Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Warrant of execution / DVLA addresses


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5343 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

can someone please clear something up for me. I am a bit confused as to the rules on PCNs (from Local Authorities) and the RK address supplied by the DVLA.

 

So if someone moves house and therefore doesn't get the original paperwork can the council simply amend the address from that supplied by the DVLA? Also can they issue warrants of execution to addresses different to that supplied by the DVLA?

 

sorry if this seems a really stupid question but I thought I had read somewhere on this forum that warrants of execution could only be issued to the address supplied by the DVLA at the date of the contravention. Is that the case or have i dreamt this up?

 

I will also put this post on the bailiffs section in case i read it there.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although the Local Authority cannot just change the address on the warrant, a change of address would not "invalidate" the warrant as far as execution is concerned. The warrant is merely the document that enables the bailiff to seize one's goods.

 

However, if you have proof of a change of address pre-dating the issue of a Notice to Owner, Charge Certificate and Notice of Debt Registration from the Local Authority, you stand a good chance of successfully filing an "Out of Time Statutory Declaration" with the Traffic Enforcement Centre at Northampton County Court. If accepted, the Local Authority will reset the PCN to stage 1 and give you 14 days to pay the original discounted price.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can someone please clear something up for me. I am a bit confused as to the rules on PCNs (from Local Authorities) and the RK address supplied by the DVLA.

 

So if someone moves house and therefore doesn't get the original paperwork can the council simply amend the address from that supplied by the DVLA? Also can they issue warrants of execution to addresses different to that supplied by the DVLA?

 

sorry if this seems a really stupid question but I thought I had read somewhere on this forum that warrants of execution could only be issued to the address supplied by the DVLA at the date of the contravention. Is that the case or have i dreamt this up?

 

I will also put this post on the bailiffs section in case i read it there.

 

Thanks

.

Thank you for posting this question !! This is a subject that really does get to me so I will say sorry in advance for the long response......

.

.

 

If you incur a PCN the local authority will make a request to DVLA for details of vehicle keeper and a letter will be sent to that address to request payment. ALL further notices such as the Notice to Owner, Order for Recovery will also be sent to that same address.

 

We have had cases where the registered keeper moved home within days of apparently incurring a PCN and even though they had advised DVLA of their NEW ADDRESS all notices would still have to go to the address originally given by DVLA.

 

Unless a person has arranged for postal divert then they would not have received these notices and eventually the local authority make a request for the debt to be registered with the Traffic Enforcement Centre and this will lead to a Warrant of execution being issued and passed to the relevant bailiff company to enforce.

 

What happens next is CRUCIAL.

 

Bailiff companies will then "data cleanse" (their wording not mine) the warrants using various agencies and they will then locate a new address.

 

The motorist will be sent a letter to his NEW address and most times this is the very first that they knew of the PCN (other times are when a car is clamped or removed after being located using the bailiff companies ANPR vehicles).

 

When the Operation Guidance for Local Authorities was issued last year by the DfT for the new Traffic Management Act 2004 it provided that a bailiff could change the address on a Warrant.

 

This prompted an immediate complaint by yours truly and a question was raised in the House of Lords which led to this provision being removed.

 

That should have been the end of the matter.......but was not !!

 

 

 

Clearly complaints were made to the Ministry of Justice (possibly by bailiff companies) and for reasons that are still unclear the MOJ issued changes to Part 75 of the CPR Rules as follows:

 

Warrant of execution

 

75.7

 

(1) An authority seeking the issue of a warrant of execution must file a request –

(a) certifying the amount remaining due under the order;

 

(b) specifying the date of service of the order on the respondent; and

 

© certifying that the relevant period has elapsed.

 

 

(2) The court will seal the request and return it to the authority.

 

(3) Within 7 days of the sealing of the request the authority must prepare the warrant in the appropriate form.

 

(4) No payment under a warrant will be made to the court.

 

(5) For the purposes of execution a warrant will be valid for 12 months beginning with the date of its issue.

 

 

(6) An authority may not renew a warrant issued in accordance with this Part beyond the 12 month validity period but, subject to paragraph (7), an authority may request the reissue of a warrant during the 12 month validity period.

 

 

(7) Where the address of the respondent has changed since the issue of the warrant, the authority may request the reissue of the warrant by filing a request –

 

(a) specifying the new address of the respondent;

 

 

(b) providing evidence that the new address for the respondent does relate to the respondent named in the order and against whom enforcement is sought; and

 

 

© certifying that the amount due under the order remains unpaid.

 

 

 

(8) Where the court is satisfied that the new address of the respondent given in the request for the reissue of the warrant relates to the respondent named in the order, it will seal the request and return it to the authority.

 

 

(9) The authority must prepare the reissued warrant in the appropriate form within 7 days of the sealing of the request to reissue.

 

(10) A reissued warrant will only be valid for the remainder of the 12 month period beginning with the date it was originally issued.

 

 

 

 

PS: Complaints have been sent to various bodies as this change to the CPR Rules was made without ANY consultation !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tomtubby! That question was actually intended for you but I didn't want to email or PM as I know how busy you are.

 

Thanks very much for the response. I did think you had told me something like that in the past hence the question!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jbw are very good at doing this. I have seen several of their warrants where the issue time is 12.00 and it was issued to the enforcement officer at 10.00. If i have put anything wrong on my replies or threads then jbw would have done something about it.

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tomtubby! That question was actually intended for you but I didn't want to email or PM as I know how busy you are.

 

Thanks very much for the response. I did think you had told me something like that in the past hence the question!

.

.

My pleasure.

 

This subject is one that is so serious that it deserves being made public.

 

Every year approx 48,000 motorists file an Out of Time late Statutory declaration with TEC and the common reason for their application is becuse they had NOT received the PCN becuse all notices had gone to a previous address.

 

A further unknown fact is that many local authority Contracts provide that the relevent BAILIFF COMPANY be responsible for dealing with rejecting the Out of Time Declaration will many of them also attending Court on BEHALF of the local authority to oppose an N244 !!

 

Shocking!!!.....but true...

Link to post
Share on other sites

.

.

A further unknown fact is that many local authority Contracts provide that the relevent BAILIFF COMPANY be responsible for dealing with rejecting the Out of Time Declaration will many of them also attending Court on BEHALF of the local authority to oppose an N244 !!

 

Shocking!!!.....but true...

 

As it is an "unknown fact", can you list the LA's that you are aware please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...