Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • More from the Second Sight guys in the Law Gazette. Post Office Inquiry: Second Sight accountant accuses lawyer of conspiring to pervert course of justice | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Second Sight accountant found compelling evidence in two cases that evidence was withheld, public inquiry is told.  
    • Why have there not been arrests yet? Waiting for the end of an inquiry which seems designed to drag on forever is a feeble excuse "the Post Office “was constantly sabotaging our efforts” to seek the truth and used claims of legal professional privilege – a type of confidentiality which covers legal documents – “to justify withholding documents from us”. "Aujard had said the state-owned body “would not hesitate to take legal action against me” under a “draconian” non-disclosure agreement (NDA)" "Henderson became concerned after reviewing the case file of Jo Hamilton, .. Henderson said the Post Office’s decision to charge Hamilton did not seem to be supported by its own internal security report, and there was evidence that “potentially exculpatory material” had not been disclosed to her at trial or subsequently. “I regarded this as either professional misconduct or, potentially, criminal conduct,” he said."   Horizon IT scandal investigator tells inquiry Post Office was ‘sabotaging our efforts’ | Post Office Horizon scandal | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Ian Henderson, looking into possible miscarriages of justice, said he came to believe he was dealing with ‘a cover-up’  
    • and the elephant in the room     Brexit: New report suggests UK £311bn worse off by 2035 due to leaving EU NEWS.SKY.COM The report came up with a scenario for growth if the UK had stayed inside the EU, and compared it to forecasts the Office for Budget Responsibility made...    
    • I believe there is a Limitations issue with railway penalty charges. They have only 6 months and if it gets to Court  the money goes to the Treasury.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Halifax ignoring CCA, SAR requests.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5366 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ive been having problems with halifax. I sent them the first cca allowed them 12+2 etc etc. I had no reply whatsoever even though they cashed the cheque for £1 and signed for it as I sent it recorded delivery. I have sent follow up letters as advised by other posts on the forum and I have also sent the a Subject Access Request. They have cashed the cheque for £10 and signed for the letter (sent by recorded delivery again) but I have still had no response what so ever from any of my letters. I also sent them a letter from this site regarding harrassment as they ring at all times of day all night since i sent them the cca letters and Subject Access Request but again, no response at all. They continue to write, threatening legal action etc and ring every day.

What do I do next? :confused: Iv not had any response at all to any of the letters. Surely they cannot just ignore them all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the first things that you should do are to send formal complaints to the office of fair trading and also to trading standards under CPUT.

 

To the OFT you should complain that they are breaching guidelines on debt collection.

You should also write a letter of complaint to the IC

I think that the next thing that you should do to force compliance is to take legal action. On the facts that you give, you will win outright -- and probably they will simply settle out of court anyway.

 

Have you any information on any bank charges that they owe you? If you have then my best advice to you would be to claim back those bank charges and add a claim for the statutory breaches as part of that general claim. This will allow you to get the claim in as an ordinary small claim that only a small claims fee.

 

If you simply base your claim merely on the statutory breaches then you will probably have to start a part eight claim and this would be £150 -- although you will get that back when you win.

 

If you want to take any of this action then you should write them a seven-day letter before action and then sue.

 

Don't imagine that you could just write them a seven-day letter and they will suddenly takes fright and comply. If you are not prepared to go the whole distance then don't bother to write a letter and frankly if they ignore you and you may as well just give up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi silverfox1264 glad to see you have your own thread after you following Lavamyz thread & in the same situation as them.

 

Sounds like you have done so much groundwork in all your requests so far already which shows you have great knowledge already in these areas:). What dates did your 40 days run out on when you SAR them because as Bankfodder said you need to ICO them & do the rest of the complaints as well since you can't get the information you have requested. (Complaints about data protection policy - ICO)

 

 

are you still paying them? Also can you remember roughly what year you took your CCA out?

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...