Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to cover yourself, you should write them a letter in response telling them that you are rejecting their offer. That they know full well that their insurance is an attempt to limit or exclude liability contrary to section 57 Consumer rights act and is a secondary contract contrary to section 72.  By the way was the offer made without prejudice or in confidence or anything? Maybe you could post up their offer here please
    • "Dear HR, I refer to my correspondence of *date* in which I challenged xxx, copy attached. Clearly this was a grievance, and yet does not seem to have been heard under the grievance procedure. I am exceptionally dismayed that this 'review'. which never took place, seems to be being used as a criteria in redundancy selection proceedings. As this is time critical, please advise asap."            
    • Just to update, received a revised offer of £75 from P2G after they got my LOC last Friday. They stated that because it was not insured this would be their final offer. Looks like we are going to court.
    • and speaking of cover-ups .. from the environment agency with collusion/negligence  from the ICO   Environment Agency chief admits regulator buries freedom of information requests Speaking at the UK River Summit, Philip Duffy said officials do not want to reveal the true ‘embarrassing’ environmental picture ICO - waffle Environment Agency chief admits regulator buries freedom of information requests | Environment Agency | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Speaking at the UK River Summit, Philip Duffy said officials do not want to reveal the true ‘embarrassing’ environmental picture   Environment Agency ‘hiding’ report into Lancashire landfill making locals ill Exclusive The agency has refused to share details of how a landfill operator is breaching its permit because it could 'potentially cause unnecessary concern'    Environment Agency ‘hiding’ report into Lancashire landfill making locals ill INEWS.CO.UK The agency has refused to share details of how a landfill operator is breaching its permit because it could 'potentially cause unnecessary...  
    • As Dan Neidle pointed out on Twitter/X, pensioners used to have a higher personal allowance before they paid tax, but this government removed it a few years ago.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrears paid, now threatening 'action' over so called charges?


Ripley2008
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5394 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Back in October my friend was in danger of losing her home through arrears in her mortgage. Thankfully, with help from CAG (especially El-enn)an agreement was made for her to pay off the amount owed, and maintain her normal monthly payment. This was accomplished end of Apr or May (can't remember without checking)

During the period she was constantly getting letters from them (Derbyshire Home Loans) stating she was paying late. She wasn't, in fact she was paying earlier than the stated date. She rang them, just to explain this, THREE times, and each time they said they would sort it out. The final conversation she had with them was "..... just ignore them, as they are computer generated, and sent out automatically, even though she has paid up to date ...".

 

However, over the last few weeks she has been getting letter stating that she is still in arrears due to their charges. Tbh, we thought this was just a case of the computer not catching up with the real world as yet.

 

This weekend she has received a letter from their solicitor stating that she is £1220.04 in default of the order???, and threatening to take further action, if not paid withing seven days.

 

She is now, once again at her wits end, and has asked me to come here again for help.

 

So, please anyone, advice and help would be greatly appreciated. In view of the 7 day request, as soon as possible please.

 

Regards,

Paula

Rip x

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly- although it is a bit late - she should not do anything over the phone without recording.

She has received verbal assurance and has no way of proving it.

 

What are the charges? Late payment charges?

 

I think that the starting point is to write to them outlining completely the step she has taken in respect of all of the letter which sh has received from them - the responses she has med etc. I don't think that this will help very much but you may as well get it down on paper for the record. They can formaly accept or reject what she says - or ignore her.

 

I think that a separate letter should be used to respond to the latest demand. She should otline what she believes her financial position to be and why she thinks that their figures are incorrect.

This same letter should be used to decalre that the account is formally in dispute - both because of their calculating error and also because of their chargs which I am quite sure will be unfair.

 

Whatever they say, she must keep on making the agreed payments. Even if she receives a letter telling her that only full payment is now acceptable - she must continue paying regularly.

 

Be aware that they may be right and that the accounting error may be hers. In this case, she only has the unfair level of charges to argue.

 

She needs to get the position clarified as quickly as possible to stop the problem deteriorating any further.

 

If you can ascertain for certain where the error lies, then we may be able to help you further

 

Ell-en will have a better handle on this han me

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Arrears are technically the difference between the payment due each month and the payment received. Arrears charges should be added to the debt and not included in arrears figures for any court action.

 

First of all it must be clear about how they have come to the figure and also your friend should be clear about what was said in court and make a record of what she has paid each month since then. She was only obliged to keep to what the court ruled was a satisfactory arrangement.

 

I agree with the above . I would write a letter saying the amount requested is in dispute. As them for a complete breakdown of payments due and received since the arrears began plus a SEPARATE breakdown of all charges added to the account and the reasons for each charge.

 

Then this will give you the information needed to decide whether to make an official complaint to the FOS if necessary.

  • Haha 1

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry also as she has received the letter asking for payment within 7 days she /he must emphasis that an early reply is needed before payment can be considered . As a last resort then a SAR letter must be sent.

 

The FSA has recently criticized lenders for charging for late payments and or just being in arrears and also some people have been successful in claiming back charges through the FOS.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, were the arrears management charges included in the amount the lender was claiming in court?

 

What figure was on the judgement order she would have received in the post after the hearing.

 

Once we know the above we can advise further.

 

Ell-enn

  • Haha 1

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

Firstly, thank you for your prompt replies. Sorry I was unable to get here sooner myself.

 

Bankfodder:

She has been told the reasons for NOT entering into a phone conversation, and no longer does it.

The charges, from what I can understand are 'monthly arrears fees', and 'customer contact fees'.

I understand the need for the two letters, and shall be composing them with her tomorrow, as she will be here.

 

One thing I'm not sure I understand though, and it may be purely down to my original post.

The arrears that were owed HAVE been cleared entirely, as per the instructions from the court. That being the case, what should she continue to pay? Are you saying she should continue to pay an amount equal to what was arranged? (This would be extra to her mortgage payment)

 

Hello Jansus:

I think your first statement is exactly what HAS happened. They are now asking her to pay off the charges made for the arrears. Surely, this would be a never ending situation? Simply because as long as she had 'arrears' (albeit gained by any charges they have made) they could continue to add them whilst she was paying these ones off! It would never end I feel!

 

The actual order from the court reads, "blah, blah blah suspended on payment of currently monthly instalments plus arrears of £1468.60 by £150 per month.

 

Then, at the bottom of the page, under the heading "To the defendant" it states.

'......unless you pay the arrears and costs at the rate set out above in addition to the current rent, you must leave ....'

 

So, these extra figures are not mentioned at all.

The letters sent will also contain your advice, thankyou.

 

Ell-enn, Hello again,

 

I think I've answered your queries in Jansus' replies?

No, the charge they are now asking for were not included, and the original figure was for £1468.60.

 

Just as a point of info, she does have receipt for all but one of the payments made. She stupidly didn't ask for a receipt on the first payment. The reasons why she should were pointed out to her by myself at the time.

 

One question: should we write to the solicitor involved at all?

 

Many thanks so far

Paula. (I should be at my computer most of tomorrow)

Edited by Ripley2008

Rip x

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, we need a strong letter to the solicitors - I'll happily draft one for you if you need me to. You cannot be in arrears with charges - you can only be in arrears with contractual payments i.e. the installments you agreed to pay on your mortgage. Charges should be added to the end of the mortgage. I'd like to see a judge's reaction if they were to try to evict her for for arrears charges - in fact - I'd pay to watch that hearing!!

 

Just make absolutely sure that she has paid the total amount that was stated on the court order - check bank statements etc.

 

A letter to the FOS is also recommended as they have already intervened in other cases regarding mortgage arrears charges.

 

 

Ell

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell,

 

I thought they had got it wrong, thanks.

I wrote her a letter that has been posted to the company, sent by recorded, signed for (think that's the right way)

Would greatly appreciate a letter for the solicitor though. Both of us are a little concerned that they may act without further word from the company. Can they do that?

Perhaps something for the FOS too.

She's absolutely sure that all payments have been made. She paid them by cash, direct into their account each month - except the first, which she paid over the phone, and that's the one she forgot to ask for a receipt number. However, the amount did go from her bank, which she can prove. All other payments have a receipt, and I also marked them off in the diary.

 

Many thanks for help and advice x

(Will be here tomorrow, well, today actually, Thursday. Out all day Friday though.)

Rip x

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, sorry for delay. Affixed is the letter to solicitors - send by recorded delivery and keep a copy of everything you send.

 

You will need to affix a copy of the letter that was sent to the lender and also proof of all the payments made.

 

Any questions, just shout :)

 

Ell

Ripley 2008 letter 17 Aug.doc

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell,

No problem. I knew you'd get here when you had the time.

I've printed it and added all the relevant paperwork. She will be over in the morning to sign and post it.

 

Many thanks again, will keep you informed on response(s)

 

TC Paula

Rip x

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell,

Hope you are keeping well.

 

My friend received a reply from Derbyshire Home Loans today basically acknowledging receipt of her letter and stating that they will investigate using their Internal Complaints Procedure and that it may take up to 4 weeks to complete. May be sooner though.

 

However, the problem today is that she also received another letter from them, albeit a different dept.

This states that "having checked our records I note that a reply has not been received" ... (obviously not very well).

and "unless they do within 10 days further action for recovery of the same will be taken".

Stating that arrears of this nature result in an increase in the mortgage balance upon which interest is charged on a daily basis

 

Should we respond to this letter?

 

TC,

Paula

Rip x

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a copy of the letter you sent and the reply you received

-recorded of course- with a covering letter (resist the temptation to point out that their record checking leaves something to be desired!!)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...