Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • There are 10 pages, and the other 9 are standard. E.g. ask me whether plea or not, my information etc. I would like to send another begging letter, but there’s no email address of the prosecutor.😭
    • correct thats all they are duty bound to supply. what else were you expecting it to provide? dx    
    • you seriously need to read up here then you'd know these answers. and TBH you are panicking about a nothing burger. the process they must follow is: send a letter of claim. ASK northants bulk to raise a court claim. IF IF IF you lose and a judgement CCJ is granted, THEN they have 6yrs to enforce said judgement, but ofcourse this is a debt regulated by the consumer credit act so there is NO right of forced entry even if they do return to court within 6yrs from judgement and again ASK the court to send bailiffs out. as for statute barring, the 6yrs SB starts ticking from the issuance date of the default notice+14 days or from the date of YOUR last payment/use of the credit...whichever is the LATER. the issuance of a court claim (regardless to if it progresses anywhere) stops the SB clock.
    • sorry but we need the full n244, their witness statement and ALL exhibits to one mass PDF please to properly advise. we do not need statements or blank forms or info leaflets. if Kearns have sent you their N180 then.... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5088148 3 copies yes to mediation (unless you filed our Statute Barred Defence OR this is a claim for a Private Parking Ticket) 1 wit you Suitability for determination without a hearing? no (that the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally') the rest is obv 1 to the court 1 to their sols (omit phone/sig/email) if no sols send to claimant 1 for your file ................. if they've sent an N181 please advise here. dx      
    • you dont have to await the 50% time to come, she could VT today and you hand the car back and then only have the remaining sum to the 50% mark to pay going fwd. just stopping paying is not really a worthy way forward, as if if if they were to goto court and attain a return of goods order, then she would be liable to hand the car back and have to pay the full sum on the agreement, just like if she were to let them just repo the car now, under Voluntary Termination, both of which you need to avoid...so do a VT ASAP. if she wants to keep the car, then do a time order. as for advice on other sites, which you should not be refering too anyway, use CAG, they always fall toward finance co's getting their maximum buck.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ACS:Law copyright file sharing claims, Gallant Macmillan - and probably some others along the way...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4952 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wally,

 

In my opinion (and it is only my opinion) they make the claim in great detail in the original letter. By denying said claim, stating no knowledge of the claim made, at said address, a willingness to fight the claim and recuperate costs in court, etc, what else needs to be said?

 

Be clearly stating the claim is refuted and no further correspondance will be entered in to, should force ACS to put up or shut up.

 

They then could fish as much as they wanted, but if I was a judge, I'd ask what the feck ACS are up to by continually fishing.

 

By responding to further letters it gives ACS license to continue to fish and adds the possibility of disclosing further information.

 

I guess though I'd be inclined to put

 

"I acknowledge receipt of your letter dated xxxx and note it's contents.

I refer you to my response dated xxxx as my position remains unchanged."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I agree with you Scooby, however I think that it's best that both approaches are put out there as neither is incorrect imo.

 

My personal opinion, is that I think the best way of protecting yourself is to reinforce your innocence. My fear would be that a judge could look the other way and says that you simply compiled a default template letter and fired it off and ducked for cover. I would only feel comfortable with ignoring the claim letters once I had made my position very clear to them and ensured that they have no provided any other "evidence" that could implicate the allegation back to me.

 

If anything, this would then show that they are indeed harassing, as you have made your position clear with a reasonable amount of communication and that you have also given them a fair answer of "adamantly innocent" to their initial claim. Seeing as they haven't provided any evidence other than repeating the sketchy details from the original letter of claim, they would simply have then very little against you should it progress any further.

 

For example, they say "there has been no mistake in our identification of evidence" in their 2nd letter, I strongly believe that it's only in your best interest to reply saying that "I'm innocent as I said before, there has been a mistake".

 

This then forces their hand to the position that they do not want to be in, which would forcing court proceedings which they would lose.

 

Eitherway, you are right...have to be careful not to give anything else away in doing so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Recieved email from Legal complaints service acknowledging my letter and and saying that they will make a file and contact me soon. Still waiting to here from SRA, Watchdog and Deborah Prince at Which.....

Keep complaining, I feel the end is nigh for ACS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allow a month to pass buddy, should get one in back within that month :-|

 

Got mine within days...

 

Leaving it a while to reply now. Full time job and family responsibilities come first. Absolute farce the whole thing. It genuinely sickens me that they are so blatantly getting away with this so far. They are seriously deluded and seem to believe every word they say.

 

The temptation to go down there is so strong. If, and i know it's a huge IF, anyone does get taken to court, they should post it on here. I for one would go down.

 

My only problem would be choosing between cricket bat or golf club...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Did anyone else's letter name a company called NG3 Systems Limited as the provider of the data?

 

This info would help enormously. PM if you need to

 

Cheers

Edited by acshunter
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just recieved me 2nd allegation of copyright infringement from ACS. The first one went to section 36 and that was 6 months ago. The 2nd case is a more recent one, even harder to believe. In the 1st case I ignored the 1st letter and only replied to the 2nd. Is this a better route as they are hardly going to take you to court after the 1st letter, and it buys more time?

 

Have ACS actually taken anyone to court yet, after correct LOD writing?

 

This being the 2nd allegation am I more likely to go to court even with the LOD route. Do ACS cross reference their cases, it's a different client?

 

Advise appreciated?

Link to post
Share on other sites

wakaday,

 

Not sure I'm qualified to advise as I'm new to this myself, someone wih more experience will be along soon...

 

It seems to me they're getting desperate, as though its all gonna end soon. There has been a number of people that have been accused twice - has their source of data dried up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no mention of them winning any court cases or even taking anyone to court, that I am aware of. I am sure that if there had been it would be all over their website.

 

And, search as hard as you like, you won't find one.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

ACS Law are using a company called NG3 Systems Limited as their "IT forensic experts"

NG3 Systems Limited are a Private Limited Company. Company No.06228621

The nature of their business is listed as Hardware consultancy and Software publishing.

Company registered on 26/04/2007

Operates from 31 Albatross Close, London, E6 5NX. - Imagery suggests this is a block of flats. Demographics sites support this "mainly 2 bed flats"

Current Appointments: 1 Director - Iranian, Name: TORABI, ALIREZA.

1 Secretary - Iranian, Name: GHALANSOUI, ANOOSHA.

Supporting Evidence: Various web searches show results of TORABI, ALIREZA involved in IP packet capture discussions.

 

freebsd-questions - week of 17 March 2008

 

http://unix.derkeiler.com/pdf/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/net/2008-03/msg00291.pdf

 

Subject also hosts a website called zangbar.com

 

[...] zangbar.com: "Alireza Torabi" owns about 4 other domains View these domains > is a contact on the whois record of 3 domains

2 registrars have maintained records for this domain since 2006-12-20 with 1 drop. This domain has changed name servers 6 times over 1 year.

Registrant:

Alireza Torabi

Alireza Torabi

London, LONDON W1

GB

Registrar: NAMESDIRECT

Domain Name: ZANGBAR.COM

Created on: 20-OCT-09

Expires on: 20-OCT-11

Last Updated on: 10-JAN-10

Edited by acshunter
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4952 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...