Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, so just been to see my friend, she still has her head firmly in the sand and had a pile of unopened post, thankfully nothing serious apart from this case!    In answer to your question it says N24 General Directions Order at the bottom of the page, then on page 2 where the line says "As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) " this is N271 Notice of transfer of proceedings.  Within the stack of letters I found 2 from Kearns Solicitors,    02-12-2022 Document pack with covering letter stating under the s78 CCA please see enclosed  1) A copy of the executed Credit Agreement, 2)  A copy of the terms & conditions 3) A copy of the varied terms & conditions applicable at termination / assignment, and  4) A statement regarding the conduct of your account as requested by s78(1)(a) to (c)  (Would you like me to describe the documents attached?)   18-02-2023 Generic letter asking for her to contact them to discuss settlement or they will take to court for further legal action. 
    • well you made the cardinal sin by phoning these scammers at least once so their persistence could go on. however you are new so there you go. you never ever ever phone any of these likes of scammers on these fake schemes that seem plausible.  just like a DCA chasing any old debt .. they are NOT BAILIFFS and have  ZERO legal powers to actually do anything. dx  
    • Okay understood now just based on personal experience how long does this go on for 
    • civil recovery schemes run by the likes of RLP DWF etc etc are a scam. totally IGNORE EVERYTHING. no if's or but's dx  
    • I’m 17 years old and Received 2 letters from dwf with my name spelt wrong and they are asking for for £230.40. I rang dwf civil recovery the first time upon taking advice from citizens advice to explain to delay to deadline as I was in the process of receiving advice which wasn’t much help. When that deadline was done I then called again to delay the deadline as I’m struggling financially and it’s lot of money they are asking for and I tried to dispute the cost to which they said okay we will delay it another 7 days for you to dispute the cost but I asked them how do I dispute this to you or Sainsbury’s and they said “we can’t advise you on this matter” I’ve read a lot of threads saying to ignore them but I was unsure now as I’ve made contact and have tried to dispute the payment and pay it which might mean I have admitted. Would they just persist harder and take me to court eventually or file for a ccj.   I would like to ignore them still but I would like to send a strong email so they know I’m clued up and then ignore them. I also want to pay the reasonable amount and get this matter solved. any advice on the law or similar situations are helpful when I called them I asked for an itemised bill. £101 stolen goods  ( supposedly caught me because they watched me on cctv over the duration of the week) also why did they not stop me in the first day. £20.40 recovered goods £150 security costs     Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

cupcake68 Vs Egg


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4556 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I requested a cca from Egg on 190409 and sent them the acc in dispute letter once their 12 +2 was up having not heard anything from them.

 

Egg have now written to say they cannot comply unless we send proof of who we are! ie utility bill, bank statement etc or if not available a letter from a solicitor(!!!!!)

 

Are they just time wasting? Should I bother sending proof of id without signing anything. I have also had another letter saying they have received my complaint (would that be my letter saying you have not complied...?) and we will here within 8 weeks (but we need to help by logging into our acc!) I don't feel like doing anything, am I right?

 

Many thanks

 

Esile;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 472
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

I have received a DN from Egg.

 

I'm still learning about all this and I know they haven't made the same mistake as most ie they have allowed me plenty of time to pay but I don't really know what else can be wrong with a DN.

 

Could someone please check this one for me?

 

I am a little concerned about this account. I CCA'd them in March knowing it was an online application in 2007-8 so expected to get something back very quickly from them proving it enforceable.

 

I haven't received anything much but certainly no CCA so haven't paid a thing since.

 

Any advice appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

Cupcake

 

PS I haven't been logging into my account so not sure about the balance and whether they have been adding charges! - I was worried about doing it because when they sent back saying they couldn't send CCA without proof of ID it said I should log on then!

Edited by cupcake68
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have put this in dispute, then complain ASAP to Trading Standards, FSO and the Information Commissioners Office - they cannot default you whilst in dispute!

 

The DN looks fine to me - but it still should not have been issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Cheeky B******S!!

 

They sent me a DN quoting payment date by 24th July 2009 and on the 7th July they sent me another letter saying despite their previous correspondence I have not responded to the DN they recently sent me.

 

The letter is titled Legal action pending.

 

If I don't contact them my account may be transferred to solicitors!

 

Cheek!

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Katedog

 

I cca'd them in March and they failed to send an agreement.

 

They sent me a default notice with about a month to pay on and then sent a letter half way through saying that I had chosen to ignore their DN and today they have sent termination

CC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like you've got them worried

i would agree with others that you dont need to do anything,

i would advise that you compalin to everyone you can think of fos oft etc.

my egg thread is upto date if you want a look.

 

Katedog

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that!

 

I panicked because their DN was the only one of the twenty or so we have received that gave me enough time!

 

I assume they can't enforce it if the account is in dispute because they didn't comply with my request?

 

I'll have a little read on your thread.

 

Thanks for the support and good luck.

 

CC

Link to post
Share on other sites

So

Where do I stand now with this?

 

I'm assuming they will pass me on to a debt collector and I will write back saying they should not have passed on while the account is in dispute etc.

 

But now they have terminated can they de terminate when they realise ? Can they continue harrassing me for the full amount (I know they will whether they can or not).

 

I'm just trying to see a bit into the future. I know with others that have sent fault DN's I am pretty much sorted because they can only claim outstanding amount before termination but they have sent a correct DN.

 

I haven't found any threads to explain this on to me!

 

Thanks

 

CC

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a letter from Moorcroft asking for full payment. If I do not come to an arrangement by 080809 they will be starting legal proceedings.

 

So..

I assume I should be sending the letter stating the account was in dispute and they should not hvae passed the account on to them.

 

Are moorcroft part of Egg?

 

Is there anything else I need to know about them?

 

Thanks

 

CC

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send Moorcroft the bemused letter :)

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Your Reference:

Client reference:

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to you, as it is in dispute with ***OC*** and has been since ***Date***

 

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

 

 

As ***OC*** is now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, Office of Fair Trading Collection Guidelines and s10 Data Protection Act request, I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default, enforcement action is NOT permitted; under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law. Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to ***OC*** for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as ***DCA*** cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If ***DCA***chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

Yours faithfully

Print do not sign your name

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Clemma

 

I thought that was the case.

 

Do you know where I stand being that they terminated the ccount while it was in dispute because they didn't send me an agreement when I requested a CCA?

 

It was an online application in late 2007 early 2008.

 

I am amazed that they ignored my request on this one because I would have thought it an easy one for them to make up!!

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...