Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Greenwoods and Provident personal credit inside info


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5102 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i wish to remain annonimous

i am just posting this to warn you all or the current operating proceedures by this company, if you dont know already but Provi and Greenwoods are the same company, i am a regular poster on her so am doing this on the quiet, i will only post this an the return to my usual id. they both operate out of the same office

 

Provident and Greenwoods are currently going after old debts, older than 6 yrs, some are 10+ years, this is unlawful and up to now is not going along with it, what they are doing is simply renewing the paperwork calling it a fresh start loan agreement, where the customer doesnt actually get any money just a rehash of the old loan, but if the customer agrees they owe the money and after so long in a panic they sign papers agreeing to the fresh start, but here's the catch, if you owe provi, they send a greenwoods agent to collect stating they have been passed the debt to collect and viceversa, thus using an in house debt collecting system.

so if you know you owe these companies money, just cos they dont call for years that dont mean they have forgotten.

 

if you owe these companies money and are struggling to pay, you have a few options, firsly talk to your agent, they will accept lower regular payments, just talk to them. if you cant even manage that and have not paid in weeks and are worried they are going to take you to court, dont worry! they will only take you to court after 20 weeks of none payment, but even if you pay 1 payment after even 19 weeks, then they have to start the waiting game again, the 20 week period starts again. also, any paperwork you sign for these companies MUST MUST be done infront of the agent, otherwise the loan is unlawful and can be challenged, also take a look at the payment book, does it correspond to the agreement, sometimes the agent cocks up the percentages etc and that also that there are no mistakes on the paperwork as the agents are under a lot of pressure to sell loans, (thats what they call it, selling loans).

 

oh and they now impact on your credit file, until recently about 2 years ago they didnt bother with credit checks, they do now tho.

 

Why do people work as an agent for a company like this, well cos they pay well, very well indeed, which is part of the reason the interest rates are astronomical, dont get me wrong, while there are aspects of these companies that do annoy me, i believe there is a place in our society for them, if the government reigned in a tighter control on them then they would cease to exsist as every one gets a cut from your loan and they wouldnt be able to pay any one, eg, some one borrows 100 over 33 weeks, they pay back 163.00 ish, out of the 63 interest, the agent gets a cut, the agents manager gets a cut, the agents managers manager gets a cut, and believe me when i say that leaves about 10 profit for the company them selves, take them out of the equasion ( which would be financial suicide for the government) then what have you left, the banks wont lend to high risk customers, you are left with the loan sharks etc, who would you rather lend off, what also companies like thes have going for them, if if you borrow money and miss a payment, there is no penalties unlike a banks high rates, the agent will just smile and arrange to call the next week.

also if you have an agent who is nasty or rude, remember that they have a manager and if that agent is a bad one that impacts the percentage the agents manager gets, which he wont be happy about.

any way i just thought i would give some inside info incase you need it, if this helps you then great, if not please dont pm me as i wont respond. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

hi i was searching today for some info on greenwoods and came across your post, thank you so much, i have been having huge trouble with my local branch, long story but have sent them several letters all by recorded, one via the agent several months ago, and a complaint to head office and emailed the head office and i still have not had ONE reply, get the standard letters sent to me but nothing in reply to my letters, i even hand delivered one a few weeks ago with a cheque inside, which has not been cashed, after having read your post re the twenty week before court action, i believe that is why they have not cashed the cheque!! its been 17 weeks since my last payment!! so im going to use the barcoded letter to pay at a paypoint tomorrow!! and have resent the hand delivered letter by recorded delivery, just wanted to say thanks as that 20 week rule you put may just have saved us from going to court!! thank you so much, we are really struggling at the moment, i have a serious illness and husband was made redundant in January and they still wont reply to my letters asking for help, they will get £5 every so often!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very disturbing.

Of course many are aware that Provident and Greenwood are one and the same.

Thanks for heads up on this.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very disturbing.

Of course many are aware that Provident and Greenwood are one and the same.

Thanks for heads up on this.

it def is disturbing, we have quite a few debts and with help from this website and payplan have agreed repayment plans with all but greenwoods, yes they are the same, in our area greenwoods and provident share the same postal address, cannot believe that they will not reply to any of our letters, does anyone have their sort code and account number as i have asked on each letter to pay by standing order but no reply, do not want the agent to call so not sure apart from paypoint how else to pay them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will move the thread into "Other Institutions"-this is the forum for Greenwood and Provident issues-so will likely be of interest to others there.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...