Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Again please on Charging Order


jimbo45
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5206 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

It seems to be difficult to get ANY advice on charging orders -- I can't believe I'm the only one on this Forum who's got one of these.

 

I have a FINAL charging order on a house for a Credit Card debt. - I've managed to get the debt down to just under 7,000 GBP and can probably get it down to 5,000 GBP -- but I'm NOT currently working at the moment (FREE LANCE) and who knows when I will be working again.

 

The Solicitors (RESTONS - Miserable **** acting for HFC - a subsidiary of HSBC) just don't want to know and will push for a FORCED sale of the house.

 

HSBC (meant to be "Your Friendly Local Bank" just say it's not our problem even though they own 100% of HFC Bank)

 

As the charging order is FINAL I don't think there's much I can do about getting it "Set Aside" although if it's possible I would love to do it.

 

My 2 main problems here are

 

1) NOWHERE on the original CCA did it say that the CREDIT CARD agreement could be turned into a SECURED LOAN -- had it said that even on the small print then surely I can use "Mis-Selling" as I certainly would not have taken out the loan --it was sold to me most definitely as an UNSECURED LOAN. Seems one Law for Banks whilst another (or lack of one) for the poor consumer.

 

2) Can they really force a Sale of a House worth over 200,000 GBP with around only 9,000 GBP left on the mortgage for 5,000 GBP worth of Credit Card debt -- I think I would rather BURN the property down than give it to these scumbags --unlike a Mortgage where you know what will usually happen if you can't pay. The Mortgage luckily -- although small is being paid out from the maturity of an investment I made years ago which has matured - however I can't use that to pay off anything else other than continue the Mortgage which only has 14 months left to run.

 

I have NEVER SEEN on ANY CREDIT CARD agreement "Your Home is at risk if you can't keep up payments on any loans secured on it". -- Perhaps Credit Card agreements should come with the warning too.

 

Any help here -- I really can't get (or WANT) any more LOANS ever again so I don't care what equifax, experian etc hold on my "credit" file - but can 21st Century Britain really make you homeless because you've got a temporay problem with a Credit Card.

 

Would it be worth attempting to call the Lawyers bluff and explain the problem to a Court -- most lawyers try and avoid the court route wherever possible hoping to scare people into making impossible payments -- but it's not nice "playing Casino" with your house if you lose.

 

I wonder how some of these Lawyers - in particular RESTONS can even REACH their beds at night - never mind sleep in them.

 

Maybe time to call in "some favours"

 

I've posted this in this Forum since although not a Mortgage problem it is a possible Repossession action.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Edited by jimbo45
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jimbo, dont dispair;)

 

You are not the only person on these forums with a charging order, lets get you moved to the legal forums, theres lots of us over there!:D

 

Did you not receive any court paperwork, alerting you to the CCJ restons got?

The fact is they got a CCJ by default as you did not defend it, following that they apply for an interim charging order, when its still not defended, after x amount of time the interim charging order becomes final, thats how it turns into "secured" so to speak.

 

You still maybe able to sort this...more help should be arriving soon:)

 

mj:)

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Charging order has been made final then you'll need to apply to get it set aside. Please Can you post up the status.

 

Have a look at these link below for info -

 

CCJ removal inc. step by step guide

 

Did you defend the original claim ?

 

Did you oppose the Interim Charging Order ?

 

Also, read MJ's own thread for some extra info. help with CCJ/charge on home asap **STRUCK OUT**

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

The original CCJ and the Interim CO were pushed through the courts whilst I was away -- I did challenge Restons on this but they said "Letter posted legally" to your address --wasn't even Recorded delivery etc.

 

I was actually working in Belgium at the time -- with the current situation one has to go further and further to go and get work.

 

The CO was also made Final - because at the time I had NO MONEY left over to pay anything other than Mortgage.

 

I've got the debt down to a more manageable £7,000 and can probably pay a LITTLE more - but again I'm "between contracts" and won't be able to pay anything until a new contract turns up -- probably arounf February.

 

I've paid these B*****DS around £3,000 GBP in the last 6 months -- now I need a small "Payment Holiday"

 

-- I'm NOT trying to renegade on a Debt -- after all I DID have and use the Credit card but how is it you even get severely "S--T ON" when actually TRYING to pay a debt. Also I believe the 1600 GBP or so "Collection charge" is severely excessive and was added to the original CO.

 

I've also MANY times requested a proper statement from Restons -- typically something like

 

Original amount of debt ----XXXXX

Court costs -- xxxxxxx

Other charges xxxxxxxxx

Amount paid / date xxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxx

 

Amount outstanding XXXXXXXXXXX

 

Never get anything -- I've requested a statement - but just get the old "Threatogram" If we don't get your next payment within 7 days we will immediately go to court --NO FURTHER WARNING

 

I just feel like burning the whole property down and having done with it - I could probably go and live in Mexico or somewhere for a few dollars a year and forget all this stuff - but why should I let these people win when I'm actually TRYING to pay off the debt.

 

Reasonableness from Banks I know is probably like wishing to win the Lottery every week consecutevely FOR A YEAR but surely even these people must realize they are much more likely to recover their money by being REASONABLE and helpful -- most of us didn't cause the Recession - THEY DID and whilst they get humungous amounts of money we are being trodden on even more -- not unfortunately an argument a Judge is likely to sympathize with.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Edited by jimbo45
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok jimbo

 

if the ccj/co were pushed through the courts whilst you were away then those will be your grounds for a set aside along with anything else you can throw at um when you have all the paperwork you are about to ask for

 

What you need to do for starters is download a form N244 from your local court website, the fee for applying for a set aside at the court is £75 though:mad:.

 

you need to start by sending a CCA request to restons, (template in the letters section) and a SAR to the original creditor (who ever the credit card was with) send recorded delivery, with a £1.00 postal order for CCA and £10 for the SAR, keep proof of posting and copies of letters sent.

 

Hope this helps for now, im off to work but im sure someone else will be along soon.

 

Have a read of my thread, its a bit long, but will give you help as to what may lie ahead. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/167654-help-ccj-charge-home.html

 

There could be many factors that could make this a unenforcable debt, and by asking for the above will show you exactly what!

 

Good luck

 

MJ:D

  • Haha 1

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

Will Do -- I can use part of the Winter Fuel Allowance to pay the 75 Quid -- might as well use it since I'm probably going to not need "Winter Fuel" with all the Hot Air I'm probably going to receive from Restons etc.

 

Actually I don't even mind paying the debt back (won't tell the Court that of course) as I DID have the Credit card (Marbles / HFC) but I can only pay back a reasonable amount - and what's really got in my craw is the "Back-door" method an Unsecured Load can be converted into a Secured one without ANY STATEMENT OF THIS being on the original Credit agreement. (Plus of course the typical "Extortion Fee" for "Collection" and in general the totally unprofessional way in which Restons handle the case - especially their chief "Extortioner" - Mr K DELVES -- anybody else had dealings with this odious specimen :(

 

IF I even remotely suspected a House could be at risk on a normal "Unsecured Credit Card agreement" I would have not taken out the Card in the first place.

 

A Mortgage says quite clearly "Your HOME is at RISK if you don't keep up any payments secured on it" - but I've looked at Credit Card agreements until I'm blue in the face --NOWHERE is there any warning like this on them - so could Mis-Selling be used as well as part of the defence in that I was sold a product which missed a CRITICAL CONDITION being stated on the original agreement - which had it been there in the first place I most certainly would NOT have taken out the Card agreement.

 

Has anybody ever got anywhere with this type of defence -- the fact that I haven't seen it so far rather dashes my hope along these lines. Amazing isn't it that they advertise "Unsecured Loans" etc -- and then you find out years later after you've got into difficulty that these agreements weren't "Unsecured" at all

 

- Any Caggers reading this Please be CAREFUL with CREDIT CARDS This is a NASTY position to end up in --having to play Casino with your own home for what is really a fairly small amount of debt (at least by Bank's standards) is NOT a nice position to be in.

 

(If the worst comes to the worst I've heard also that the sale fee goes into the Court -- does that mean that the equity I've got in the House gets lost as well or do I at least get that back - House around 220,000 Mortgage outstanding only 9,000 and not in arrears).

 

Anyway its worth it to try to get a Set Aside -- I'll donate any money from this if I win to the board as this is one of the few places to get help from these a--h-les.

 

In any case it should delay any sale application and TIME is what I need at the moment -- I could be back working again by Feb / Mar. -- I can't wait for the day when I can FINALLY get these vermin off my back.

 

Thanks to all

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Echo...if you get a final charging order its payable on sale of your property, not in installments. The ccj has been defaulted thats when the co comes into play.

 

If they are being really mean they can apply for a forced sale of the property so they can then get their money, but this is hard to enforce i believe.

 

mj:)

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I'm having problems with a CO myself, and have done a bit of research on the subject. As far as I am aware CO only becomes payable on sale of property, and Judges are reluctant to force sale, so creditor will have to wait until you sell up. However, judging my experiences over the past few months, anything can happen in our wonderful "justice" system. I got taken to Court by RCI Financial Services, who obtained judgement for full amount claimed. Sent application for Variation of the order to Watford County Court on 16th September requesting order to pay an affordable monthly amount. On 1st October received details of Interim Charging order obtained by RCI, with full hearing scheduled for 26th January 2010. Sent in letter to Court outlining my objections to the granting of a Final order with copy to claimats solicitor. Continued to chase progress of my application for Variation of original order, and was finally advised by Court official that it was given to judge for determination on 16th December, some three months after it was sent to Court. I was told it would be dealt with at the hearing on 26th January. Attended hearing involving 150 mile round trip, only to find the judge hadn't been given my file!. Claimants solicitor supplied judge with copy of Interim order, (but not my objection previously sent to Court), and the Judge "rubber stamped" the Final Order. My husband asked judge if he could speak on my behalf, which the judge refused, as she said the hearing was only scheduled for five minutes.Still no news of my application for a Variation of the original order, which the Court have now had for over four and a half months. Sorry if I have hijacked your thread, but just had to get my frustration off my chest at our alleged "justice" system. I will be happy to share my experiences, but don't quite know which direction to take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...