Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All I know this a long shot but ha anyone got any advice please? Nearly three years ago (maybe more) my ex took a contract out for a new phone for my birthday that I ended up paying the bills on (lovely present huh) I have always paid the bill for this. The phone number that I have had for most of my adult life was passed over to this contract and I am old now haha We are now divorced and have not been in contact  - he is abusive and I have nothing to do with him. I cannot enter into any dialogue with him whatsoever. I have continued with my phone contract and number etc but am stuck - I have no access to my bills even though they come out of my account - as the contract is in his name I cannot get a pac code to move therefore I will lose my number if I cancel- sky just quote data protection at me which I get but this is soooo frustrating!!!! I know that the sensible thing would have been to just l cancel the dd lose the number get another contract elsewhere and get over myself and move on but I am just asking out there as a final desperate attempt - can anything whatsoever be done??? Thank you in advance :)
    • What's your intent, or interest? I can't see that you have any cause of action regarding bills issued by one third party to another third party. Is the idea to use this as a lever "I'll denounce you to HMRC unless you do blah blah .." That might in fact have no teeth anyway, HMRC will aware of the company's turnover via their other tax affairs.  As a matter of fact a company buying VAT rated supplies and selling to VAT registered customers is actually worse off if not VAT registered themselves. Has your court case reached it's conclusion yet?
    • Hello, welcome to CAG.  I expect people will be along to advise later. We aren't here to mock, this is a serious forum. If you feel you're being picked on  report the relevant post to the site team.  Best, HB
    • no that is not a defence. because you don't have a photo
    • I purchased the vehicle using finance through motonovo under a HP 60 months agreement. I have now amended the document ensuring all is in black. Unfortunately, this email has now been sent. However, I have not sent a letter to big motoring world. Also, I have taken the section of the firealarm issue. I am struggling to convert to PDF. I am not tech savy at all. My mistake was that the the salesman was very fussy on a sale. We went down a quiet road for a little test drive and not for a lengthy road test. The water issue was not present at this moment of time. However, it only became prevalent after driving away, after all docs signed. I did stated to Audi I wanted a diagnostic report. However, they carried out an Audicam which is footage of the issue. Audi have diagnosed the issue as a common issue where coupes/cabriolets accumulate water in the seals. However, I did state beforehand for no issue to be rectified due to me wanting to reject the vehicle. I am awaiting a report from Audi through email from the branch manager in relation to the issue. The issue so far is the water still being present in the sills. Audi tried to fix the issue however the problem is still prevalent. Regards 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

scottish power


tonyseventy4
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6500 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi guys... wonder if there is anything i can do here !i have a friend single parent wiv 2 kids ! she received no bill from scottish power for at east 2 years !!! now they sent her a letter saying pay or else! she started paying them every month ... then one month cancelled the direct debit for financial reasons ! she then phoned them again to reset the direct debit up, they said she had to apy more because she defaulted !!! she said cudnt afford it.... and they said well we will cut you off and said they had exhausted all payment avenues with her unless she would pay 40 % of her bill( bill= 2000)! so after bout a month they sent an advisor( and charged 25 quid for doin so) he said she had to pay 40 % or else they wud b applyin for a warrant to cut her off ! after finally gettin thru to scottish power.... she has to pay 300 quid up front then up her monthly payments to 110 !!!!!! kinda unaffordable ! any help wud b appreciated ,

cheers

tony

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's their fault if they haven't billed her but she's partly responsible for not finding out why. She still has to pay but if they are being unreasonable about at what rate refer your friend to energywatch. Just give them the details and they will take up the complaint on her behalf. Include all the facts, ie single parent, limited income. They are very sympathetic.

 

I would expect no less than a repayment schedule she can afford and a refund of the £25 fee. If your friend is lucky they might also reduce the total as a 'gesture of goodwill.'

 

Been in a similar situation. My thread from May: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-stores/5899-scottishpower.html

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I had numerous issues with Scottish Power when I was a debt adviser for CAB. Advise your friend to seek help from CAB as they will help in this situation. Your friend should not pay £300 as she cannot afford to and needs to arrange reasonable payments. Any court would recognise that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish I had read this sooner, I have had to deal with Grosvenor 'Legal' Services who collect on behalf of SP. This lot are incompetent idiots who have no idea of the law. Through shear panic I paid off £600 in one go (which was very hard) from a total debt of £1100, despite this they continued to threaten warrant etc. My mistake was that I presumed Grosvenor where in regular contact with SP and would keep them updated about payments etc. It appears they are not and only forward payments once a month en bloc.

I finall rang SP to find out that I was due in court 2 days after, only by some pleading was I able to stop this. They still made me pay £200 then and allow me to spread the balance over the year.

 

My advice is if you get letters from Grosvenor, ring SP and demand they take the debt back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish I had read this sooner, I have had to deal with Grosvenor 'Legal' Services who collect on behalf of SP. This lot are incompetent idiots who have no idea of the law. Through shear panic I paid off £600 in one go (which was very hard) from a total debt of £1100, despite this they continued to threaten warrant etc. My mistake was that I presumed Grosvenor where in regular contact with SP and would keep them updated about payments etc. It appears they are not and only forward payments once a month en bloc.

I finall rang SP to find out that I was due in court 2 days after, only by some pleading was I able to stop this. They still made me pay £200 then and allow me to spread the balance over the year.

 

My advice is if you get letters from Grosvenor, ring SP and demand they take the debt back.

 

You should still complain about this. Especially if you've been intimidated into paying more than you can afford.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have lived at my home for four years and only just recieved a bill for combined gas and electric. It is a new development and I eventually had to go to energy watch to find out who supplied me as they had all said it was not them.

 

Scottish power now say I owe 1450 which I do not dispute, however I cannot simply pay it in 7 days. I have offered a repayment plan to them via direct debit but they set up the wrong date and it got returned to them. They have now referred it to SPM collections who are actually part of SP. I am willing to go to court if I need to but it was there mistake. My serial number of my box outside was reporting to a house four doors down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can only bill you for the last 2 years now, not before, if they did not send you a statment or bill. Now if you ask for a 7 day read (take a read every day for 7 days) they will work out your average consumption over a 12 month period. x this by 2 and that gives you 2 years consumption. Also then you can demand these 2 years be charged at the price per KWH that it was at 2 years ago because they never sent you a letter of notification of price increases. Dont let them charge you at the new rate for the full 2 years. Because that is what the system will try to do.

 

If the supplier is at fault, and the customer has not received a bill for more than two years, then from July 2006 any outstanding amounts due to the supplier that relate to energy consumption for more than two years will be cancelled.

 

Code of practice for accurate bills .

 

edit >>>>>>>

From July 2007, this will reduce to one year

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...