Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Bookmakers use betting on political events to entice new customers, and say it is growing.View the full article
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Anyone paying a fee when paying a bailiff company by debit card??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry to clog up the board a bit tonight.

I'm just wondering if anybody is paying a fee when paying their monthly/weekly payments by debit card?

Surprisingly there are companies who charge as much as 2 pound per payment from a debit card, calling it an 'admin fee'. These are completely extortionate and, in my opinion, unlawful.

There is definitely a way we can stop this and save money for thousands of people out there.

If anyone is willing to help (it is as simple as a phone call or email) then please let me know!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately this is legal, as companies are charged by the banks for taking debit/credit card payments.

 

Debit cards tend to be a set ammount between about 50p and £2.00, credit cards are generally a percentage of the ammount being paid.

 

But as i say, all that is is the company passing on the charge to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately this is legal, as companies are charged by the banks for taking debit/credit card payments.

 

Debit cards tend to be a set ammount between about 50p and £2.00, credit cards are generally a percentage of the ammount being paid.

 

But as i say, all that is is the company passing on the charge to you.

 

I think you'll find this is unfair business practice. It was ruled that debit collection companies cannot reasonable add more charges to a debt. This should be accounted for under business expenses.

Theres a thread on here relating to the illeagal charges and to the court case that set the president.

 

Fwog

Link to post
Share on other sites

i actually think everything about bailiff companies is unfair lol

 

i was paying 3 account and being charged £1 for each one.

 

the council told me it was legal. then again the council told me they couldnt take back my council tax and i HAD to deal with bailiffs ! Hmmm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am on the understanding £1.00 is the limit for paying by debit card

 

I think it all depends on the bank.

 

I used to work at a car dealership and the bank were charging us £1.75 for each debit card transaction and 2.5% for credit cards!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect Yoshiro that it was because of the high value of your claims, many of these people paying to bailiff companies are paying less than £100 a time, sometimes only £10 a time.. £2 on top of £10 is a lot!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends on what bank the bailiff is with as to the fee debit cards are fixed fee and credit is on % so if you are paying large amounts its less to pay by debit but under £150 you will save by paying by credit card or like i keep saying its free to put it into there bank most of the time you can do this on internet banking for free because all you are doing paying by card is paying another bank charge.

Edited by lets fight bailiffs
my kids put me off put wrong thig down
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies.

To be completely honest, when starting this thread, I didn't really care if it is 'ethical' or legal to charge a fee to make a payment by debit card...Jacobs bailiffs (my ex employer) charge a fee of £2 per transaction unless the council tells them to accept otherwise. This is the important part. Most councils don't even know they are charging this fee. The ones who have had complaints to them (Barnet, Sheffield, Chester Le Street, Durham...the list goes on) have told the bailiff companies to waive fees or reduce them significantly (50p on most occasions)

 

I actually started this thread because I know how easy it is to have these fees reduced or waived for everybody. All it takes is a few phone calls or emails to councils and they will force the bailiff companies to do this. I have the email addresses and phone numbers for the back office for almost all councils in the uk, all I need is enough people to complain and the fees will be stopped. Remember that these companies take hundreds of payments per day so you can only imagine how much they make per year in fees...so we must stop them!

 

If anyone is willing to help, even just by sending a quick email, then please help me know! £2 might not sound a lot, but for a family with children paying £5 p/w (there are lots of these cases) it would cost £104 per year, which makes me sick to be honest.

 

Please get back to me. It is easier to stop these fees than you think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be up for this, after going through the statement they sent me I found out Philips have taken an extra £5 in charges on top of what I was already paying them, plus a £50 "registration fee" and a £100 visit fee for a visit that never happened!

Be good to yourself, when nobody else will

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had several dealings with Newlyn over the years. Off the top of my head they charge a whopping 5% (if I remember correctly). AM awaiting a SAR so will soon find out, but I know it was a very high figure. Let's see if they declare that with the screenshot!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, thanks, it would be good to know what all the bailiff companies charge for taking a payment and also what council were you dealing with? Jacobs bailiffs charge a different amount per council because certain councils won't allow charges.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent, thanks, it would be good to know what all the bailiff companies charge for taking a payment and also what council were you dealing with? Jacobs bailiffs charge a different amount per council because certain councils won't allow charges.

Thanks

 

 

Philips charge me 50p for a debit card transaction and £3.00 for a credit card.

Be good to yourself, when nobody else will

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yoshiro,

The companies do NOT usually get charged for taking a debit card payment, and if they do then it is definitely not more than 50 pence. These fees are unlawful and should be banned.

 

Good news though, a few more councils have abolished or reduced the fees!

If you are willing to help and send an email or make a phone call to your local council to ask the fees to be abolished the please PM me!

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Companies should swallow the transaction costs as a cost of sale. It cannot be considered as a cost that must be passed on to the payer.

 

When I but my shopping in Tesco I don't expect to see a portion of the cashiers hourly salary on my bill.

 

I paid £400 to Swift Credit bailiffs and they actually took £420.

 

These fees are not laid down in the regulations and are therefore unlawful.

 

1970.

It's going to be an interesting year...

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all its not the cashiers your paying for with the fee, its rental of the machine and a cost per transaction for handling it.

 

Consumer_Justice, i would like to point out that you are wrong. Any company that uses these machines to take payment are charged by the bank that issues them for each transaction.

 

It is not illegal for them to charge it, the difference between the bailiffs and the shops is that the shops factor this cost into the pricing of their products.

 

As i have stated, it is not "illegal" for them to charge it, however it has been deemed by the councils, and possibly the courts to be an unfair charge, so therefore there is a difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have investigated this a little it seems bailiffs cant charge a credit card fee there was a detailed asessment on the subject and the out come was that they can not charge a credit card fee but I think it seems any one is yet to challenge the debit card fee in the same way I was considering a detailed asessment for this myself we shall see

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...