Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles.
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bank Charges - Any News


lovejoy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5247 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm still awaiting information myself following a query after receiving notification that the OFT are to take it on rather than all of us peeps individually.

 

Still awaiting confirmation but all in it makes sense if the OFT carries on but with the input from all consumer groups such as CAG, L seagulls, MSE etc etc

 

Stay tuned as I feel this week it will all be made clearer.

srfrench :eek:

 

Fight incompetance, stupidity, greed and unfairness......There's no excuse and no place for it in society, unless they really are! :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lovejoy,

Have you started a claim through the courts?

Do you have a claim stayed?

Check the instructions of your stay, is there a date for further instructions to be made?

 

Follow this thread for further discussion.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/oft-test-case-updates/139905-h-o-l-test.html

 

and this

Bank Charges Reclaiming: Fight unfair charges, updated after Supreme Court ruling...

 

Everyone is working very hard on this.

Still waiting for update from the OFT.

 

Good luck

Keep up the fight against Bank Charges.

 

 

Got Debt problems?

Don't panic, put the kettle on and read this

 

:-) Everything I write comes from my heart and head! The large filling cabinet that is my knowledge of life, however warped that may be!! :-)

 

<<< Please tickle my star!! if I have managed to help you or just made you chuckle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep checking in, as every one will know as soon as they are ready ;)

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm still awaiting information myself following a query after receiving notification that the OFT are to take it on rather than all of us peeps individually.

 

Still awaiting confirmation but all in it makes sense if the OFT carries on but with the input from all consumer groups such as CAG, L seagulls, MSE etc etc

 

Stay tuned as I feel this week it will all be made clearer.

 

Personally I think if OFT had just stayed out of the unfair charges cases altogether we would probably have all been paid out by the Banks already as there would have been no stay on cases being heard (or settled out of court as they all were up until then) - and the new "fairer" terms brought in by LloydsTSB/HBOS and RBS would have come in much earlier. I think we should all get new claims in ASAP as soon as a template is ready - and possibly get a small claims action heard (or settled out of court) ahead of more interference from OFT.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is some news on moneysavingexpert, apparently they are holding off releasing the templates, in the hope that the OFT will take up the case.

 

A triumph of hope over experience! Why do they think the OFT will do any better next time? The banks were on the ropes and they let them off in the Supreme Court by not getting a wider range of issues considered - which could not have been appealed further - there and then.

 

Look at how many barristers - and QC's - the banks fielded compared to OFT!

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

A triumph of hope over experience! Why do they think the OFT will do any better next time? The banks were on the ropes and they let them off in the Supreme Court by not getting a wider range of issues considered - which could not have been appealed further - there and then.

 

Look at how many barristers - and QC's - the banks fielded compared to OFT!

 

BD

 

The OFT have been dealing with consumer groups including MSE, LB and PC and no doubt, if CAG can sort out their conference call with the OFT, they can put their views forward. Each site have given their views on various different legal approaches that could be used and so most groups agree on the OFT taking the case forward.

The banks fielded lots of QC's and the OFT fielded 2 in the whole case. The OFT won twice and the bank won the third one but not entirely a convincing win.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lovejoy,

Have you started a claim through the courts?

Do you have a claim stayed?

Check the instructions of your stay, is there a date for further instructions to be made?

 

Follow this thread for further discussion.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/oft-test-case-updates/139905-h-o-l-test.html

 

and this

Bank Charges Reclaiming: Fight unfair charges, updated after Supreme Court ruling...

 

Everyone is working very hard on this.

Still waiting for update from the OFT.

 

Good luck

 

Sorted mine out a couple of years ago, but was just about to start a new one against Barclays for my wife.

 

Personally I'm not exactly thrilled at the news that the OFT may be getting involved again.

I would much rather do it myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a deadline of today to contact the bank with regards my overdraft.

Should I ask them to consolidate my overdrafts and arrange a repayment plan on this untill such time that my charges are refunded or refused.

 

Overdraft £3.8K

Bank Charges £7.5K

 

I don't want all the DCA letters again.

 

I will reclaim them with the new process but just want to stave off the vultures. :sad:

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

GL

 

Provided you are not signing any waiver over the legality of the charges stolen from you I don't think you have anything to lose - just make sure your repayments are affordable so you don't default on them and they call inthe whole loan. Are they looking to secure it on your house? If so be careful - although you might be able to claim undue duress later if you get into any repayment problems.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

They sent £1600 on one account to Wescot, then the rest they offered me 40% off if I pay by the 15th.

 

See my DCA thread.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/236617-wescott.html

 

 

I just want to keep the OD debt away from DCA's.:confused:

No securing on the house, that 40% offer letter was the first they have spoke to me since the FOS got involved and agreed to wait untill the Supreme court decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprising conversation last night.

 

Called the bank, or Blair, Oliver and Scott as it turned out to be. I spoke to the adviser there and explained that I had sent a letter to Wescot informing them not to contact me and return the account to the Bank of Scotland as it was still under dispute. I also informed her that I had sent in a letter asking for both accounts to be consolidated and an offer to repay £50 a month had been made but not responded to.

 

She advised me that since I had went through to the FOS and raised a complaint that both accounts were on hold and there would be no interest or charges incurred on these accounts. She also said that the department was taking around 2 weeks to respond to letters and that there would probably be no action on either account till the new year.

I explained that I would be waiting till the OFT decide to act or not and see where to take it from there. She was extremely helpfull and in no way threatening, she even shared the joke when I suggested that due to her helpfullness she DID deserve her bonus this year.

 

Gives me some respite over Christmas and hopefully we will see some action by the OFT. I will not hold my breath though.

 

I hope anyone who is feeling threatened or under more pressure at this time can have the same relief. I'm not suggesting it's over now, and I expect more of a fight once the new claim hits their in-tray, only that the amount of pressure that has been lifted at this time of the year was well worth the phone call. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

GL

 

Glad it went well. Anyone else notice how Blame Orrible Swots have the same initials as BOS? Are they actually a solicitor firm or just in-house heavies?

 

BD

 

 

In house heavies. The lady even said the debt being chased by Wescot was still with the Bank of Scotland, Wescot were only chasing on a third party basis.

 

It's not over, but the pressure has eased for now. Thanks for everyones help by the way, it's greatly appreciated. At times you get grief from the DCA, grief from the Bank, grief from your other half. It's good to know there are people who know the system and are willing to help. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had read the MSE update before looking in CAG today. Personally I am inclined to agree with bigdebtor, and feel that rather than let the OFT make a mess of things again it would be better if we all individually submitted claims to the courts. OK the banks may be able to field the odd barrister up against a small percentage of claimants, who may struggle to win the argument in such circumstances, but I feel a very high proportion of us would get our charges back.

 

I think the caveat here is as long as the claim is under £5,000 and hence in the Small Claims track, which means the individual wouldn't be liable for the banks costs if they lost? Is this correct, perhaps someone can confirm that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

IainHL

 

I think you're right in all respects. I find it very frustrating that we can't get a new template from CAG or MSE and swamp the Banks with these then take the case to Small Claims if they dare to contest it.

 

I just missed out in getting my unfair charges back before the OFT's intervention in 2007 - and don't want the same to happen again.

 

I tried using FOS to get them back during the FSA stay - but they sided with the banks - "wait and see outcome of case" - and effectively said "not the Bank's fault if you starve in the meantime!"

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a letter from the FOS today telling me that the OFT had lost the case and they were unable to take my complaint any further, so I won't be getting my charges back. So, can I now go to court, or has the fact the ombudsman has made a decision on my account mean that I can't take any further action?

Bank of Scotland account 1 - £2,666 WON

Bank of Scotland account 2 - £2,500 on hold

GE Capital charges -£30 won (hey, every little helps!)

Barclays Partner Finance £425 charges - £225 offer accepted.

 

Finally debt free after 4.5 years, thanks to my Debt Management Plan through Payplan. There is no better feeling :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The FOS are as much use as a chocolate teapot.

They are more concerned with getting the complaint off their records and were unwilling to challenge the banks.

 

They even sent me a 'cut and paste' letter regarding a different bank :rolleyes:

 

Technically they may be unable to progress your complaint, but I suspect it's just another template they have to clear out their in-tray.

 

The swiftest response I got from the FOS was when I highlighted their pathetic cut and paste reply and suggested that the procedures were inadequate and I would like my complaint to be addressed as an individual matter rather than as part of a mailing list.

 

Many personal phone calls and emails directly from an adviser ensued. They never done anything else about it, but at least someone had a look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a letter from the FOS today telling me that the OFT had lost the case and they were unable to take my complaint any further, so I won't be getting my charges back. So, can I now go to court, or has the fact the ombudsman has made a decision on my account mean that I can't take any further action?

 

Suzie

 

Can you post up the letter? I think they may have misled you - and that is worth a complaint (to your MP?) in itself. To summarise the very long judgement in a few words is at best irresponsible - if not downright devious.

 

The head judge actually said he was not saying the bank charges were fair - just the OFT had screwed up by arguing on such a narrow point of law - albeit out-manoevered into doing that by the Bank's milionaire QC's.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will post it up when my son shows me how :rolleyes:. The FOS got back my charges from one account (pretty hassle free I have to say) before the waiver. I know they are talking a load of bowlarks.:mad: I'm quite prepared to take it to court but I'm sure I read somewhere that either:

*If you've lost in court then you can't go to the ombudsman OR

*If the ombudsman has ruled against you the you can't go to court.

Only trouble is I can't remember which one is the right one, but hoping it is the first one as I ain't writing off two and a half grand without a fight. :D

Bank of Scotland account 1 - £2,666 WON

Bank of Scotland account 2 - £2,500 on hold

GE Capital charges -£30 won (hey, every little helps!)

Barclays Partner Finance £425 charges - £225 offer accepted.

 

Finally debt free after 4.5 years, thanks to my Debt Management Plan through Payplan. There is no better feeling :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure it's the former Suze. The FOS isn't a legal body, therefore ANY decision they rule on isn't enforceable in Law. Only a Court can do that....;)

srfrench :eek:

 

Fight incompetance, stupidity, greed and unfairness......There's no excuse and no place for it in society, unless they really are! :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for that srfrench. I'll just bide ma time until we get a clearer idea of how to approach the court route. :)

Bank of Scotland account 1 - £2,666 WON

Bank of Scotland account 2 - £2,500 on hold

GE Capital charges -£30 won (hey, every little helps!)

Barclays Partner Finance £425 charges - £225 offer accepted.

 

Finally debt free after 4.5 years, thanks to my Debt Management Plan through Payplan. There is no better feeling :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...