Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite usual for couriers to swap parcel contents, though it could have been done by someone at the 1st address before it got to where it should have .... ebay. just to clarify as you seem to be not understanding/reading some posts correctly.   you should always ignore a dca totally unless you ever get a letter of claim in the post. you never ever ring a DCA.. they LIE. no!! no!! they dont own the debt, their txt says our client ebay. only the OWNER of a debt can take you to court. and ebay dont do court. i find it quite amazing that you have numerous threads about ebay/paypal regarding issues since you joined in 2011 but have never read any of the advice previously given. dx    
    • so where are the one with this HMTL link? and when were they sent.? pdf's merged and properly named. dx  
    • Hi Just had a wee look at your PDF and nothing really to add. Now as for the Court Fees if these are in there Claim then that is for the Judge to decide whether they accept the recovery of Court Fees in the Claim. If recovery of Court Fees are not in the Claim and they try to recover these via your deposit then you dispute this with the Tenancy deposit scheme your deposit is protected in and point out these costs should have been in there Court Claim which they failed to do and is there error.  
    • The postcode is an important point. You cannot be in two postcodes at the same time and the contract only covers the F area and not the E area where Met placed your car. See there is some   advantages in with idiots.🙂 The other fact about the electric spaces is that as you are not allowed to park there, the sign is prohibitory so cannot  offer a contract anyway. and another biggie in your favour is you were not the driver and the PCN does not comply with PoFA. I had another look yesterday at the PCN and there is another error since it does not say that the driver is responsible to pay the charge during the first 28 days. Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][b] (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; so that is another nail in their coffin and it s something I would include in  your WS since that is one that every Judge would accept as a failure to comply. As far as their WS is concerned some of them leave it to the last minute to prevent Defendants being able to counteract their claims. However if they leave it too late [ie after the stipulated time] you can email yours to the Court on the last day and complain at the bottom of your WS that you have not received it and therefore you are asking the Court not to accept their WS. In your case it isn't that important since you have a virtual walkover in Court. I would be surprised if they don't concede beforehand. It is a lost cause for them. Not that I would advocate parking in their electric bay in future with a petrol driven car again.🙂
    • I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bailiff car clamped for parking ticket


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5226 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got two parking tickets for parking at my old address which was permits only. mine had been sent off for and paid for but hadnt arrived. council told me to put note in windscreen explaining which i did. still was given tickets, council told me they would be appealed as id spoke to them and lived at that address.

 

didnt hear anything else, until this week when my car was clamped. i phoned the number and was told i had to pay £392 in half an hour or my car would be taken and sold. i paid him over the phone. when he arrived he said hed be charging another £342 later on that day. i said i didnt have the money. but he used my account details and took it anyway. i did not get a recept for the money he took.

 

i had had no prior letters or visits from anyone about this.

 

I am a one parent family and work 20 hours looking after elderly people. i get housing benefit and working /child tax credits. i couldnt get to work that day or my son to school. and if my car had been taken would have had to give up my job and take my son out of school. i only had the money in my account saved to buy furniture for our new flat and pay the rent and food which we cant do now.

 

could anyone give any advice on if i have any rights here. thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got two parking tickets for parking at my old address which was permits only. mine had been sent off for and paid for but hadnt arrived. council told me to put note in windscreen explaining which i did. still was given tickets, council told me they would be appealed as id spoke to them and lived at that address.

 

didnt hear anything else, until this week when my car was clamped. i phoned the number and was told i had to pay £392 in half an hour or my car would be taken and sold. i paid him over the phone. when he arrived he said hed be charging another £342 later on that day. i said i didnt have the money. but he used my account details and took it anyway. i did not get a recept for the money he took.

 

i had had no prior letters or visits from anyone about this.

 

I am a one parent family and work 20 hours looking after elderly people. i get housing benefit and working /child tax credits. i couldnt get to work that day or my son to school. and if my car had been taken would have had to give up my job and take my son out of school. i only had the money in my account saved to buy furniture for our new flat and pay the rent and food which we cant do now.

 

could anyone give any advice on if i have any rights here. thank you.

 

There are so many things wrong here that it is difficult where to start.

 

Can you tell me which bailiff company this was?

 

The bailiff is certainly in trouble on this one. CLEARLY, he was aware of 2 warrants for unpaid PCN's and enforced one early in the day and intended on returning later the SAME DAY for the second PCN. A Bailiff cannot do this and he knows it. They MUST enforce at the same time as otherwise, he is attempting to apply "multiple charges" .

 

Because of the manner in which this has been enforced, it is certainly possible to contact your credit card provider to make a claim for the charge to be reversed. You will need to speak to your card provider for this.

 

Can you let me also know which local authority this was?

 

If the local authority will not cancel these PCN's, then you need to immediately file two Out of Time Applications with the Traffic Enforcement Centre. If you send me a PM, I can provide a template for you. You will need to have the PCN numbers to hand.

 

Did the bailiff provide a Notice of Seizure of Goods & Inventory? This is a legal requirement if a vehicle has been clamped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI thanks so much for your reply. all this mess has really made me feel ill. the bailiff company was Equita, and the local authority is colchester borough council.

i will contact my bank to see if they will do this. i have spoken to the council and they said they did not give me that information about putting a note in my windscreen or getting them appealed as that is incorrect info. i wouldnt make something like that up though but i suppose its my word against theirs.

I have just requested the pcn numbers from council as i dont know them. and have asked for a out of time application from the traffic centre.

they didnt issue a notice of seizure inventory.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI thanks so much for your reply. all this mess has really made me feel ill. the bailiff company was Equita, and the local authority is colchester borough council.

i will contact my bank to see if they will do this. i have spoken to the council and they said they did not give me that information about putting a note in my windscreen or getting them appealed as that is incorrect info. i wouldnt make something like that up though but i suppose its my word against theirs.

I have just requested the pcn numbers from council as i dont know them. and have asked for a out of time application from the traffic centre.

they didnt issue a notice of seizure inventory.

 

If you want help in completing the form, please do let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you again!!

 

I did copy and paste part of your previous message to the council, and i think they actually started taking me seriously and replying to me. rather than saying "computer says we cant help you".

 

They have just told the bailiff morons to pay me back £300!! am well pleased!

 

Am still complaining about them though to the bailiff regulator people and the local government ombudsman.

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you again!!

 

I did copy and paste part of your previous message to the council, and i think they actually started taking me seriously and replying to me. rather than saying "computer says we cant help you".

 

They have just told the bailiff morons to pay me back £300!! am well pleased!

 

Am still complaining about them though to the bailiff regulator people and the local government ombudsman.

 

xx

 

 

WOW.....so there is ONE local authority who have an ounce of common sense. WELL DONE Colchester Council.

 

Your complaint however..would not have been a ONE OFF...and for this reason tyou need to ensure that you make a Formal Complaint to the Chief Executive concerning the charging by THEIR appointed bailiffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did he take money from your account without your permission? how did he know your bank details?

 

:-o

 

I get the impression this was a credit card transaction. Having given the bailiff the card details in the morning for the first PCN, they reused the card details again on the afternoon without the cardholder's permission to process the second PCN. They had all the details the needed from the first phone call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh yes i see now thanks. That reminds me of a time when I used a debit card to pay a car finance payment for my sister when she was broke. The company continued to take payments from my card when she defaulted even though I called them to stop doing it. They said they had the right to do it because I gave them my card details and the bank agreed! The solution was to cancel my card.

 

The more stories I hear and situations experienced, it seems that there is a system of opression that goes further than just the banks and bailiffs etc. The tree of darkness has roots, you know what i mean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...