Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parky V Barclays **SETTLED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6269 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, all printed off and ready to start the process, but have a question.

 

The letter says 'I calculate that you have taken £xxxx plus £xxxwhich you have charged me in overdraft interest for the sum which you have taken. Total £xxxx'

 

but the notes tell me not to ask for the overdraft interest yet.

 

What do I do? do I calculate the interest owed, put it in the leter but not on the schedule?

 

thanks for your help.

 

E

Link to post
Share on other sites

The interest you add on the preliminary letter is what you have been charged by Barclays as interest because you were beyond your overdraft limit. Most people dont bother with this. When you get to put in your court claim you then add on 8% interest to all the charges that Barclays have made.

 

Hope this helps - look at 'Rooster' posts as I think he has explained it more fully

 

Spotty

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Statement request 4th May

Prelim Letter sent 24th May

LBA 7th June

Thanks but no thanks letter sent 22 June

MCOL 22nd June

Claim acknowledged 26 June

AQ sent 2nd August

17 Nov Court Date Set for 29 Jan 2007

Settled in full 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Parky,

Are you talking about Prelim letter? if so you only add interest on if you file a claim (in other words, if they dont refund your charges then take them to court add interest on then 8%) dont add on when requesting refunds at prelim stage. Hope this helps:) Good Luck

LETS ROCK !!!:D :D :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The interest you add on the preliminary letter is what you have been charged by Barclays as interest because you were beyond your overdraft limit. Most people dont bother with this. When you get to put in your court claim you then add on 8% interest to all the charges that Barclays have made.

 

Hope this helps - look at 'Rooster' posts as I think he has explained it more fully

 

Spotty

 

Thanks for that. Think it will be a nightmare to try to separate what I was charged cos i was over my overdraft limit, and what I was charged cos i was just overdrawn.

 

Think I will go ahead with just the 'Paid ref fees' and the 'charge for unpaid items'...which ammount to a lovely £1020!

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Dead right!

(there's a template for it in the library)

Victimnomore

By day, quiet unassuming bank customer - but, by night, .. .. .. .. ..

Barclays Case1

14/03/07 **WON** FULL settlement £3358.39

Barclays Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £187.91 back.

Halifax Case1

14/03/07 **WON** Refunded £728 (including £54 costs)

Halifax Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £268.24 back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send a private message to a MOD (green guys) they will change it for you. Can i just say to all that read the prelim and LBA letters that state plus interest in the letter it means OVERDRAFT INTEREST if they take you overdrawn from a charge and they also apply interest then you CAN claim that back but only if you go into an unauthorised overdraft. The 8% interest is only done at court stages.

 

Good Luck. You seem like you are doing fine.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

They filed a defence today....I make that a day over the deadline but thats life i guess...moneyclaim seem to have accepted it and it will be 'transferred to the appropriate court'.

 

Bugger.

 

Well, no one ever said it was going to be straightforward, so barclays, if you are reading this....BRING IT ON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Even though the claim was transferred to my local court (Uxbridge), and i filed my AQ in time and all that, I have today received a 'General Form of Order' and the claim has been transferred to the London Mercantile in the Royal Corts of Justice.

 

Is this normal? Can anyone help me understand what is going on? How can it be moved to suit them, when i am the 'injured' party?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks welshman. No date set yet, just really surprised that after being transferred to me local court, they can click their fingers and get it transferred to a different one.

 

I will await my court date in that case...thanks for putting my mind at rest!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

eparkus,

have you got a date yet for the Mercantile court?

I'm at the same stage now and my local court is Uxbridge.

I was expecting this to happen as I'd looked through other people's pathways from Uxbridge and it all led to the same place - Mercantile!

Ordered Statements: 06/10/06

Statements Received: 11/10/06

Prelim letter posted: 11/10/06

Standard Reply Received: 19/10/06

LBA posted: 25/10/06

MCOL filed 09/11/06

Offer of Part payment letter received 09/11/06

Rejection letter sent to Barclays 13/11/06

Amendments sent to MCOL 21/11/06

Sealed claim received from MCOL 25/01/07

Claim received by Barclays 29/01/07

2 weeks to defend - deadline 13/02/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eparkus, the bank havn't had this transferred to Merc Court, it is something the courts are doing because they are fed up to the back teeth with the banks not settling straight away and wasting courts time. The is absolutely no way that the bank wants to go to Merc court as this court can set a precedent - so don't worry, your money is virtually guaranteed now ;-)

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

Forgot to post on this thread (though did on the settled cases thread so the money gets added up!) that they offered the full cash back before the court date, and I accepted. Sorry, know i should have stung it out but having a tough time at the mo so the miney was better in my account than messing around with them. Good luck to all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations!

 

You did right, if they paid up in full before court, you HAD to accept the money, so don't beat yourself up.

 

Please ensure you complete the survey (link at the top of the page).

 

Well done again. If you can afford it, remember this site survives on donations only. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...