Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I would confirm that anyway, as there is a separate sheet where I have to put in those details and my insurance number and driving licence number. That is on page 2 (page one is their allegations) then page three is a statement that you weren't the driver and space to give details who was driving. Page 4 is an empty sheet for a statement to explain the situation. So I will fill out my details as the driver on page 2, admitting I was driving at the time, and then attach my statement as above as a separate sheet. That should hopefully do it at this stage
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Freemans Debt


mashmallow
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5119 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hopefully someone could advise me I am having difficulties paying my catalouge at the moment I have missed two payments and now they are asking for 222.00 to bring the account up to date, they have also slapped on 42.76 interest and default fee, can I refute these charges and just pay what I owe being a credit agreement. Also the catalouge is in the name of my partners surname not my orignal name, will this make a difference if I ask for my credit agreement its under Mrs //////// \I am a Ms.

 

Many thanks for your interest

 

 

Mashmallow

 

XXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest a nice letter first saying you're having difficulties and asking them if they could kindly not make it worse by adding interest and charges.

 

If they say no, then ask for the agreement.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I wrote to EOS 8th Jan asking for a true original copy of my credit agreement, just a standard letter not quoting any acts, they wrote back and said under the CCA 1974 does not comply with the requirements for such under the act and they are under no obligation to furnish me with the information. Is this correct please? can someone tell me.

 

Very much appreciated.

 

Regards,

 

Mashmallow

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to EOS 8th Jan asking for a true original copy of my credit agreement, just a standard letter not quoting any acts, they wrote back and said under the CCA 1974 does not comply with the requirements for such under the act and they are under no obligation to furnish me with the information. Is this correct please? can someone tell me.

 

Very much appreciated.

 

Regards,

 

Mashmallow

 

Can you post the letter up removing any details, its not clear from your post exactly what their reply was.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I offered reduced payments in Dec and paid them £30. I did'nt do an official CCA, just a request for a signed agreement.

 

Do I resend or can I resend using the proper template?

 

Please advise.

 

Thanks for your kind response

 

Mash

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your time, got a letter from them Friday offering a reduced amount owing they have taken £300 off the original amount and offered a payment plan? May be they have no credit agreement I will send a CCA off.

 

Thanks

 

 

Mash

 

XXXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they won't have a proper credit agreement, catalogues just don't work that way. Every time you order new goods on different terms, it's a different agreement and then there's the fact that goods are sent on approval, so effectively, they would have to send the goods, wait for the time for you to return them to pass, then send you a credit agreement for you to return, and do that every time you order new stuff! You can see what a logistical nightmare it would be, so instead they just send the goods on approval and rely on people paying up. ;-)

 

(could be different now with online ordering, I'm not sure, but certainly for goods ordered over the phone etc... No chance. ;-))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bookworm,

 

Thanks for that, shall I still send them a CCA i also have another catalouge that I am in trouble with, I will be out of work soon and will only be able to offer a token payment just a bot worried that they will take me to court?

 

Cheers

 

Mashmallow

 

XX

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, speaking for myself, I had a Kays and a Grattan, both of which I got into rows with due to them over-charging me, reneging on agreements, levying charges for no reason etc... Since they wouldn't budge, I thought "what the hell". I CCA'd Kays, who've passed it to NDR. NDR now write to me every month, add £24 of charges to the account and tell me I really should be paying them, oooh scary, lol, Grattan I haven't CCA'd, they have passed the debt to EOS who are now adding £150 of charge every month (!) and are also sending threateningletters warning me that they may take action any time soonish if I don't start behaving. I have a thread somewhere with the content of their letter if you're bothered to look for it, but it's the usual threatogram type of letter.

 

It's really up to you, I suppose for £1, a CCA request is useful to establish to them that you won't be a pushover. Plus it's always gratifying to see them writing back to say that "uh, no, they don't actually have a contract, but this is your balance, so pay up" and hope you fall for it. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bookworm,

 

Many thanks for your reply and your reassurance. Because it is a mail order what CCA do I use, apparently there is one for loans, credit cards etc. I don't want to look a fool and send the wrong one. Please can you guide me.

 

Many thanks

 

 

Mashmallow

 

XX

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Hi there

 

I have the same problem!! I am new to this site and would really value your help. Whats a CCA and where can I get a copy of the template?

 

A CCA is a request for the consumer credit agreement and can be found here; http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter If they cannot provide one or it's unenforceable they cannot take any enforcement action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

what annoys me with people like eos is that they assume a creditor is correct and eos then ignore letters sent to them from the debtor. I have a counter claim against the creditor ebay. So what I told the eos md ged is that on Monday I will be in court taken action against Lloyds bank so I can file my claim against EOS so for the few pounds the want from me I will make them pay 150%, I cannot loose. Only they loose, EOS, who I consider a pest and a parasite. I also notice that their md could be looking for a job as his cv is on the internet apparently touting for a job offer put ged schiels into a search engine and you will find his cv. why not offer him a pretend job?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...