To compound it, you did not take the car for a blast past a school at 70mph to get yourself a speeding ticket three months after the event and you probably recorded what you had done in the service book.

 

The next thing is I expect you will take full responsibility for the work you have done in creating more problems.

 

This is totally against the aftermarket car industry ethics that exist and you should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself. Shoddy work in deed. I'm appalled.:eek:

 

AND, you had the audacity to realise the brake fluid needed changing and worked out the difference between a cam belt and chain.

 

You could trigger a National Strike here!!

 

What next?

 

Shocking......very very shocking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must confess, I did leave the rear wheel nuts loose once on a Fiat 124 I had. This was in 1979 and I found out when the back wheel fell off as I tried to turn right on a very busy high street. The funny part was the ratlling sound for the previous 2-3 miles as each wheel nut fell into the steel hub cap they had back then.

 

I did also once not bother with the pollen filter as I forgot to buy it. I didn't tell myself about it so I didn't complain. :rolleyes:

 

I also dropped an 8mm socket down the side of the engine and wing once and couldn't get it out. So it stayed there. Does that count at all?

 

Trying to be reallly bad now!:-x:shock::D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must confess, I did leave the rear wheel nuts loose once on a Fiat 124 I had. This was in 1979 and I found out when the back wheel fell off as I tried to turn right on a very busy high street. The funny part was the ratlling sound for the previous 2-3 miles as each wheel nut fell into the steel hub cap they had back then.

 

I did also once not bother with the pollen filter as I forgot to buy it. I didn't tell myself about it so I didn't complain. :rolleyes:

 

I also dropped an 8mm socket down the side of the engine and wing once and couldn't get it out. So it stayed there. Does that count at all?

 

Trying to be reallly bad now!:-x:shock::D

 

Well Jimmy I think you have redeemed yourself with an A+ 3 star rating as a Fast fit fitter.

 

You got A+ because I think the 124 had bolts at that time, a star for forgetting to follow process and a star for dropping the socket. Plus trying to convince us you tried to replace the pollen filter but forgot

 

You could have got 5 stars but lost two :

1 star for admitting it and not blaming Donald Duck and the second for not coming up with a more imaginative excuse as to excuse liability, such as "our quality manager took it for a test drive over the reactor at Chenobyl and the nuts were ok then, the fact they changed into bolts and glow in the dark is not our responsibility".

 

So Jimmy, despite your confession, you need just a little bit more!!!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...