Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My ex blamed me for her not paying her bills she says I controlled her money. So I have been told I need to pay them as it was my fault. She has not paid the bills where she lives now which was my house. I'm not allowed contact with her and again she is blaming me. As in this type of case it is victim led so no matter what stupid thing she says she is believed. It is for me to prove otherwise.
    • No SAR yet but they have confirmed via email that they have everything and will supply it by this month end.    When you say the FOS considered it a personal loan due to personal guarantee who is the FOS? Financial Ombudsman?  But then that doesn’t make sense as they haven’t been involved yet.    Santander in their final response to my original complaint did not agree to it. They turned my complaint down and specified that the selling dealership had agreed to treat it as personal for settlement purposes.    I guess they could not agree to it as then they would be guilty of miss selling but they gave me what I wanted by saying I would not get treated as a business customer in regards to finance charges.    Awful bank to deal with. Will never touch them again. 
    • Background I am in dispute with Clerical Medical over, amongst other things, statements that I haven't received. They didn't resolve my complaint in time so invited me to complain to the FOS, which I did The FOS investigator in his findings has written that  Clerical Medical have mow provided all missing statements apart from two. One of these is for the policy year 2021 - 2022, which they say is unavailable due to a system migration. I have twice asked the FOS investigator for a copy of his screen shot to try and resolve this discrepancy but they have ignored me so today I submitted a subject access request. I said I was primarily interested in the screen shot but I also asked for everything they held against the complaint reference number. The response I got from firstly the Data Protection Operations Senior Coordinator, then secondly the investigator was that  The investigator expanded on this and said I'll wait the 40 days and see what they come back with then make a decision on next steps at that point, but I want to make sure I've got my facts in the right order before I start arguing with them. They seem to be saying that my SAR doesn't cover the screen shot because it isn't personal data but I disagree. I have a reference number that identifies my complaint and therefore indirectly identifies me. I think that means everything that is held against that reference number, including the screen shot, is my personal data and is in scope of my SAR (subject to exemptions). Who is right?
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • You sure it's a Section 48 notice? Section 48 notice is just telling you who your landlord is. Have they sold and they're just telling you who your new landlord is or is it an actual eviction notice? Might be best scanning it up just in case here.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

cl finance vs me - case struck out - what next please?


gwa70
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5220 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

the judge issued order for them to comply by 27th and this daye having passed i was advised by clerk that case is automatically struck out as per judges order.......she then added case was dead unless claimant provided cca etc in the future....................now surely a struck out claim is dead in the water and a new claim would have to be filed if they wanted to go at me again??

with this in mind what is my next move...........court said i wouldn,t receive anything in writing to confirm struck out status but can assume it is as claimant hasn,t complied.................i want to act now if i can to drive nail into claimants coffin so they go away and don,t dream of coming back................any advice please

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter from the court telling me the case was struck out and they gave them 7 days to respond (this was with Link), I called the court after the 7 days and was told they had not responded - end of story one would hope that was back in early 2009.

Not a peep from them except for a statement at the end of 2009.

DG

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was the clerks comment that i would hear nothing unless the claimant wrote to the court or sent in the docs they needed that sent alarm bells ringing...........she wasn,t able to confirm that the claim was dead so got me thinking that maybe i should be pro active and make some sort of move to leave nothing to chance...........court advice seemed a bit vague thats all..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the judge ruled 27th for response and they've not done it - should be end of story as far as I know, if I'm wrong someone will let us know.

 

DG:)

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with CL is you shouldn't expect anything. Personally I would want something in writing, confirming that the case has been struck out, & CL can't just reinstate the claim when it suits them.

Also, as they have failed to enforce judgement, don't be surprised if they pass it back to the origonal creditor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so do i write to the court asking for confirmation.........what would i say...........on the subject of original creditior if cl can,t provide original cca etc then the chances of original being avble to is by default nil or surely they would have by now............its been going on for nearly a year.........assuming cl back off then is there an avenue for trying to get original creditor to write the debt off as legally they have no leg to stand on....anyone had any luck going down this route

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the court clerk is confusing 'struck out' with 'stayed'. What did the judge's order say? If it said the claim would be 'struck out' for non-compliance with the order, then write to the court requesting that the case be properly struck out. You want it in writing. If the judge had made an order, then you shouldn't need to file an N244.

 

Otherwise it may come back to bite you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

judges order said it would be struck out by 27th if no reply received.............clerk said no reply so judges order would automatically come into force........i said would i receive a letter and she said no as the order was clear..................if i am to write tot he court again what is best way to word it.........a simple " in light of the non response to your order dated xxxx could the court please confirm in woritng that this claim is now struck out"................would this do???

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

When CL failed to enforce judgement against me, they passed it back to Santander without giving them any background whatsoever. They had no knowledge that a claim had been filed, & had gone to court.

 

How can they pass it back when they supposedly bought it? Was it sale or return? :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, this has been my first response to Santander. I have told them that I am not prepared to discuss any background to this account. As far as I'm concerned CL still "Absolutely" own this debt.

 

Quite right! Unless the assignment wasn't what it seemed and someone has been telling fibs...

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok i,m a bit confused.....if cl pass it back or to someone else we are likely to go throught the same carry on...........if they can,t provided the CCA etc then surely after 18 months noone will and therefore noone is goong to have a legal leg to stand on...............so what next...just wait for 6 years etc and go for statue barred??.....................

 

i,ve had various people chase me for other credit card debts and every one has backed off after cca request............they all say the debt has been passed back to the original creditor.............i,ve heard nothing from anyone since so do i just sit and do nothing or is there anything i can do with original creditor ...ie attempt to get them to write it off etc..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...