Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Washer Catches Fire Damages Kitchen Claim Advice Now Needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5269 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

the finance co who sold me the washer rang me up today and said the washer must go back to indeset for futher investigation.im worried here wether the finance company and indeset have got there heads together in a plot to get out of this mess.loose the washer or something sinster like this .please advise asp there coming on tuesday to pick this up from my home .no side accepting liability on this matter

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is difficult, as the burden of proof is on you. there is a risk that if they take it you lose control of the situation. You need to be getting quite firm on your claim with them. I really think that it is time to get your insurers and/or professional legal advice involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

YES KRAKEN YOU ARE RIGHT I NEED TO TAKE A GRIP AND GET TOUGH ON THE SHOWER.INVOLVING MY INSURERS MEANS THAT I WILL HAVE TO PAY EXCESS AND ALSO MY PREMIUM WILL GO UP FOR MY RENEWELL.IM INCLINED TO GET THE LEGAL PEOPLE INVOLVED BUT AGAIN I WORK SO WONT GET OUT FOR NOTHING LEGALLY SO EXPECT AGAIN HUGE LEGAL FEES .SO CANT WIN HERE AT ALL I NEED A STRONG LETTER SENDING TO ALL PARTIES HERE STRAIGHT TO THE POINT NO PRISONERS ANY ONE PUT A LETTER TOGETHER FOR ME OR SUGGEST WHAT TO INCLUDE IN IT . THANK YOU ALL .

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may find that there is a clause in your insurance agreement that means that you need to tell them, you may also get an amount of legal cover with your contents insurance.

 

Getting them involved is likely to be cheaper than all of the alternatives. You shouldn't end up out of pocket if they recover from the business or manufacturer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes kraken i have contacted them buildings insurers .asked why i had not reported such a serious matter when incident occured .going to get some one to contact me on monday she said i might be in a breach of my policy re the delay in informing the insurers .also thought i was covered with contents on same policy no im only covered for the buildings part so i have no contents insurance ,no legal cover on buildings policy 300.00 excess payment .it gets better dosent it .

Link to post
Share on other sites

tried to upload photos of washer but cant .it seems that dunraven finance are not going to abide by the supply of goods act implied terms 1973.no reply to e mails or nothing no more no contact .so im going to have to take them to court. so need to find a letter to send to them re court action .home buildings insurance said this should have been reported before this .no legal also no contents in with policy as well .so court the only way out here .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

as u may be aware washer caught fire damaged kitchen ect. indeset have asked for the claim to be sent to them but are not accepting liability.what is the basis of the claim .repair and decoration to kitchen area.clothes in washer damaged also the dryer badly damaged and dangerous .how do i set out this claim .do i need to include compesation for our suffering ect .but god knows how i go about it .advice needed please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I would certainly claim for all those things.

Do you have any household insurance or are you claiming direct from Indesit? I only ask that because if you had insurance you could perhaps claim on that and let the insurers claim their losses back from Indesit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if u have the fire service report and that states the cause being the washer and u have time and dated photos showing all the damage including photos of the damaged washer i cant see any problem letting the washer manufacturer having it for inspection just make sure u have a bill of sale or invoice with the serial number on and that the fire report also lists the serial number also take a photo of the number also if it did go to court with all that evidance plus the fire report id have a good guess who the judge would believe you and the fire service PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i seem lost here probally lack of brain. hopefully someone might help . im told that my claim does not fall in indesets lap as manufactuers. but i claim under the supply of goods act implied terms against buy as you view who i signed h p agreement with . buy as you view are not helpfull at all wont supply copies of agreement ect. tell me u send ur claim to indeset . wont enter in corrospondence with us at all apart from a letter not spoken to us since day of fire .indest have had washer back and today stated that the investigations complete and are fully satisfied that there was no external interference on the washer so investigations complete and closed .what does this mean liability is who . do we have an admission of liability from indeset. buy as you view have decided that since this news they now require a copy of the fire report . indest refused such report as it was not telling u the cause of the fire. i think that buy as you view are time wasting . the kitchen was damaged work tops and also work units on other side of kitchen .window double glazed scorched.also complete re clean plus a complete redecoration of the kitchen . the problem i do have is the builder cant get the units or work surface to match the rest that are undamaged . he suggests it will need a full replacement kitchen .also said water from hose pipes firemen may have damaged other units any way as they are chip board and absorb water so may be damaged anyway . can i claim this or what?? a dryer was damaged by fire .also various items kettle . deep fat fryer .clothes in the washer .plus other items . also can we claim compensation on top of this .right confusing dont know what to do not a legal person need advice in what to do . any help advice will do buy as you view not helpfull at all . indeset not really bothered about it at all . but im living in squaller .also buildings insurance but no contents cover incident 1 july 2009

Edited by sweets-on-the-move
made error with date
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. the manufacturer may be liable for the damage to the kitchen and the surrounds, but not the machine itself.

 

the supplier should be liable for the whole shebang.

 

Going through your post to ensure I have the right idea (y'know that paragraphs can really help? Good rule of thumb is one point, one paragraph...)

 

I'm told that my claim does not fall in indesets lap as manufactuers. but i claim under the supply of goods act implied terms against buy as you view who i signed h p agreement with.

 

Half right, the Consumer Protection Act and the General Product Safety Regs allows a claim against the manufacturer by the ultimate consumer of an item if it is dangerous. You cannot claim for the cost of the item itself though.

 

See here: Product Liability, Defective Products, Unsafe Products Fact Sheet - BIS

 

 

Buy as you view are not helpfull at all wont supply copies of agreement etc. tell me u send ur claim to indeset . wont enter in corrospondence with us at all apart from a letter not spoken to us since day of fire.

 

I think you mean they are just being difficult and obstructive. Quell surprise. As noted earlier, you will need to actually sue them. Time to seek professional advice if you don't feel confident doing this yourself.

 

 

indest have had washer back and today stated that the investigations complete and are fully satisfied that there was no external interference on the washer so investigations complete and closed .what does this mean liability is who . do we have an admission of liability from indeset.

 

Sounds like - 'the washer was buggered, now go sue BAYV'. Possibly an admission, but I'd want to see the report myself. Looks like you will need to sue someone. Time to seek professional advice if you don't feel confident doing this yourself.

 

 

buy as you view have decided that since this news they now require a copy of the fire report . indest refused such report as it was not telling u the cause of the fire. i think that buy as you view are time wasting.

 

the report might be damning - you want to see it. But; are indesit saying that the fire was not caused by the machine or was the cause unknown? this is a tad contradictory to earlier statements 'the investigations complete and are fully satisfied that there was no external interference'.

 

 

the kitchen was damaged work tops and also work units on other side of kitchen .window double glazed scorched.also complete re clean plus a complete redecoration of the kitchen . the problem i do have is the builder cant get the units or work surface to match the rest that are undamaged . he suggests it will need a full replacement kitchen .also said water from hose pipes firemen may have damaged other units any way as they are chip board and absorb water so may be damaged anyway . can i claim this or what?? a dryer was damaged by fire .also various items kettle . deep fat fryer .clothes in the washer .plus other items . also can we claim compensation on top of this.

 

Yes, you can claim for all your losses from BAYV and all bar the cost of the machine itself from Indesit, if you can prove that the fire was caused by a defect with the machine. You can claim a nominal sum for the inconvenience suffered whilst repairs to the kitchen are being undertaken, probably only a few hundred quid though. As regards the cost of a whole new kitchen, you are entitled to be put back into the position you were in before the damage. If your kitchen was only a couple of years old you may get the full cost of replacement, if it was a decade or more you may just get a sum in compensation for the damage. it may be possible to replace some carcasses and door fronts and plinths and not the whole lot.

 

 

right confusing dont know what to do not a legal person need advice in what to do . any help advice will do buy as you view not helpfull at all . indeset not really bothered about it at all . but im living in squaller .also buildings insurance but no contents cover incident 1 july 2009

 

 

it is likely that you will need to sue someone. Time to seek professional advice if you don't feel confident doing this yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

IN JULY HAD A ACCIDENT PRODUCT SET FIRE DAMAGED KITCHEN.PRODUCT FAULTY INSURERS ACCEPT LIABILITY.THEY WISH ME TO SUBMIT MY CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION .DAMAGE CAUSED TO AREA .LOSS OF PERSONELL BELONGINGS .WHAT I NEED TO KNOW ARE WE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION FOR STRESS UPSET INCONVINENCE ECT NO REAL INJURIES JUST SMOKE ECT .HOW IS IT ASSESED.CAN ANY ONE HELP

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

had a incident in july 09 re washer exploding bursting into flames .in nov 09 co refered to insurers.insurers based in italy .get letter submit docs evidence of claim. did so .rang me and said we will sort it asp if u keep ur claim under 10,000e. the full claim was 5,490.00 sterling.next thing i know a week ltr i get phone call from delta claims services leeds .saying they were acting for the insurers .

i have written confirmation that liability will be accepted. due to delay i got my own builders in .do they need to stop straight away.cease any futher works .or what also i was told this is a penny pinching scheme by insurers to whittle the claim down told this co will do it well .any please urgent advice here.....................

Link to post
Share on other sites

my own insurers were not involved as i did not want the premiums to rise .not my fault fire was a faulty washer .indeset insureres said we accept liability so i thought lengh of time lets get the work done .ihad really made my mind up by going to court to recover losses.problem come when insurers said hopefully we shall put an offer to me later in the day insurers italy .so instead of settlement they appoint delta claim services .to minimise the losses to indeset .fire damaged kitchen only done a few yrs ago about 2 5 mths.im paying the builders what shall i do

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...