Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Success Against First Plus


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5242 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I came on this site just a year ago in a dreadul state of stress having uncovered the truth about our PPI.

 

I just wanted to let you all know that following my referral of the case to the Ombudsman FP agreed to settle and put me back in the position had I not taken the PPI. They have today sent me a cheque for the PPI payments made and a cheque for the 8% interest on said payments. They have also credited the loan with the PPI amount taken and also the interest paid on this.

 

Over the last year I have also claimed back two lots of credit card charges against MBNA, have a claim in against Egg card for PPI and another PPI for FP but through Freedom Finance. My eyes have truly been opened to the sneakiness of these companies and also my gullability.

 

All these claims and successes have stemmed from the encouragement and reassurances given in those early days not only on this site but also MSE and FP Complaints. I truly was at my wits end and have suffered a deep depression over the last 12 months due to the stress.

 

I just wanted to say thank you to those who responded to me for their time and the encouragement and reassurance given, it really did mean a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh eck - I'm back already with a question!

 

Letter dated 21st December came yesterday. Says to confirm ppi now cancelled, full breakdown of refund and cheques.

 

Today letter arrives saying date of amended payment for loan only starts 1.2.10.

 

In the meantime on 4.1.10 my monthly payment was taken including the PPI part... I have called them this morning to get it back but they say it's right as new payment doesn't take effect until 1.02.10.

 

Am I right or are they?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh eck - I'm back already with a question!

 

Letter dated 21st December came yesterday. Says to confirm ppi now cancelled, full breakdown of refund and cheques.

 

Today letter arrives saying date of amended payment for loan only starts 1.2.10.

 

In the meantime on 4.1.10 my monthly payment was taken including the PPI part... I have called them this morning to get it back but they say it's right as new payment doesn't take effect until 1.02.10.

 

Am I right or are they?

 

Thanks

 

Fight it tell them this is unfair and you will submit another complaint to the FOS unless they re-adjust the ppi for January.

 

Tell them that you are serious about this having had a FOS adjudication and the PPI cancelled.

 

Point out that a further complaint will result in a further £500 fee to the Ombudsman :D

 

Then sit back and see what they say ;)

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you for your help. Does this sound ok?

 

Further to my telephone conversation with one of your Staff today, I write to confirm the following.

 

Following my complaint to the FSO, I am in receipt of your letter dated 21/12/09 which gives me a breakdown of the full refund of the PPI and interest on the above account and also confirms the cancellation of the PPI. The refunds were made by cheque and included with this letter.

 

I am also in receipt of your letter dated 04/01/2010 advising me that the refunds have now been completed and of the new loan payment amount with effect from 1/2/10.

 

However, on the 4/1/10 you took the monthly direct debit for my loan payment as normal but you took the PPI payment amount as well. I believe that you should not have taken this PPI payment as you had already cancelled the PPI policy on 21/12/09 and refunded me in full.

 

 

I would like a full refund of this PPI payment taken on 4/1/10. If I do not receive a full refund within 14 days, I shall have no hesitation in filing another complaint with Ombudsman which I believe will result in another £500 fee to yourselves.

I look forward to your early settlement of this matter.

 

Thanks in advance, RKM

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...