Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
    • Thank you - Defence has now been filed Doc_20240501_182920_Redacted.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome contract unenforceable??


ims
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5049 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi i am currently having problems with wf and read somewhere that the loan on my car is unenforceable if they charged interest on the exceptance fee or something like that, details of the agreement are as follows:

cash price of goods = 6500.00 (m)

deposit cash = 1000.00 (p)

acceptance fee = 195.00 (s)

finance charges for goods = 2391.68 (t)

option fee = 100.00 (u)

charge for credit for goods = 2686.68 (s+t+u) = (w)

total charge for credit = 2686.68 (x)

 

rate of interest 14%

 

Have they charged me interest on the acceptance fee and option fee as i think and have they made the agreement unenforceable???

please help all help appreciated thanks

 

could someone also help with the letter to send them requesting all monies paid to be refunded :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

just uploaded to photobucket, how do i let you see them, cos it hasnt given me a url just my log in thing

 

 

There should be the word share above or below the document you uploaded go there and use the code starting just paste that code into a new message here

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets try and decode this welcome piece of crap

 

welcome agreements by design are to confuse

 

amout of credit £5500

interest will be £2649.46 not £2391.68 acording to welcome

the total amount payable will be £8149.46

 

next we need to add on acceptance fee/option fee and interest to give a total of £3239.46 add the amount of credit £5500 gives a grand total of £8739.46

so where does this total amount payable on the agreement of £9186.68 come from

 

well take off a grand for deposit, makes no difference as the total amount payable has been misstated

 

the figures are out by £447.22

 

lets work out the monthly payment

 

£8739.46 by 36 months gives a monthly figure of £242.76 not £224.63

 

 

thats why welcome will allways say your agreement is never finished

 

have you got a document called statement of price

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just wrote this letter can anyone check it prior to me sending it out?

 

To Whom it May Concern,

I write to inform you that following a visit to the citizens advice, and a legal representative, I have found that your Hire Purchase agreement is in breach of the consumer credit act 1974. due to the following:

Your agreement states:

cash price of goods = 6500.00 (m)

deposit cash = 1000.00 (p)

acceptance fee = 195.00 (s)

finance charges for goods = 2391.68 (t)

option fee = 100.00 (u)

charge for credit for goods = 2686.68 (s+t+u) = (w)

total charge for credit = 2686.68 (x)

total payable = 9186.68 (f)

rate of interest 14%

However the correct figures are as follows:

amount of credit £5500

interest will be £2649.46 not £2391.68 according to welcome

the total amount payable will be £8149.46

 

next we need to add on acceptance fee/option fee and interest to give a total of £3239.46 add the amount of credit £5500 gives a grand total of £8739.46

so where does this total amount payable on the agreement of £9186.68 come from

 

well take off a grand for deposit, makes no difference as the total amount payable has been misstated

 

the figures are out by £447.22

 

lets work out the monthly payment

 

£8739.46 by 36 months gives a monthly figure of £242.76 not £224.63

 

 

Due to the above I now inform you that your Hire purchase contract is unenforceable, also the default notice attached to the above account is therefore illegal, and that both of the above contradicts the consumer credit act. I now without prejudice request that all the monies paid to you on the above account have become due upon to me and must be returned to me in full, I also request the deposit paid in full and the removal of the data added to my credit file. I also need address details as to where the vehicle in question needs to be returned.

I believe I do not need to inform you that should my request not be adhered to I am legally entitled to return of all monies paid on this account plus associated court costs and legal fees along with 8% interest as standard.

I also give you 7 days to rectify the above, failure to do so will incur a £10 a day storage charge on the vehicle, which I will store for the time equal to the amount of the trade value of the car, which is currently £2700.00, at which time I will sell the vehicle to cover costs and will pursue the remaining debt through the courts.

As the account is now in legal dispute I must inform you that no further money will be paid by us,nor can you legally request any, and no further charges can be added to this account. Due to a harassment of phone calls from your company I feel obliged to inform you that all further contact must now be made via letter, the return address is that which you use for normal correspondence and that has never come in question before so I assume that this request will be forthcoming.

 

 

 

Yours Sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

i like your thinking on this but i had better do the letter

you will not be able to reclaim payments as the agreement is only unenforceable

 

but you get to keep the car as its classed as a gift

 

never mention a defective default notice

only pull that rabitt out the hat if a court claim has been issued

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi post, any how here goes, sent a letter before action to welcome finance, and they replied with the following letter:

 

Dear Sirs,

xxxxxxxxxx

 

FINAL RESPONSE

 

The purpose of this letter is to explain the results of my investigation into your complaint. I am pleased to advise that following my investigation i have concluded that the complaint is justified and i therefore upheld the complaint. What follows is my explination of why i have upheld the complaint and what i propose to do about it.

 

I am sorry that you have had to make this complaint. At welcome financial services we take complaints very seriously and will do our best to resolve any problems as quickly as possible.

 

My understanding of the complaint is:

+ you feel that the agreement is incorrect and therfore unenforceable.

 

If i have misunderstood the complaint, or any aspects of it, please contact me using the details in this letter.

 

I have investigated the complaint by:-

+ reviewing your signed agreement relating to this complaint

 

My findings are

+ the agreement is correct and therefore welcome finance does not acknowledge you claim that it is unenforceable. please find a copy of this agreement enclosed.

 

My conclusion is as follows

 

+ the amount of £6500 for the cash price of the goods is correct (car was actually £6495) the amount of credit is £5500 due to the £1000 cash deposit paid.

+the amount of £9186.58 for the total amount payable is correct. the figure includes both the deposit and the £100 option fee, neither of which were included in the loan. take this £1100 from the figure, and you are left with the £8086.68 which was dispursed for the loan.

+the contractual payments of £224.63, multiplied by the 36 month period is equal to the amount £8086.68.

 

Correct me if im wrong Postgg, but didnt he say in his letter i had my claim was justified but then contradicted what he said by backing the company??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...