Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Soph v Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6499 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well thought I would start a thread as i have a couple of questions... have looked through but can't find my precise answers i think... well maybe I need a little reassurance too!!

 

Anyway, have sent the Data Protection Act, Prelim and LBA - had standard letters blah blah initially but received a offer for £50 on bank account and £60 for credit card last week (which i am obviously not accepting) Am filing Moneyclaim today for almost £1000 (so exciting!!!) shall I still a thanks but no thanks letter for the charges? Now I have written it I guess I might as well!!!

 

However my second qu is the Moneyclaim interest thingy,

 

The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from {date when the money became owed to you} to {the date you are issuing the claim} of £ {put the amount} and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of {enter the daily rate of interest}.

are you supposed to put the total amount of your claim?

 

Also what is the daily rate of interest?

 

Thanks so much for any help in advance - am so so impressed with this site and shall be adding my donation WHEN i win!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, me again! Have worked out my above question I think and filed my moneyclaim.. interesting that all else has been ok but am now geting nervous!!

 

However, have been looking for a standard "thanks but no thanks letter" for their tiny little offer they gave me but can't locate it anywhere in the templates library... any clues? links etc would be much appreciated or else shall get composing!

 

Thanks again in advance, Soph

Link to post
Share on other sites

my last reply to them before i started claim went like this

 

Thank you for your letter dated 10 August 2006 offering a goodwill gesture payment of £546 I will accept this offer only as part payment and not as full and final settlement.

I am very disappointed that you have failed to respond positively to my letter of the 26 July 2006 LETTER BEFORE ACTION. As this deadline as now passed you have left me with no alternative but to begin a claim against you for the full amount off £1022 plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Righty ho, am sending a letter looking like this:

 

Thank you for your letters dated 9th and 10th August 2006 offering goodwill gesture payments of £60 and £50. I will accept this offer only as part payment and not as full and final settlement.

I am very disappointed that you have failed to respond positively to my letter before action on the 1st August 2006. As this deadline as now passed you have left me with no alternative but to begin a claim against you for the full amount of £604 plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law. I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

I calculate that you have taken £429 plus £47.65 that you have charged me in overdraft interest for the sum from my current account. I further calculate that you have taken £175 plus £174.99, which you have charged me in overdraft interest for the sum from my credit card account. Therefore, the total you have taken from me is £826.64. I am enclosing a copy of the schedule of the charges which I am claiming. I will also be adding the 8% APR to my claim.

I require repayment in full of this money.

Yours faithfully,

 

 

If anyone has any comments please feel free to pass them on - Thanks all!:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...